IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i8p1810-d1372947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective Optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for a Hybrid Solar–Waste Energy Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Lina Wang

    (School of Marine Technology and Environment, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China)

  • Jun Yang

    (School of Marine Technology and Environment, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China)

  • Bing Qu

    (School of Marine Technology and Environment, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China)

  • Chang Pang

    (Department of Basic, Dalian Naval Academy, Dalian 116013, China)

Abstract

In pursuit of sustainable development and mitigation of the intermittency challenge associated with solar energy, this study proposes a hybrid solar system integrating waste heat incineration alongside solar power generation and distinct heat provision. Leveraging the superior energy efficiency of the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) in medium- and low-temperature scenarios, a parabolic trough collector (PTC) is selected for its cost-effectiveness and long-term operational reliability. Dowtherm A and toluene are identified as the optimal working fluids for the PTC and ORC, respectively. To optimize this complex system, a combination of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and multi-objective optimization via non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) is employed, streamlining the optimization process. Thermal dynamic simulations are executed using Engineering Equation Solver (EES, V11) to validate the proposed system’s performance. TOPSIS is employed to identify the optimal solution from the Pareto frontier. The results indicate that the hourly cost of the system stands at USD 43.08, with an exergy efficiency of 22.98%. The economic analysis reveals that the solar collector constitutes the most significant portion of the total initial cost, representing 53.2%, followed by the turbine, thermoelectric generator (TEG), and waste heat incineration, in descending order of costliness.

Suggested Citation

  • Lina Wang & Jun Yang & Bing Qu & Chang Pang, 2024. "Multi-Objective Optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for a Hybrid Solar–Waste Energy Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1810-:d:1372947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1810/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1810/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alirahmi, Seyed Mojtaba & Ebrahimi-Moghadam, Amir, 2022. "Comparative study, working fluid selection, and optimal design of three systems for electricity and freshwater based on solid oxide fuel cell mover cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Razmi, Amir Reza & Hanifi, Amir Reza & Shahbakhti, Mahdi, 2023. "Design, thermodynamic, and economic analyses of a green hydrogen storage concept based on solid oxide electrolyzer/fuel cells and heliostat solar field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Ouyang, Tiancheng & Pan, Mingming & Tan, Xianlin & Huang, Youbin & Mo, Chunlan & Wang, Zhiping, 2023. "Advanced power-refrigeration-cycle integrated WHR system for marine natural gas engine base on multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Alirahmi, Seyed Meysam & Raisi, Afrasiab & Ghasemi, Behzad & Nadooshan, Afshin Ahmadi, 2023. "Comprehensive techno-economic assessment and tri-objective optimization of an innovative integration of compressed air energy storage system and solid oxide fuel cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    4. Lina Wang & Chunyu Zhou & Hamid Reza Rahbari, 2023. "Optimizing Solar Energy Harvesting through Integrated Organic Rankine Cycle–Reverse Osmosis Systems: A Techno–Economic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1810-:d:1372947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.