IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i7p1756-d1371066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic Analysis of an Increasing-Pressure Endothermic Power Cycle Integrated with Closed-Loop Geothermal Energy Extraction

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Yu

    (Department of Energy and Power Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Xinli Lu

    (Department of Energy and Power Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Wei Zhang

    (Department of Energy and Power Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Jiali Liu

    (Department of Energy and Power Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

Abstract

The thermodynamic analysis of an increasing-pressure endothermic power cycle (IPEPC) integrated with closed-loop geothermal energy extraction (CLGEE) in a geothermal well at a depth from 2 km to 5 km has been carried out in this study. Using CLGEE can avoid some typical problems associated with traditional EGS technology, such as water contamination and seismic-induced risk. Simultaneous optimization has been conducted for the structural parameters of the downhole heat exchanger (DHE), the CO 2 mixture working fluid type, and the IPEPC operating parameters. The CO 2 -R32 mixture has been selected as the optimal working fluid for the IPEPC based on the highest net power output obtained. It has been found that, when the DHE length is 4 km, the thermosiphon effect is capable of compensating for 53.8% of the pump power consumption. As long as the DHE inlet pressure is higher than the critical pressure, a lower DHE inlet pressure results in more power production. The power generation performance of the IPEPC has been compared with that of the organic Rankine cycle (ORC), trans-critical carbon dioxide cycle (t-CO 2 ), and single-flash (SF) systems. The comparison shows that the IPEPC has more net power output than other systems in the case that the DHE length is less than 3 km, along with a DHE outer diameter of 0.155 m. When the DHE outer diameter is increased to 0.22 m, the IPEPC has the highest net power output for the DHE length ranging from 2 km to 5 km. The application scopes obtained in this study for different power generation systems are of engineering-guiding significance for geothermal industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Yu & Xinli Lu & Wei Zhang & Jiali Liu, 2024. "Thermodynamic Analysis of an Increasing-Pressure Endothermic Power Cycle Integrated with Closed-Loop Geothermal Energy Extraction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1756-:d:1371066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1756/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1756/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yildirim, Nurdan & Parmanto, Slamet & Akkurt, Gulden Gokcen, 2019. "Thermodynamic assessment of downhole heat exchangers for geothermal power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1080-1091.
    2. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & He, Ya-Ling & Xu, Jin-Liang, 2019. "A study of new method and comprehensive evaluation on the improved performance of solar power tower plant with the CO2-based mixture cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Xu, Chaoshui & Dowd, Peter Alan & Tian, Zhao Feng, 2015. "A simplified coupled hydro-thermal model for enhanced geothermal systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 135-145.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heinze, Thomas, 2021. "Constraining the heat transfer coefficient of rock fractures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 433-447.
    2. Shi, Yu & Song, Xianzhi & Wang, Gaosheng & McLennan, John & Forbes, Bryan & Li, Xiaojiang & Li, Jiacheng, 2019. "Study on wellbore fluid flow and heat transfer of a multilateral-well CO2 enhanced geothermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 14-27.
    3. He, Renhui & Rong, Guan & Tan, Jie & Phoon, Kok-Kwang & Quan, Junsong, 2022. "Numerical evaluation of heat extraction performance in enhanced geothermal system considering rough-walled fractures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 524-544.
    4. Zhao, Peng & Liu, Jun & Elsworth, Derek, 2023. "Numerical study on a multifracture enhanced geothermal system considering matrix permeability enhancement induced by thermal unloading," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 33-44.
    5. Cheng, Wen-Long & Liu, Jian & Nian, Yong-Le & Wang, Chang-Long, 2016. "Enhancing geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells with thermal reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 537-545.
    6. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    7. Muhammad Haris & Michael Z. Hou & Wentao Feng & Jiashun Luo & Muhammad Khurram Zahoor & Jianxing Liao, 2020. "Investigative Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Modelling Approach for Geothermal Heat Extraction through Multistage Hydraulic Fracturing from Hot Geothermal Sedimentary Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Chen, Yun & Ma, Guowei & Wang, Huidong & Li, Tuo & Wang, Yang & Sun, Zizheng, 2020. "Optimizing heat mining strategies in a fractured geothermal reservoir considering fracture deformation effects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 326-337.
    9. Pokhrel, Sajjan & Sasmito, Agus P. & Sainoki, Atsushi & Tosha, Toshiyuki & Tanaka, Tatsuya & Nagai, Chiaki & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Field-scale experimental and numerical analysis of a downhole coaxial heat exchanger for geothermal energy production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 521-535.
    10. Kexun Wang & Tishi Huang & Wenke Zhang & Zhiqiang Zhang & Xueqing Ma & Leyao Zhang, 2023. "An Analysis of the Heat Transfer Characteristics of Medium-Shallow Borehole Ground Heat Exchangers with Various Working Fluids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Li, Jiawei & Yuan, Wanju & Zhang, Yin & Cherubini, Claudia & Scheuermann, Alexander & Galindo Torres, Sergio Andres & Li, Ling, 2020. "Numerical investigations of CO2 and N2 miscible flow as the working fluid in enhanced geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    12. Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Liu, Songze & Liu, Zhaoyi & Li, Hao & Shi, Erxiu & Liu, Xuemei & Liu, Hongliang, 2020. "Analysis on the heat extraction performance of multi-well injection enhanced geothermal system based on leaf-like bifurcated fracture networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    13. Xiang Gao & Tailu Li & Yao Zhang & Xiangfei Kong & Nan Meng, 2022. "A Review of Simulation Models of Heat Extraction for a Geothermal Reservoir in an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Wang, Yang & Li, Tuo & Chen, Yun & Ma, Guowei, 2019. "Numerical analysis of heat mining and geological carbon sequestration in supercritical CO2 circulating enhanced geothermal systems inlayed with complex discrete fracture networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 92-108.
    15. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    16. Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Liu, Songze & Liu, Zhaoyi & Li, Hao & Shi, Erxiu, 2020. "Study on the effect of well layout schemes and fracture parameters on the heat extraction performance of enhanced geothermal system in fractured reservoir," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    17. Zhixue Sun & Wentong Song & Hao Zhang & Xueyuan Li & Shuang Xie & Haifeng Nie, 2023. "Heat Extraction Evaluation of CO 2 and Water Flow through Different Fracture Networks for Enhanced Geothermal Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Ding, Junfeng & Wang, Shimin, 2018. "2D modeling of well array operating enhanced geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 918-932.
    19. Feng Xiong & Chu Zhu & Qinghui Jiang, 2021. "A Novel Procedure for Coupled Simulation of Thermal and Fluid Flow Models for Rough-Walled Rock Fractures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Yu, Likui & Wu, Xiaotian & Wang, Yadan & Ma, Weiwu & Liu, Gang, 2020. "Stratified rock hydraulic fracturing for enhanced geothermal system and fracture geometry evaluation via effective length," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 713-723.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1756-:d:1371066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.