IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i6p1282-d1353104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Methods for Calculating Shading and Blocking Efficiency in Central Receiver Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Guillermo Ortega

    (E.T.S. Ingeniería, Universidad de Huelva (UHU), Campus El Carmen, Avd. Tres de Marzo, s/n, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

  • Rubén Barbero

    (E.T.S. Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), C/Juan del Rosal, 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Antonio Rovira

    (E.T.S. Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), C/Juan del Rosal, 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This paper presents three new methods for calculating the shading and blocking efficiency in Central Receiver Systems (CRSs). All of them are characterized by the calculation of multiple useful and total reflecting areas without the need to resort to parallel calculation in the CPU or GPU, and by low computation times and minimum errors. They are being specially designed for implementation in codes focused on heliostat field design and optimization in CRSs. The proposed methods have been compared against two outstanding “individual” methods ( homology and Boolean operations ), in addition to a reference case based on the Monte Carlo ray-tracing (MCRT) technique. The results indicate that one of the proposed methods presents reduced error values and high computational speed, even relaxing the restrictions on candidate filtering. At the same error level, the global method is up to 7.80 times faster than the fastest individual method ( homology ) and up to 194 times faster than the method based on the MCRT technique. The causes of the main errors of each method are also analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillermo Ortega & Rubén Barbero & Antonio Rovira, 2024. "Global Methods for Calculating Shading and Blocking Efficiency in Central Receiver Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1282-:d:1353104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ortega, Guillermo & Rovira, Antonio, 2020. "A fast and accurate methodology for the calculation of the shading and blocking efficiency in central receiver systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 58-70.
    2. Besarati, Saeb M. & Yogi Goswami, D., 2014. "A computationally efficient method for the design of the heliostat field for solar power tower plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 226-232.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Collado, Francisco J. & Guallar, Jesus, 2019. "Quick design of regular heliostat fields for commercial solar tower power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 115-125.
    2. Ortega, Guillermo & Rovira, Antonio, 2020. "A new method for the selection of candidates for shading and blocking in central receiver systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 961-973.
    3. Rizvi, Arslan A. & Yang, Dong, 2022. "A detailed account of calculation of shading and blocking factor of a heliostat field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 292-303.
    4. Amani, Madjid & Ghenaiet, Adel, 2020. "Novel hybridization of solar central receiver system with combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    5. Xie, Qiyue & Guo, Ziqi & Liu, Daifei & Chen, Zhisheng & Shen, Zhongli & Wang, Xiaoli, 2021. "Optimization of heliostat field distribution based on improved Gray Wolf optimization algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 447-458.
    6. Wang, Jianxing & Duan, Liqiang & Yang, Yongping, 2018. "An improvement crossover operation method in genetic algorithm and spatial optimization of heliostat field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 15-28.
    7. Saghafifar, Mohammad & Gadalla, Mohamed, 2016. "Thermo-economic analysis of air bottoming cycle hybridization using heliostat field collector: A comparative analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 698-714.
    8. Chao Li & Rongrong Zhai & Yongping Yang, 2017. "Optimization of a Heliostat Field Layout on Annual Basis Using a Hybrid Algorithm Combining Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Genetic Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    9. García, Jesús & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Beath, Andrew & Kim, Jin-Soo & Sanjuan, Marco E., 2018. "Dynamic performance of an aiming control methodology for solar central receivers due to cloud disturbances," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 355-367.
    10. Wang, Chen & Guo, Su & Pei, Huanjin & He, Yi & Liu, Deyou & Li, Mengying, 2023. "Rolling optimization based on holism for the operation strategy of solar tower power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    11. Nicolás C. Cruz & José D. Álvarez & Juana L. Redondo & Jesús Fernández-Reche & Manuel Berenguel & Rafael Monterreal & Pilar M. Ortigosa, 2017. "A New Methodology for Building-Up a Robust Model for Heliostat Field Flux Characterization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Saghafifar, Mohammad & Gadalla, Mohamed, 2017. "Thermo-economic optimization of hybrid solar Maisotsenko bottoming cycles using heliostat field collector: Comparative analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 686-702.
    13. Chen, Jinli & Xiao, Gang & Xu, Haoran & Zhou, Xin & Yang, Jiamin & Ni, Mingjiang & Cen, Kefa, 2022. "Experiment and dynamic simulation of a solar tower collector system for power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 946-958.
    14. Cruz, N.C. & Redondo, J.L. & Berenguel, M. & Álvarez, J.D. & Ortigosa, P.M., 2017. "Review of software for optical analyzing and optimizing heliostat fields," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1001-1018.
    15. Saghafifar, Mohammad & Gadalla, Mohamed, 2017. "Thermo-economic evaluation of water-injected air bottoming cycles hybridization using heliostat field collector: Comparative analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1230-1246.
    16. Ashley, Thomas & Carrizosa, Emilio & Fernández-Cara, Enrique, 2017. "Optimisation of aiming strategies in Solar Power Tower plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 285-291.
    17. Cruz, N.C. & Salhi, S. & Redondo, J.L. & Álvarez, J.D. & Berenguel, M. & Ortigosa, P.M., 2018. "Hector, a new methodology for continuous and pattern-free heliostat field optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1123-1131.
    18. Sánchez-González, Alberto & Santana, Domingo, 2015. "Solar flux distribution on central receivers: A projection method from analytic function," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 576-587.
    19. Piroozmand, Pasha & Boroushaki, Mehrdad, 2016. "A computational method for optimal design of the multi-tower heliostat field considering heliostats interactions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 240-252.
    20. Atif, Maimoon. & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A., 2017. "Energy and exergy analyses of solar tower power plant driven supercritical carbon dioxide recompression cycles for six different locations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 153-167.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1282-:d:1353104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.