IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i23p5933-d1529974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost–Benefit Analysis of the China’s Household Coal-to-Electricity Transition: A Case Study on the Beijing Mentougou Area

Author

Listed:
  • Yanran Pan

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Lei Jiang

    (Ecology and Environment Bureau of Mentougou District of Beijing Municipality, Beijing 100041, China)

  • Hui Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Since 2013, China has implemented clean heating projects such as the coal-to-electricity project to reduce emissions and improve air quality in northern China, but it still requires significant investment from governments, businesses, and households. However, the benefits of coal-to-electricity to improve the rural family environment have received less attention. In this study, we conducted a cost–benefit analysis of the coal-to-electricity transition in Beijing’s Mentougou District from 2013 to 2017, distinguishing private costs and benefits, government costs and public benefits, and social costs and benefits. The results show that for all coal-to-electricity households, the private benefits far outweigh the private costs, with a benefit–cost ratio of 15.9. The government costs outweigh the benefit of air pollutants and carbon dioxide emission reduction, with a benefit–cost ratio of 0.4. Overall, the social benefits outweigh the social costs: the benefit–cost ratio for society was 2.2. The environmental benefits of the coal-to-electricity policies did not offset the large amount of investment of the government, but society received a positive net benefit owing to the large benefits gained by rural households. This also proves that the investment by the government is efficient and verifies the government’s next step to continue to promote the coal-to-electricity transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanran Pan & Lei Jiang & Hui Wang, 2024. "Cost–Benefit Analysis of the China’s Household Coal-to-Electricity Transition: A Case Study on the Beijing Mentougou Area," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:5933-:d:1529974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/5933/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/5933/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ekin Birol & Phoebe Koundouri, 2008. "Choice Experiments Informing Environmental Policy:A European Perspective," DEOS Working Papers 0801, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    2. Zhang, Xiang & Jin, Yana & Dai, Hancheng & Xie, Yang & Zhang, Shiqiu, 2019. "Health and economic benefits of cleaner residential heating in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 165-178.
    3. Ekin Birol & Phoebe Koundouri, 2008. "Choice Experiments Informing Environmental Policy: A European Perspective. Concluding remarks and future directions," DEOS Working Papers 0810, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiziano Tempesta & Daniel Vecchiato, 2018. "The Value of a Properly Maintained Hiking Trail Network and a Traditional Landscape for Mountain Recreation in the Dolomites," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre & Andersson, Henrik & Beaumais, Olivier & Crastes dit Sourd, Romain & Hess, François-Charles & Wolff, François-Charles, 2017. "Stated preferences: a unique database composed of 1657 recent published articles in journals related to agriculture, environment, or health," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 98(3), November.
    3. Roy Brouwer & Fumbi Job & Bianca Kroon & Richard Johnston, 2015. "Comparing Willingness to Pay for Improved Drinking-Water Quality Using Stated Preference Methods in Rural and Urban Kenya," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 81-94, February.
    4. Aditya, K.S. & Kishore, Avinash & Khan, Tajuddin, 2020. "Exploring farmers’ willingness to pay for crop insurance products: A case of weather-based crop insurance in Punjab India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 33(2), December.
    5. Koundouri, Phoebe & Chatzistamoulou, Nikos & Dávila, Osiel González & Giannouli, Amerissa & Kourogenis, Nikolaos & Xepapadeas, Anastasios & Xepapadeas, Petros, 2021. "Open Access in Scientific Information: Sustainability Model and Business Plan for the Infrastructure and Organization of OpenAIRE," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 170-198, March.
    6. Alejandra R. Enríquez & Angel Bujosa Bestard, 2020. "Measuring the economic impact of climate-induced environmental changes on sun-and-beach tourism," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 203-217, May.
    7. Liu, Hongxun & Mauzerall, Denise L., 2020. "Costs of clean heating in China: Evidence from rural households in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Li, Hui & Zhang, Ruining & Ai, Xianneng, 2022. "Cost estimation of “coal-to-gas” project: Government and residents’ perspectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Yang, Xi & Pang, Jun & Teng, Fei & Gong, Ruixin & Springer, Cecilia, 2021. "The environmental co-benefit and economic impact of China's low-carbon pathways: Evidence from linking bottom-up and top-down models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Lienhoop, Nele & Schröter-Schlaack, Christoph, 2018. "Involving multiple actors in ecosystem service governance: Exploring the role of stated preference valuation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PB), pages 181-188.
    11. Xie, Lunyu & Wei, Chu & Zheng, Xinye & Liu, Yang & Wu, Wanyi & Feng, Ziru, 2023. "Who benefits from household energy transition? A cost-benefit analysis based on household survey data in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    12. Vlaeminck, Pieter & Jiang, Ting & Vranken, Liesbet, 2014. "Labelling and consumer behaviour: experimental evidence from a Belgian supermarket," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182742, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Xiao, Bowen & Fan, Ying & Guo, Xiaodan & Xiang, Lin, 2022. "Re-evaluating environmental tax: An intergenerational perspective on health, education and retirement," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    14. Chen, Si-Yuan & Xue, Meng-Tian & Wang, Zhao-Hua & Tian, Xin & Zhang, Bin, 2022. "Exploring pathways of phasing out clean heating subsidies for rural residential buildings in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    15. Zhang, Xiao-Bing & Xie, Lunyu & Zhang, Xinyi & Hu, Xian, 2020. "Energy Poverty and Household Energy Transition in Rural China," EfD Discussion Paper 20-15, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    16. Pan Lingying, & Kui, Zhou & Weiqi, Li & Fuyuan, Yang & Zheng, Li, 2019. "Subsidy policy discussion on the hydroelectric power substitution for scattered coal consumption: A case study of Sichuan Province," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 539-549.
    17. Roy Brouwer & Marije Schaafsma, 2013. "Modelling risk adaptation and mitigation behaviour under different climate change scenarios," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 11-29, March.
    18. Biancamaria Torquati & Tiziano Tempesta & Daniel Vecchiato & Sonia Venanzi, 2018. "Tasty or Sustainable? The Effect of Product Sensory Experience on a Sustainable New Food Product: An Application of Discrete Choice Experiments on Chianina Tinned Beef," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    19. Jeanne Dachary-Bernard & Marie Lemariè, 2011. "People preferences for spatial land use attributes: how it can support land management decisions?," ERSA conference papers ersa10p674, European Regional Science Association.
    20. Rocamora, Beatriz & Colombo, Sergio & Glenk, Klaus, 2014. "El impacto de las respuestas inconsistentes en las medidas de bienestar estimadas con el método del experimento de elección," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 14(02), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:5933-:d:1529974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.