IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i19p4882-d1488372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Efficiency and Sustainability in Food Retail Buildings: Introducing a Novel Assessment Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Forastiere

    (Department of Architecture (DIDA), University of Florence, Via della Mattonaia 8, 50121 Florence, Italy)

  • Cristina Piselli

    (Department of Architecture (DIDA), University of Florence, Via della Mattonaia 8, 50121 Florence, Italy)

  • Andrea Silei

    (Department of Architecture (DIDA), University of Florence, Via della Mattonaia 8, 50121 Florence, Italy)

  • Fabio Sciurpi

    (Department of Architecture (DIDA), University of Florence, Via della Mattonaia 8, 50121 Florence, Italy)

  • Anna Laura Pisello

    (Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 93, 06125 Perugia, Italy
    EAPLAB at CIRIAF—Interuniversity Research Center, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 67, 06125 Perugia, Italy)

  • Franco Cotana

    (Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 93, 06125 Perugia, Italy
    Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico, RSE S.p.a., Via R. Rubattino 54, 20134 Milano, Italy)

  • Carla Balocco

    (Department of Architecture (DIDA), University of Florence, Via della Mattonaia 8, 50121 Florence, Italy)

Abstract

One of the primary global objectives is to decrease building energy consumption to promote energy efficiency and environmental sustainability. The large-scale food retail trade sector accounts for over 15% of total primary energy consumption in Europe, posing a significant challenge to the transition towards green energy. This study proposes a simple method for energy efficiency, environmental sustainability, and cost-saving assessment and improvement in large-scale food retail trade buildings. It aims to analyze the energy and environmental performance of building–plant systems, establishing an interactive network to assess intervention potential for the energy transition. The investigation focuses on the proper selection and analysis of the benefits of retrofit solution implementation, emphasizing potential energy savings in current and future climate change scenarios. Dynamic simulation with the Building Energy Model (BEM) was used to evaluate the impacts of building–plant system retrofit solutions, such as high thermal insulation, photovoltaic (PV) panels, Light Emitting Diode (LED) installation, waste heat recovery, and improvement in refrigeration units. The results show a reduction in annual energy consumption for the PV panel installation by up to 29% and lighting systems with high-quality LED to 60%. Additionally, CO 2 emissions can be decreased by up to 41% by combining these two strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Forastiere & Cristina Piselli & Andrea Silei & Fabio Sciurpi & Anna Laura Pisello & Franco Cotana & Carla Balocco, 2024. "Energy Efficiency and Sustainability in Food Retail Buildings: Introducing a Novel Assessment Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:19:p:4882-:d:1488372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/19/4882/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/19/4882/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abu Bakar, Nur Najihah & Hassan, Mohammad Yusri & Abdullah, Hayati & Rahman, Hasimah Abdul & Abdullah, Md Pauzi & Hussin, Faridah & Bandi, Masilah, 2015. "Energy efficiency index as an indicator for measuring building energy performance: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-11.
    2. Székely, Francisco & Knirsch, Marianna, 2005. "Responsible Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility:: Metrics for Sustainable Performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 628-647, December.
    3. Moudgil, Vipul & Hewage, Kasun & Hussain, Syed Asad & Sadiq, Rehan, 2023. "Integration of IoT in building energy infrastructure: A critical review on challenges and solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vaclovas Miskinis & Arvydas Galinis & Inga Konstantinaviciute & Viktorija Bobinaite & Jarek Niewierowicz & Eimantas Neniskis & Egidijus Norvaisa & Dalius Tarvydas, 2025. "Key Determinants of Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emission Savings in Commercial and Public Services in the Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-26, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mustaffa, Nur Kamaliah & Kudus, Sakhiah Abdul, 2022. "Challenges and way forward towards best practices of energy efficient building in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    3. Muhammad Zahid & Haseeb Ur Rahman & Musa Khan & Wajahat Ali & Fazaila Shad, 2020. "Addressing endogeneity by proposing novel instrumental variables in the nexus of sustainability reporting and firm financial performance: A step‐by‐step procedure for non‐experts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3086-3103, December.
    4. Hazal Koray Alay & Abdulkadir Keskin & Meri Taksi Deveciyan & Gülaçtı Şen & Didem Kayalıdereden & Şayan Berber, 2024. "The Impact of Green Business Ethics and Green Financing on Sustainable Business Performance of Industries in Türkiye: The Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Angel Sevil & Alfonso Cruz & Tomas Reyes & Roberto Vassolo, 2022. "When Being Large Is Not an Advantage: How Innovation Impacts the Sustainability of Firm Performance in Natural Resource Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Tze San Ong & Boon Heng Teh & Ah Suat Lee, 2019. "Contingent Factors and Sustainable Performance Measurement (SPM) Practices of Malaysian Electronics and Electrical Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-33, February.
    7. Wang, Yang & Kuckelkorn, Jens & Li, Daoliang & Du, Jiangtao, 2018. "Evaluation on distributed renewable energy system integrated with a Passive House building using a new energy performance index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 81-89.
    8. Tullio de Rubeis & Annamaria Ciccozzi & Letizia Giusti & Dario Ambrosini, 2022. "The 3D Printing Potential for Heat Flow Optimization: Influence of Block Geometries on Heat Transfer Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Camélia Radu & Nadia Smaili, 2021. "Corporate performance patterns of Canadian listed firms: Balancing financial and corporate social responsibility outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3344-3359, November.
    10. Ming‐Lang Tseng & Ming K. Lim & Kuo‐Jui Wu, 2018. "Corporate sustainability performance improvement using an interrelationship hierarchical model approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1334-1346, December.
    11. Mert Bilgin, 2009. "The PEARL Model: Gaining Competitive Advantage Through Sustainable Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 545-554, April.
    12. Rosaura Castrillón Mendoza & Javier M. Rey Hernández & Eloy Velasco Gómez & Julio F. San José Alonso & Francisco J. Rey Martínez, 2018. "Analysis of the Methodology to Obtain Several Key Indicators Performance (KIP), by Energy Retrofitting of the Actual Building to the District Heating Fuelled by Biomass, Focusing on nZEB Goal: Case of," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Dorel Mihai Paraschiv & Estera Laura Nemoianu & Claudia Adriana Langă & Tünde Szabó, 2012. "Eco-innovation, Responsible Leadership and Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(32), pages 404-419, June.
    14. Ekaterina Blinova & Tatyana Ponomarenko & Valentin Knysh, 2022. "Analyzing the Concept of Corporate Sustainability in the Context of Sustainable Business Development in the Mining Sector with Elements of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, July.
    15. Schöll, Michaela, 2017. "Three Essays on Sustainable Supply Chain Management – Towards Sustainable Supplier Selection and Sustainable Sourcing," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 172463, March.
    16. Zhao, Lu-Tao & Liu, Zhao-Ting & Cheng, Lei, 2021. "How will China's coal industry develop in the future? A quantitative analysis with policy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    17. Kai Hockerts, 2015. "A Cognitive Perspective on the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 102-122, February.
    18. Olivier Boiral & David Talbot & Pascal Paillé, 2015. "Leading by Example: A Model of Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 532-550, September.
    19. Abdul Mujeebu, Muhammad & Alshamrani, Othman Subhi, 2016. "Prospects of energy conservation and management in buildings – The Saudi Arabian scenario versus global trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1647-1663.
    20. Wang, Xia & Ding, Chao & Zhou, Mao & Cai, Weiguang & Ma, Xianrui & Yuan, Jiachen, 2023. "Assessment of space heating consumption efficiency based on a household survey in the hot summer and cold winter climate zone in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:19:p:4882-:d:1488372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.