IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i17p4325-d1466824.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Public Relations Policy for Accelerating Hydrogen Acceptance: Insights from an Expert Survey in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Minhyuk Cho

    (Regulatory Policy Research Center, CG Inside Co., Ltd., 122 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04213, Republic of Korea)

  • Youhyun Lee

    (Department of Public Administration, Ajou University, 206 Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea)

  • Youngjin Kim

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hannam University, 70 Hannam-ro, Daedeok-gu, Daejeon 34430, Republic of Korea)

  • Min Chul Lee

    (Department of Safety Engineering, Fire Disaster Prevention Research Center, Incheon National University, 119 Academy-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Hydrogen has great growth potential due to its green, carbon-neutral nature, but public acceptance is low due to negative perceptions of the dangers associated with hydrogen energy. Safety concerns, particularly related to its flammability and explosiveness, are an obstacle to hydrogen energy policy. In South Korea, recent hydrogen-related explosions have exacerbated these concerns, undermining public confidence. This study developed public relations (PR) strategies to manage risk perception and promote hydrogen energy acceptance by analyzing the opinions of government officials and experts using SWOT factors, the TOWS matrix, and the analytic hierarchy process. The findings highlight the importance of addressing weaknesses and threats in PR efforts. Key weaknesses include Korea’s technological lag and the low localization of core hydrogen technologies, both of which hinder competitiveness and negatively impact public perception of hydrogen energy. Notable threats include deteriorating energy dependency and expanding global carbon regulations. This information can be used to influence attitudes and foster public acceptance of hydrogen energy policies. Emphasizing weaknesses and threats may result in more effective PR strategies, even if they do not directly address the primary concerns of scientific experts. The persuasive insights identified in this study can support future policy communication and PR strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Minhyuk Cho & Youhyun Lee & Youngjin Kim & Min Chul Lee, 2024. "Strategic Public Relations Policy for Accelerating Hydrogen Acceptance: Insights from an Expert Survey in South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4325-:d:1466824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4325/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4325/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ida-Elisabeth Andersen & Birgit Jæger, 1999. "Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: Towards more democratic decision-making," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 26(5), pages 331-340, October.
    2. Michael Siegrist, 2021. "Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 480-490, March.
    3. Savage, Ian, 2013. "Comparing the fatality risks in United States transportation across modes and over time," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 9-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vizinho, André & Avelar, David & Fonseca, Ana Lúcia & Carvalho, Silvia & Sucena-Paiva, Leonor & Pinho, Pedro & Nunes, Alice & Branquinho, Cristina & Vasconcelos, Ana Cátia & Santos, Filipe Duarte & Ro, 2021. "Framing the application of Adaptation Pathways for agroforestry in Mediterranean drylands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Angela Bearth & Gulbanu Kaptan & Sabrina Heike Kessler, 2022. "Genome-edited versus genetically-modified tomatoes: an experiment on people’s perceptions and acceptance of food biotechnology in the UK and Switzerland," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 1117-1131, September.
    3. Gazmararian, Alexander F., 2024. "Valuing the Future: Changing Time Horizons and Policy Preferences," OSF Preprints 2m9fy_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. Lorenzo Di Lucia & Barbara Ribeiro, 2018. "Enacting Responsibilities in Landscape Design: The Case of Advanced Biofuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Walter Locatelli & Angela Testi & Filippo Ansaldi & Marta Giachello & Cinzia Panero & Valentino Tisa & Cecilia Trucchi, 2019. "Governance delle reti sanitarie: i Dipartimenti Inter-Aziendali Regionali (DIAR) nel nuovo sistema sanitario ligure," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(109), pages 57-81.
    6. Casey B. Mulligan, 2021. "The Incidence and Magnitude of the Health Costs of In-person Schooling during the COVID-19 Pandemic," NBER Working Papers 28619, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Rhydian Fôn James & Peter Midmore & Dennis Thomas, 2013. "‘Ground truths’ and scenarios: Examining and testing regional policy in North West Wales," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(6), pages 643-662, September.
    8. Xuemei Fang & Liang Cao & Luyi Zhang & Binbin Peng, 2023. "Risk perception and resistance behavior intention of residents living near chemical industry parks: an empirical analysis in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1655-1675, January.
    9. Sajad Karimi & Zaniar Ardalan & Omid Poursabzi & B. Naderi, 2023. "Toward a safe supply chain: Incorporating accident, physical, psychosocial and mental overload risks into supply chain network," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5579-5595, June.
    10. Bernd Carsten Stahl & Job Timmermans & Catherine Flick, 2017. "Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 369-381.
    11. Clifford Winston, 2013. "On the Performance of the U.S. Transportation System: Caution Ahead," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 773-824, September.
    12. Svein Bråthen & Karoline L. Hoff, 2020. "Economic Impact Assessment of Regulatory Changes: A Case Study of a Proposed New ICAO Standard for Contaminated Runways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, July.
    13. Otieno, James Origa, 2019. "The Public Policy process: A conceptual framework for understanding policy processes and opportunities for influencing policy outcomes," EconStor Preprints 191527, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. Jianchao Hou & Han Wang, 2025. "Analysis of Corporate Acceptance of Hydrogen Energy Technology Based on the Extended Technology Acceptance Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Müller, Berndt & Nuppenau, Ernst-August, 2020. "Aufbau und Bewertung des Agrarumwelt- und Biodiversitätskonzeptes (AUBI) im Maßnahmenraum Südhessen," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305585, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    16. Rubinia Celeste Bonfanti & Benedetta Oberti & Elisa Ravazzoli & Anna Rinaldi & Stefano Ruggieri & Adriano Schimmenti, 2023. "The Role of Trust in Disaster Risk Reduction: A Critical Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Ghimire, Ramesh & Lancelin, Colby, 2019. "The relationship between financial incentives provided by employers and commuters' decision to use transit: Results from the Atlanta Regional Household Travel Survey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 103-113.
    18. Federica Cornali, 2017. "Talking with the Scientists: Promoting Scientific Citizenship at School through Participatory and Deliberative Approach," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 132-144, December.
    19. Kallis, Giorgos & Hatzilacou, Dionyssia & Mexa, Alexandra & Coccossis, Harry & Svoronou, Eleni, 2009. "Beyond the manual: Practicing deliberative visioning in a Greek island," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 979-989, February.
    20. Finn Arler & Karl Sperling & Kristian Borch, 2023. "Landscape Democracy and the Implementation of Renewable Energy Facilities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-27, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4325-:d:1466824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.