IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i17p4264-d1464465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and Environmental Analyses of an Integrated Power and Hydrogen Production Systems Based on Solar Thermal Energy

Author

Listed:
  • Zarif Aminov

    (Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima 739-8529, Japan
    Scientific Technical Center, Academy of Sciences, 32 Durmon Yoli, Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent 100125, Uzbekistan
    JSC “Thermal Power Plants”, Ministry of Energy, 23, Bunyodkor Avenue, Tashkent 100097, Uzbekistan)

  • Khusniddin Alikulov

    (JSC “Thermal Power Plants”, Ministry of Energy, 23, Bunyodkor Avenue, Tashkent 100097, Uzbekistan)

  • Tran-Dang Xuan

    (Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima 739-8529, Japan
    Center for the Planetary Health and Innovation Science (PHIS), The IDEC Institute, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima 739-8529, Japan)

Abstract

This study introduces a novel hybrid solar–biomass cogeneration power plant that efficiently produces heat, electricity, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen using concentrated solar power and syngas from cotton stalk biomass. Detailed exergy-based thermodynamic, economic, and environmental analyses demonstrate that the optimized system achieves an exergy efficiency of 48.67% and an exergoeconomic factor of 80.65% and produces 51.5 MW of electricity, 23.3 MW of heat, and 8334.4 kg/h of hydrogen from 87,156.4 kg/h of biomass. The study explores four scenarios for green hydrogen production pathways, including chemical looping reforming and supercritical water gasification, highlighting significant improvements in levelized costs and the environmental impact compared with other solar-based hybrid systems. Systems 2 and 3 exhibit superior performance, with levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) of 49.2 USD/MWh and 55.4 USD/MWh and levelized costs of hydrogen (LCOH) of between 10.7 and 19.5 USD/MWh. The exergoenvironmental impact factor ranges from 66.2% to 73.9%, with an environmental impact rate of 5.4–7.1 Pts/MWh. Despite high irreversibility challenges, the integration of solar energy significantly enhances the system’s exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental performance, making it a promising alternative as fossil fuel reserves decline. To improve competitiveness, addressing process efficiency and cost reduction in solar concentrators and receivers is crucial.

Suggested Citation

  • Zarif Aminov & Khusniddin Alikulov & Tran-Dang Xuan, 2024. "Economic and Environmental Analyses of an Integrated Power and Hydrogen Production Systems Based on Solar Thermal Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-43, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4264-:d:1464465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4264/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4264/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moosazadeh, Mohammad & Tariq, Shahzeb & Safder, Usman & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2023. "Techno-economic feasibility and environmental impact evaluation of a hybrid solar thermal membrane-based power desalination system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    2. AlNouss, Ahmed & McKay, Gordon & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2020. "Enhancing waste to hydrogen production through biomass feedstock blending: A techno-economic-environmental evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Rahbari, Alireza & Shirazi, Alec & Venkataraman, Mahesh B. & Pye, John, 2021. "Solar fuels from supercritical water gasification of algae: Impacts of low-cost hydrogen on reformer configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    4. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic optimization of biomass-to-methanol with solid-oxide electrolyzer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Lamnatou, Chr. & Chemisana, D., 2017. "Concentrating solar systems: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and environmental issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 916-932.
    6. Kang, Jia-Ning & Wei, Yi-Ming & Liu, Lan-Cui & Han, Rong & Yu, Bi-Ying & Wang, Jin-Wei, 2020. "Energy systems for climate change mitigation: A systematic review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    7. Mohan, Gowtham & Venkataraman, Mahesh B. & Coventry, Joe, 2019. "Sensible energy storage options for concentrating solar power plants operating above 600 °C," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 319-337.
    8. Liu, Xiangyu & Hong, Hui & Zhang, Hao & Cao, Yali & Qu, Wanjun & Jin, Hongguang, 2020. "Solar methanol by hybridizing natural gas chemical looping reforming with solar heat," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    9. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2023. "Green hydrogen production from decarbonized biomass gasification: An integrated techno-economic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Zhicong & Zhang, Ziyue & Xu, Gang & Ge, Shiyu & Xue, Xiaojun & Chen, Heng, 2024. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a new methanol synthesis system coupled with a biomass integrated gasification combined cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    2. Safder, Usman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2024. "Techno-economic assessment of a novel integrated multigeneration system to synthesize e-methanol and green hydrogen in a carbon-neutral context," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Ortiz, C. & Valverde, J.M. & Chacartegui, R. & Perez-Maqueda, L.A. & Giménez, P., 2019. "The Calcium-Looping (CaCO3/CaO) process for thermochemical energy storage in Concentrating Solar Power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Steven Jackson & Eivind Brodal, 2021. "Optimization of a Mixed Refrigerant Based H 2 Liquefaction Pre-Cooling Process and Estimate of Liquefaction Performance with Varying Ambient Temperature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Hu, Xueyue & Wang, Chunying & Elshkaki, Ayman, 2024. "Material-energy Nexus: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Tomasz Jałowiec & Henryk Wojtaszek, 2021. "Analysis of the RES Potential in Accordance with the Energy Policy of the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-33, September.
    7. Bailera, Manuel & Pascual, Sara & Lisbona, Pilar & Romeo, Luis M., 2021. "Modelling calcium looping at industrial scale for energy storage in concentrating solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    8. Lu, J.F. & Dong, Y.X. & Wang, Y.R. & Wang, W.L. & Ding, J., 2022. "High efficient thermochemical energy storage of methane reforming with carbon dioxide in cavity reactor with novel catalyst bed under concentrated sun simulator," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 361-371.
    9. Bravo, Ruben & Ortiz, Carlos & Chacartegui, Ricardo & Friedrich, Daniel, 2021. "Multi-objective optimisation and guidelines for the design of dispatchable hybrid solar power plants with thermochemical energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    10. Wang, Jia & Wen, Mengyuan & Ren, Jurong & La, Xinru & Meng, Xianzhi & Yuan, Xiangzhou & Ragauskas, Arthur J. & Jiang, Jianchun, 2024. "Tailoring microwave frequencies for high-efficiency hydrogen production from biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    11. Nannan Meng & Jiang Shao & Hongjiao Li & Yuting Wang & Xiaoli Fu & Cuibo Liu & Yifu Yu & Bin Zhang, 2022. "Electrosynthesis of formamide from methanol and ammonia under ambient conditions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    12. Komerath, Narayanan M. & Deepak, Ravi, 2023. "A reversible mid-stratospheric architecture to reduce insolation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    13. Zhu, Xianqing & Xu, Mian & Hu, Shiyang & Xia, Ao & Huang, Yun & Luo, Zhang & Xue, Xiao & Zhou, Yao & Zhu, Xun & Liao, Qiang, 2024. "A novel spent LiNixCoyMn1−x−yO2 battery-modified mesoporous Al2O3 catalyst for H2-rich syngas production from catalytic steam co-gasification of pinewood sawdust and polyethylene," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    14. Chen, Xiangxiang & Sun, Zhuang & Kuo, Po-Chih & Aziz, Muhammad, 2024. "Carbon-negative olefins production from biomass and solar energy via direct chemical looping," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    15. Adrián Caraballo & Santos Galán-Casado & Ángel Caballero & Sara Serena, 2021. "Molten Salts for Sensible Thermal Energy Storage: A Review and an Energy Performance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Zhang, Peiye & Liu, Ming & Mu, Ruiqi & Yan, Junjie, 2024. "Exergy-based control strategy design and dynamic performance enhancement for parabolic trough solar receiver-reactor of methanol decomposition reaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    17. Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Boreum & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Projected cost analysis of hybrid methanol production from tri-reforming of methane integrated with various water electrolysis systems: Technical and economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    18. Zhou, Huairong & Cao, Abo & Meng, Wenliang & Wang, Dongliang & Li, Guixian & Yang, Siyu, 2024. "Process integration and analysis of coupling solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) and CO2 to methanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    19. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic evaluation of biomass-to-fuels with solid-oxide electrolyzer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    20. Fiammetta Rita Bianchi & Arianna Baldinelli & Linda Barelli & Giovanni Cinti & Emilio Audasso & Barbara Bosio, 2020. "Multiscale Modeling for Reversible Solid Oxide Cell Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4264-:d:1464465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.