IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i16p4074-d1457664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heat Transfer Estimation in Flow Boiling of R134a within Microfin Tubes: Development of Explainable Machine Learning-Based Pipelines

Author

Listed:
  • Shayan Milani

    (Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Keivan Ardam

    (Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Farzad Dadras Javan

    (Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Behzad Najafi

    (Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Andrea Lucchini

    (Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Igor Matteo Carraretto

    (Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Luigi Pietro Maria Colombo

    (Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

The present study is focused on identifying the most suitable sequence of machine learning-based models and the most promising set of input variables aiming at the estimation of heat transfer in evaporating R134a flows in microfin tubes. Utilizing the available experimental data, dimensionless features representing the evaporation phenomena are first generated and are provided to a machine learning-based model. Feature selection and algorithm optimization procedures are then performed. It is shown that the implemented feature selection method determines only six dimensionless parameters ( S u l : liquid Suratman number, B o : boiling number, F r g : gas Froude number, R e l : liquid Reynolds number, B d : Bond number, and e / D : fin height to tube’s inner diameter ratio) as the most effective input features, which reduces the model’s complexity and facilitates the interpretation of governing physical phenomena. Furthermore, the proposed optimized sequence of machine learning algorithms (providing a mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of 8.84% on the test set) outperforms the most accurate available empirical model (with an MARD of 19.7% on the test set) by a large margin, demonstrating the efficacy of the proposed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Shayan Milani & Keivan Ardam & Farzad Dadras Javan & Behzad Najafi & Andrea Lucchini & Igor Matteo Carraretto & Luigi Pietro Maria Colombo, 2024. "Heat Transfer Estimation in Flow Boiling of R134a within Microfin Tubes: Development of Explainable Machine Learning-Based Pipelines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:16:p:4074-:d:1457664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/16/4074/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/16/4074/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    2. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    2. Oxana Babecka Kucharcukova & Jan Bruha, 2016. "Nowcasting the Czech Trade Balance," Working Papers 2016/11, Czech National Bank.
    3. Carstensen, Kai & Heinrich, Markus & Reif, Magnus & Wolters, Maik H., 2020. "Predicting ordinary and severe recessions with a three-state Markov-switching dynamic factor model," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 829-850.
    4. Hou-Tai Chang & Ping-Huai Wang & Wei-Fang Chen & Chen-Ju Lin, 2022. "Risk Assessment of Early Lung Cancer with LDCT and Health Examinations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Margherita Giuzio, 2017. "Genetic algorithm versus classical methods in sparse index tracking," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 243-256, November.
    6. Nicolaj N. Mühlbach, 2020. "Tree-based Synthetic Control Methods: Consequences of moving the US Embassy," CREATES Research Papers 2020-04, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    7. Wang, Qiao & Zhou, Wei & Cheng, Yonggang & Ma, Gang & Chang, Xiaolin & Miao, Yu & Chen, E, 2018. "Regularized moving least-square method and regularized improved interpolating moving least-square method with nonsingular moment matrices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 325(C), pages 120-145.
    8. Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy & Adrian S. Lewis, 2018. "Error Bounds, Quadratic Growth, and Linear Convergence of Proximal Methods," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 919-948, August.
    9. Mkhadri, Abdallah & Ouhourane, Mohamed, 2013. "An extended variable inclusion and shrinkage algorithm for correlated variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 631-644.
    10. Lucian Belascu & Alexandra Horobet & Georgiana Vrinceanu & Consuela Popescu, 2021. "Performance Dissimilarities in European Union Manufacturing: The Effect of Ownership and Technological Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Candelon, B. & Hurlin, C. & Tokpavi, S., 2012. "Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 511-527.
    12. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Stefan Wager, 2018. "Approximate residual balancing: debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(4), pages 597-623, September.
    13. Andrea Carriero & Todd E. Clark & Massimiliano Marcellino, 2022. "Specification Choices in Quantile Regression for Empirical Macroeconomics," Working Papers 22-25, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    14. Kim, Hyun Hak & Swanson, Norman R., 2018. "Mining big data using parsimonious factor, machine learning, variable selection and shrinkage methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 339-354.
    15. Shuichi Kawano, 2014. "Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1207-1223, November.
    16. Yize Zhao & Matthias Chung & Brent A. Johnson & Carlos S. Moreno & Qi Long, 2016. "Hierarchical Feature Selection Incorporating Known and Novel Biological Information: Identifying Genomic Features Related to Prostate Cancer Recurrence," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1427-1439, October.
    17. Chuliá, Helena & Garrón, Ignacio & Uribe, Jorge M., 2024. "Daily growth at risk: Financial or real drivers? The answer is not always the same," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 762-776.
    18. Enrico Bergamini & Georg Zachmann, 2020. "Exploring EU’s Regional Potential in Low-Carbon Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    19. Jie Jian & Peijun Sang & Mu Zhu, 2024. "Two Gaussian Regularization Methods for Time-Varying Networks," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(4), pages 853-873, December.
    20. Qianyun Li & Runmin Shi & Faming Liang, 2019. "Drug sensitivity prediction with high-dimensional mixture regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:16:p:4074-:d:1457664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.