IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i12p2978-d1416348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Bio-Coke and Traditional Coke Production with Regard to the Technological Aspects and Carbon Footprint Considerations

Author

Listed:
  • Janusz Krupanek

    (Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, Kossutha 6, 40-844 Katowice, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Gałko

    (Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, Kossutha 6, 40-844 Katowice, Poland)

  • Marcin Sajdak

    (Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Marta Pogrzeba

    (Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, Kossutha 6, 40-844 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

In a world facing the challenges of climate change, it is imperative to prioritize the search for sustainable technical solutions. This study focuses on evaluating the environmental impact of using bio-coke compared to traditional metallurgical coke, employing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as the evaluation tool. Bio-coke, produced from a blend of coking coals enriched with biomass, offers greater environmental potential than traditional coke due to a reduced share of non-renewable raw materials. The steel and coking industries are significant contributors to carbon dioxide emissions. LCA provides a comprehensive assessment of the environmental impact of bio-based additives, considering raw material deliveries, the coking process, application in metallurgy, and product end-of-life disposal. The analysis results indicate that the use of biomass additives leads to lower greenhouse gas emissions compared to coke production without bio-additives. Given the urgency of addressing global warming and the increasing demand for sustainable energy sources, this study’s findings can advocate for bio-coke as a more environmentally friendly alternative to traditional coke in the steel industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Janusz Krupanek & Grzegorz Gałko & Marcin Sajdak & Marta Pogrzeba, 2024. "Comparison of Bio-Coke and Traditional Coke Production with Regard to the Technological Aspects and Carbon Footprint Considerations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2978-:d:1416348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2978/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2978/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Umeki, Kentaro & Mousa, Elsayed & Hedayati, Ali & Romar, Henrik & Kemppainen, Antti & Wang, Chuan & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Tuomikoski, Sari & Norberg, Nicklas & Andefors, Alf , 2018. "Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 384-407.
    2. Kang, Kang & Zhu, Mingqiang & Sun, Guotao & Qiu, Ling & Guo, Xiaohui & Meda, Venkatesh & Sun, Runcang, 2018. "Codensification of Eucommia ulmoides Oliver stem with pyrolysis oil and char for solid biofuel: An optimization and characterization study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 347-357.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mika Pahnila & Aki Koskela & Petri Sulasalmi & Timo Fabritius, 2023. "A Review of Pyrolysis Technologies and the Effect of Process Parameters on Biocarbon Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Adrian Knapczyk & Sławomir Francik & Marcin Jewiarz & Agnieszka Zawiślak & Renata Francik, 2020. "Thermal Treatment of Biomass: A Bibliometric Analysis—The Torrefaction Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, December.
    3. Song, Weiming & Zhou, Jianan & Li, Yujie & Yang, Jian & Cheng, Rijin, 2021. "New technology for producing high-quality combustible gas by high-temperature reaction of dust-removal coke powder in mixed atmosphere," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Chen, Qianqian & Gu, Yu & Tang, Zhiyong & Wei, Wei & Sun, Yuhan, 2018. "Assessment of low-carbon iron and steel production with CO2 recycling and utilization technologies: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 192-207.
    5. Suad Al Hosni & Marta Domini & Reza Vahidzadeh & Giorgio Bertanza, 2024. "Potential and Environmental Benefits of Biochar Utilization for Coal/Coke Substitution in the Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Skoczkowski, Tadeusz & Verdolini, Elena & Bielecki, Sławomir & Kochański, Max & Korczak, Katarzyna & Węglarz, Arkadiusz, 2020. "Technology innovation system analysis of decarbonisation options in the EU steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Riva, Lorenzo & Nielsen, Henrik Kofoed & Skreiberg, Øyvind & Wang, Liang & Bartocci, Pietro & Barbanera, Marco & Bidini, Gianni & Fantozzi, Francesco, 2019. "Analysis of optimal temperature, pressure and binder quantity for the production of biocarbon pellet to be used as a substitute for coke," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    8. Sandra Kiessling & Hamidreza Gohari Darabkhani & Abdel-Hamid Soliman, 2022. "The Bio Steel Cycle: 7 Steps to Net-Zero CO 2 Emissions Steel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Wang, R.Q. & Jiang, L. & Wang, Y.D. & Font-Palma, C. & Skoulou, V. & Roskilly, A.P., 2024. "Woody biomass waste derivatives in decarbonised blast furnace ironmaking process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Toloue Farrokh, Najibeh & Suopajärvi, Hannu & Mattila, Olli & Umeki, Kentaro & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Romar, Henrik & Sulasalmi, Petri & Fabritius, Timo, 2018. "Slow pyrolysis of by-product lignin from wood-based ethanol production– A detailed analysis of the produced chars," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 112-123.
    11. Ida Karlsson & Johan Rootzén & Alla Toktarova & Mikael Odenberger & Filip Johnsson & Lisa Göransson, 2020. "Roadmap for Decarbonization of the Building and Construction Industry—A Supply Chain Analysis Including Primary Production of Steel and Cement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-40, August.
    12. Sam Reis & Peter J. Holliman & Ciaran Martin & Eurig Jones, 2023. "Biomass–Coal Hybrid Fuel: A Route to Net-Zero Iron Ore Sintering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Dolf Gielen & Deger Saygin & Emanuele Taibi & Jean‐Pierre Birat, 2020. "Renewables‐based decarbonization and relocation of iron and steel making: A case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1113-1125, October.
    14. Ubando, Aristotle T. & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Ong, Hwai Chyuan, 2019. "Iron oxide reduction by graphite and torrefied biomass analyzed by TG-FTIR for mitigating CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 968-977.
    15. Nwachukwu, Chinedu M. & Toffolo, Andrea & Wetterlund, Elisabeth, 2020. "Biomass-based gas use in Swedish iron and steel industry – Supply chain and process integration considerations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2797-2811.
    16. Cheng, Zhilong & Tan, Zhoutuo & Guo, Zhigang & Yang, Jian & Wang, Qiuwang, 2020. "Recent progress in sustainable and energy-efficient technologies for sinter production in the iron and steel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Walmsley, Timothy Gordon & Philipp, Matthias & Picón-Núñez, Martín & Meschede, Henning & Taylor, Matthew Thomas & Schlosser, Florian & Atkins, Martin John, 2023. "Hybrid renewable energy utility systems for industrial sites: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    18. Gerrit Ralf Surup & Hamideh Kaffash & Yan Ma & Anna Trubetskaya & Johan Berg Pettersen & Merete Tangstad, 2022. "Life Cycle Based Climate Emissions of Charcoal Conditioning Routes for the Use in the Ferro-Alloy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, May.
    19. Julian Suer & Marzia Traverso & Nils Jäger, 2022. "Review of Life Cycle Assessments for Steel and Environmental Analysis of Future Steel Production Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Wang, Guangwei & Zhang, Jianliang & Lee, Jui-Yuan & Mao, Xiaoming & Ye, Lian & Xu, Wanren & Ning, Xiaojun & Zhang, Nan & Teng, Haipeng & Wang, Chuan, 2020. "Hydrothermal carbonization of maize straw for hydrochar production and its injection for blast furnace," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2978-:d:1416348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.