IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i12p2978-d1416348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Bio-Coke and Traditional Coke Production with Regard to the Technological Aspects and Carbon Footprint Considerations

Author

Listed:
  • Janusz Krupanek

    (Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, Kossutha 6, 40-844 Katowice, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Gałko

    (Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, Kossutha 6, 40-844 Katowice, Poland)

  • Marcin Sajdak

    (Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Marta Pogrzeba

    (Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, Kossutha 6, 40-844 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

In a world facing the challenges of climate change, it is imperative to prioritize the search for sustainable technical solutions. This study focuses on evaluating the environmental impact of using bio-coke compared to traditional metallurgical coke, employing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as the evaluation tool. Bio-coke, produced from a blend of coking coals enriched with biomass, offers greater environmental potential than traditional coke due to a reduced share of non-renewable raw materials. The steel and coking industries are significant contributors to carbon dioxide emissions. LCA provides a comprehensive assessment of the environmental impact of bio-based additives, considering raw material deliveries, the coking process, application in metallurgy, and product end-of-life disposal. The analysis results indicate that the use of biomass additives leads to lower greenhouse gas emissions compared to coke production without bio-additives. Given the urgency of addressing global warming and the increasing demand for sustainable energy sources, this study’s findings can advocate for bio-coke as a more environmentally friendly alternative to traditional coke in the steel industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Janusz Krupanek & Grzegorz Gałko & Marcin Sajdak & Marta Pogrzeba, 2024. "Comparison of Bio-Coke and Traditional Coke Production with Regard to the Technological Aspects and Carbon Footprint Considerations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2978-:d:1416348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2978/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2978/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Umeki, Kentaro & Mousa, Elsayed & Hedayati, Ali & Romar, Henrik & Kemppainen, Antti & Wang, Chuan & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Tuomikoski, Sari & Norberg, Nicklas & Andefors, Alf , 2018. "Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 384-407.
    2. Kang, Kang & Zhu, Mingqiang & Sun, Guotao & Qiu, Ling & Guo, Xiaohui & Meda, Venkatesh & Sun, Runcang, 2018. "Codensification of Eucommia ulmoides Oliver stem with pyrolysis oil and char for solid biofuel: An optimization and characterization study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 347-357.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mika Pahnila & Aki Koskela & Petri Sulasalmi & Timo Fabritius, 2023. "A Review of Pyrolysis Technologies and the Effect of Process Parameters on Biocarbon Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Adrian Knapczyk & Sławomir Francik & Marcin Jewiarz & Agnieszka Zawiślak & Renata Francik, 2020. "Thermal Treatment of Biomass: A Bibliometric Analysis—The Torrefaction Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, December.
    3. Song, Weiming & Zhou, Jianan & Li, Yujie & Yang, Jian & Cheng, Rijin, 2021. "New technology for producing high-quality combustible gas by high-temperature reaction of dust-removal coke powder in mixed atmosphere," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Suad Al Hosni & Marta Domini & Reza Vahidzadeh & Giorgio Bertanza, 2024. "Potential and Environmental Benefits of Biochar Utilization for Coal/Coke Substitution in the Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Skoczkowski, Tadeusz & Verdolini, Elena & Bielecki, Sławomir & Kochański, Max & Korczak, Katarzyna & Węglarz, Arkadiusz, 2020. "Technology innovation system analysis of decarbonisation options in the EU steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    6. Riva, Lorenzo & Nielsen, Henrik Kofoed & Skreiberg, Øyvind & Wang, Liang & Bartocci, Pietro & Barbanera, Marco & Bidini, Gianni & Fantozzi, Francesco, 2019. "Analysis of optimal temperature, pressure and binder quantity for the production of biocarbon pellet to be used as a substitute for coke," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    7. Ubando, Aristotle T. & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Ong, Hwai Chyuan, 2019. "Iron oxide reduction by graphite and torrefied biomass analyzed by TG-FTIR for mitigating CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 968-977.
    8. Walmsley, Timothy Gordon & Philipp, Matthias & Picón-Núñez, Martín & Meschede, Henning & Taylor, Matthew Thomas & Schlosser, Florian & Atkins, Martin John, 2023. "Hybrid renewable energy utility systems for industrial sites: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Gerrit Ralf Surup & Hamideh Kaffash & Yan Ma & Anna Trubetskaya & Johan Berg Pettersen & Merete Tangstad, 2022. "Life Cycle Based Climate Emissions of Charcoal Conditioning Routes for the Use in the Ferro-Alloy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, May.
    10. Wang, Guangwei & Zhang, Jianliang & Lee, Jui-Yuan & Mao, Xiaoming & Ye, Lian & Xu, Wanren & Ning, Xiaojun & Zhang, Nan & Teng, Haipeng & Wang, Chuan, 2020. "Hydrothermal carbonization of maize straw for hydrochar production and its injection for blast furnace," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    11. Riva, Lorenzo & Surup, Gerrit Ralf & Buø, Therese Videm & Nielsen, Henrik Kofoed, 2019. "A study of densified biochar as carbon source in the silicon and ferrosilicon production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 985-996.
    12. Riva, Lorenzo & Wang, Liang & Ravenni, Giulia & Bartocci, Pietro & Buø, Therese Videm & Skreiberg, Øyvind & Fantozzi, Francesco & Nielsen, Henrik Kofoed, 2021. "Considerations on factors affecting biochar densification behavior based on a multiparameter model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    13. Nwachukwu, Chinedu Maureen & Wang, Chuan & Wetterlund, Elisabeth, 2021. "Exploring the role of forest biomass in abating fossil CO2 emissions in the iron and steel industry – The case of Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    14. Guanyong Sun & Bin Li & Hanjie Guo & Wensheng Yang & Shaoying Li & Jing Guo, 2021. "Thermodynamic Study of Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Ironmaking Process of the Reduction of Iron Oxides by Carbon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, April.
    15. Cheng, Long & Wu, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Zhiguo & Guo, Changqing & Ellis, Naoko & Bi, Xiaotao & Paul Watkinson, A. & Grace, John R., 2020. "Tar elimination from biomass gasification syngas with bauxite residue derived catalysts and gasification char," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    16. Aekjuthon Phounglamcheik & Nils Johnson & Norbert Kienzl & Christoph Strasser & Kentaro Umeki, 2022. "Self-Heating of Biochar during Postproduction Storage by O 2 Chemisorption at Low Temperatures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, January.
    17. Chen, Qianqian & Gu, Yu & Tang, Zhiyong & Wei, Wei & Sun, Yuhan, 2018. "Assessment of low-carbon iron and steel production with CO2 recycling and utilization technologies: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 192-207.
    18. Sandra Kiessling & Hamidreza Gohari Darabkhani & Abdel-Hamid Soliman, 2022. "The Bio Steel Cycle: 7 Steps to Net-Zero CO 2 Emissions Steel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Wang, R.Q. & Jiang, L. & Wang, Y.D. & Font-Palma, C. & Skoulou, V. & Roskilly, A.P., 2024. "Woody biomass waste derivatives in decarbonised blast furnace ironmaking process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Toloue Farrokh, Najibeh & Suopajärvi, Hannu & Mattila, Olli & Umeki, Kentaro & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Romar, Henrik & Sulasalmi, Petri & Fabritius, Timo, 2018. "Slow pyrolysis of by-product lignin from wood-based ethanol production– A detailed analysis of the produced chars," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 112-123.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2978-:d:1416348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.