IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2023i1p157-d1308827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects and Driving Factors of Low-Carbon Transition of International Oil Companies: Evidence from a Super-SBM Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xuwei Tang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
    CNPC Economics and Technology Research Institute, Beijing 100120, China)

  • Qi Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
    Tianshan Research Institute, Xinjiang 834000, China)

  • Chunxin Li

    (CNPC Economics and Technology Research Institute, Beijing 100120, China)

  • Haitao Zhang

    (CNPC Managers Training Institute, Beijing 100096, China)

  • Haiyun Xu

    (Petrochina Natural Gas Marketing Company, Beijing 100007, China)

Abstract

As the main source of energy supply and carbon emissions, the oil and gas industry has entered the comprehensive low-carbon transition stage driven by various factors. Since different oil companies possess distinct understandings of transition paths, the effect of low carbon transition varies greatly. Obviously, it is necessary to evaluate the performance of low-carbon transitions within the oil and gas industry. Therefore, in this paper, 10 major international oil companies are taken as examples, and a super-efficiency slack-based measurement (super-SBM) model is applied in the present study to analyze the efficiency of low-carbon transitions. Furthermore, the logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) is used to decompose the driving factors of carbon emissions and analyze their impact on the low-carbon transition of international oil companies. The obtained results reveal that although major oil companies have taken different measures in low-carbon transition and achieved a year-on-year reduction in carbon emissions, from the perspective of the efficiency of the entire production and operation process, these oil companies are inefficient in carbon emissions and need to adopt more effective low-carbon transition strategies; Moreover, after the further decomposition of the carbon emission driving factors of the 10 companies, it is found that improving the energy consumption intensity and development level of oil companies can effectively improve the effect of low-carbon transition of international oil companies. Drawing on the above findings, this paper puts forward suggestions for the low-carbon transition of energy companies, thus providing theoretical support and guidance for energy companies in different countries to implement low-carbon transition and green development strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuwei Tang & Qi Zhang & Chunxin Li & Haitao Zhang & Haiyun Xu, 2023. "The Effects and Driving Factors of Low-Carbon Transition of International Oil Companies: Evidence from a Super-SBM Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:157-:d:1308827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, Sieting & Yang, Jin & Yan, Jinyue & Lee, Chewtin & Hashim, Haslenda & Chen, Bin, 2017. "A holistic low carbon city indicator framework for sustainable development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1919-1930.
    2. Li, Zhengbing & Liang, Yongtu & Ni, Weilong & Liao, Qi & Xu, Ning & Li, Lichao & Zheng, Jianqin & Zhang, Haoran, 2022. "Pipesharing: economic-environmental benefits from transporting biofuels through multiproduct pipelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    3. Mohammad S. Masnadi & Adam R. Brandt, 2017. "Climate impacts of oil extraction increase significantly with oilfield age," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 551-556, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guorong Chen & Changyan Liu, 2023. "Can Low–Carbon City Development Stimulate Population Growth? Insights from China’s Low–Carbon Pilot Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Longyu Shi & Xueqin Xiang & Wei Zhu & Lijie Gao, 2018. "Standardization of the Evaluation Index System for Low-Carbon Cities in China: A Case Study of Xiamen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Xing Zhang, 2018. "Short-Term Load Forecasting for Electric Bus Charging Stations Based on Fuzzy Clustering and Least Squares Support Vector Machine Optimized by Wolf Pack Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Garafutdinova Daniya & Decai Tang, 2024. "Green Finance and Industrial Low-Carbon Transition: A Case Study on Green Economy Policy in Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Jiang, Hongdian & Dong, Xiucheng & Jiang, Qingzhe & Dong, Kangyin, 2020. "What drives China's natural gas consumption? Analysis of national and regional estimates," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Mageswaran Rengasamy & Sivasankar Gangatharan & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Lucian Mihet-Popa, 2020. "The Motivation for Incorporation of Microgrid Technology in Rooftop Solar Photovoltaic Deployment to Enhance Energy Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-27, December.
    7. Huang, Ying & Liao, Cuiping & Zhang, Jingjing & Guo, Hongxu & Zhou, Nan & Zhao, Daiqing, 2019. "Exploring potential pathways towards urban greenhouse gas peaks: A case study of Guangzhou, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Liu, Jiahong & Wang, Jia & Ding, Xiangyi & Shao, Weiwei & Mei, Chao & Li, Zejin & Wang, Kaibo, 2020. "Assessing the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from a green infrastructure-based urban drainage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    9. Yan Zhao & Hui Sun & Xuechao Xia & Dianyuan Ma, 2023. "Can R&D Intensity Reduce Carbon Emissions Intensity? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Sharma, A. & Bhakar, R. & Tiwari, H.P. & Li, R. & Li, F., 2017. "A novel hierarchical contribution factor based model for distribution use-of-system charges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 996-1006.
    11. Lijie Gao & Xiaoqi Shang & Fengmei Yang & Longyu Shi, 2021. "A Dynamic Benchmark System for Per Capita Carbon Emissions in Low-Carbon Counties of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Li, Shengnan & Zheng, Xinya & Liao, Jing & Niu, Jianbo, 2024. "Low-carbon city pilot policy and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 1248-1266.
    13. Liu, Yishuang & Huang, Jinpeng & Xu, Jianxiang & Xiong, Shufei, 2024. "Natural resource dependence and sustainable development policy: Insights from city-level analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Hu, Guangxiao & Ma, Xiaoming & Ji, Junping, 2019. "Scenarios and policies for sustainable urban energy development based on LEAP model – A case study of a postindustrial city: Shenzhen China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 876-886.
    15. Kun Chen & Yinrong Chen & Qingying Zhu & Min Liu, 2022. "The Relationship between Environmental Regulation, Industrial Transformation Change and Urban Low-Carbon Development: Evidence from 282 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Li, Wenxiang & Bao, Lei & Wang, Luqi & Li, Ye & Mai, Xianmin, 2019. "Comparative evaluation of global low-carbon urban transport," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 14-26.
    17. Wang, Delu & Tong, Xian & Wang, Yadong, 2020. "An early risk warning system for Outward Foreign Direct Investment in Mineral Resource-based enterprises using multi-classifiers fusion," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    18. Jian Song & Jing Wang & Zhe Chen, 2022. "How Low-Carbon Pilots Affect Chinese Urban Energy Efficiency: An Explanation from Technological Progress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-30, November.
    19. Yingjie Zhu & Yinghui Guo & Yongfa Chen & Jiageng Ma & Dan Zhang, 2024. "Factors Influencing Carbon Emission and Low-Carbon Development Levels in Shandong Province: Method Analysis Based on Improved Random Forest Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model and Entropy ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Juan Yin & Jin Guo, 2022. "Ecological Effect Assessment of Low-Carbon City Construction in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:157-:d:1308827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.