IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i5p2333-d1083564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Energy Consumption Characteristics of Ultra-Heavy-Duty Vehicles under Real Driving Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Seongin Jo

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hyung Jun Kim

    (National Institute of Environmental Research, 42 Hwangyeong-ro, Seo-gu, Inchon 22689, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sang Il Kwon

    (National Institute of Environmental Research, 42 Hwangyeong-ro, Seo-gu, Inchon 22689, Republic of Korea)

  • Jong Tae Lee

    (National Institute of Environmental Research, 42 Hwangyeong-ro, Seo-gu, Inchon 22689, Republic of Korea)

  • Suhan Park

    (School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Passenger cars account for the largest share of GHG emissions in the road sector. However, given that the number of heavy-duty vehicles registered is lower but accounts for about a quarter of GHG emissions in the road sector, it is necessary to reduce carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions by improving the fuel efficiency of heavy-duty vehicles. However, experiments using dynamometers during the vehicle development process consume a lot of time and cost. Conversely, simulations can quantitatively analyze the sensitivity of parameters and accelerate optimization. Therefore, in this study, we modeled a heavy-duty vehicle using an AVL Cruise simulation and analyzed the effects of payload, air drag coefficient, and rolling resistance on fuel economy, CO 2 emission, and the valid window ratio among the moving average window (MAW) for three driving routes. When the average vehicle speed was higher, the effect of the air drag coefficient on fuel economy was high. Additionally, when the average vehicle speed was lowered, the effect of the reduced rolling resistance on improving fuel efficiency was higher than that of the reducing air drag. Thus, the fuel efficiency improvement rate according to each 10% decrease in rolling resistance was higher by 2.2%, on average, in the low average speed route. Additionally, it was confirmed that the valid window ratio was high when driving in a section with a high vehicle speed first. Thus, the valid window ratio was almost 100% in the test of the route conditions starting from the highway section.

Suggested Citation

  • Seongin Jo & Hyung Jun Kim & Sang Il Kwon & Jong Tae Lee & Suhan Park, 2023. "Assessment of Energy Consumption Characteristics of Ultra-Heavy-Duty Vehicles under Real Driving Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2333-:d:1083564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2333/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2333/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabella Yunfei Zeng & Shiqi Tan & Jianliang Xiong & Xuesong Ding & Yawen Li & Tian Wu, 2021. "Estimation of Real-World Fuel Consumption Rate of Light-Duty Vehicles Based on the Records Reported by Vehicle Owners," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Su, Sheng & Ge, Yang & Hou, Pan & Wang, Xin & Wang, Yachao & Lyu, Tao & Luo, Wanyou & Lai, Yitu & Ge, Yunshan & Lyu, Liqun, 2021. "China VI heavy-duty moving average window (MAW) method: Quantitative analysis of the problem, causes, and impacts based on the real driving data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    3. Sasanka Katreddi & Arvind Thiruvengadam, 2021. "Trip Based Modeling of Fuel Consumption in Modern Heavy-Duty Vehicles Using Artificial Intelligence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vasyl Mateichyk & Nataliia Kostian & Miroslaw Smieszek & Igor Gritsuk & Valerii Verbovskyi, 2023. "Review of Methods for Evaluating the Energy Efficiency of Vehicles with Conventional and Alternative Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-25, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dengfeng Zhao & Haiyang Li & Junjian Hou & Pengliang Gong & Yudong Zhong & Wenbin He & Zhijun Fu, 2023. "A Review of the Data-Driven Prediction Method of Vehicle Fuel Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Sasanka Katreddi & Sujan Kasani & Arvind Thiruvengadam, 2022. "A Review of Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Heavy Duty Trucks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Wang, Yachao & Yin, Hang & Yang, Zhengjun & Su, Sheng & Hao, Lijun & Tan, Jianwei & Wang, Xin & Niu, Zhihui & Ge, Yunshan, 2022. "Assessing the brake particle emissions for sustainable transport: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Lyu, Liqun & Wang, Junfang & Yin, Hang & Ji, Zhongrui & Tan, Jianwei & Hao, Lijun & Ge, Yunshan, 2024. "Accelerated aging for after-treatment devices of diesel engine: Method, emission characteristics, and equivalence," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    5. Yushan Yang & Nuoya Gong & Keying Xie & Qingfei Liu, 2022. "Predicting Gasoline Vehicle Fuel Consumption in Energy and Environmental Impact Based on Machine Learning and Multidimensional Big Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2333-:d:1083564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.