IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i5p2279-d1081906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Array Design for Hydrokinetic Turbines in Hydropower Canals

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Cacciali

    (Turbomachinery Laboratory, Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Via Mesiano 77, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Lorenzo Battisti

    (Turbomachinery Laboratory, Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Via Mesiano 77, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Sergio Dell’Anna

    (Turbomachinery Laboratory, Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Via Mesiano 77, 38123 Trento, Italy)

Abstract

The design of hydrokinetic plants in hydropower canals involves the choice of the array layout, rotor geometry, turbine spacing, and array spacing, and necessitates the control of the resultant backwater to avoid upstream flooding hazards. Several works in the literature have shown that array power optimization is feasible with small spacings between the arrays, disregarding the limitation in the power output induced by backwater upstream. In this study, a 1-D channel model with a Double Multiple Streamtube code and wake sub-models are integrated to predict an array layout that will maximize the array power. The outputs of the conducted sensitivity analysis confirm that this design enabled improved power conversion with closely spaced turbines and largely spaced arrays, thus allowing for a partial recovery of the total head variation for a new array deployed upstream. In addition to the quantitative assessment of the mechanical power converted, the tool enables depth control from the downstream undisturbed flow station to the backwater exhaustion far upstream, thereby increasing its flexibility. Furthermore, it overcomes the limitations of actuator disc models by considering rotor’s fluid dynamic losses. The results show that power output linearly scales for a limited number of arrays (≤5), whilst the variation in water depth variation follows a power law from the most downstream array towards upstream, regardless of the plant size. Finally, the maximum upstream inflow depth is demonstrated to become asymptotic for large multi-array plants under ideal conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Cacciali & Lorenzo Battisti & Sergio Dell’Anna, 2023. "Multi-Array Design for Hydrokinetic Turbines in Hydropower Canals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2279-:d:1081906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Yue & Packey, Daniel J., 2014. "Combined-cycle hydropower systems – The potential of applying hydrokinetic turbines in the tailwaters of existing conventional hydropower stations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 228-231.
    2. Ridgill, Michael & Neill, Simon P. & Lewis, Matt J. & Robins, Peter E. & Patil, Sopan D., 2021. "Global riverine theoretical hydrokinetic resource assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 654-665.
    3. Okulov, V.L. & Naumov, I.V. & Kabardin, I.K. & Litvinov, I.V. & Markovich, D.M. & Mikkelsen, R.F. & Sørensen, J.N. & Alekseenko, S.V. & Wood, D.H., 2021. "Experiments on line arrays of horizontal-axis hydroturbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 15-21.
    4. Vennell, Ross & Funke, Simon W. & Draper, Scott & Stevens, Craig & Divett, Tim, 2015. "Designing large arrays of tidal turbines: A synthesis and review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 454-472.
    5. González-Gorbeña, Eduardo & Qassim, Raad Y. & Rosman, Paulo C.C., 2016. "Optimisation of hydrokinetic turbine array layouts via surrogate modelling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 45-57.
    6. Gauvin-Tremblay, Olivier & Dumas, Guy, 2022. "Hydrokinetic turbine array analysis and optimization integrating blockage effects and turbine-wake interactions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 851-869.
    7. Riglin, Jacob & Daskiran, Cosan & Jonas, Joseph & Schleicher, W. Chris & Oztekin, Alparslan, 2016. "Hydrokinetic turbine array characteristics for river applications and spatially restricted flows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 274-283.
    8. Kartezhnikova, Maria & Ravens, Thomas M., 2014. "Hydraulic impacts of hydrokinetic devices," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 425-432.
    9. Vogel, C.R. & Houlsby, G.T. & Willden, R.H.J., 2016. "Effect of free surface deformation on the extractable power of a finite width turbine array," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 317-324.
    10. d’Auteuil, Samuel & Birjandi, Amir & Bibeau, Eric & Jordan, Scott & Soviak, Jody & Friesen, David, 2019. "Riverine hydrokinetic resource assessment using low cost winter imagery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 293-300.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mendes, Rafael C.F. & Chapui, Benoit & Oliveira, Taygoara F. & Noguera, Ricardo & Brasil, Antonio C.P., 2024. "Flow through horizontal axis propeller turbines in a triangular array," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Andrés Chalaca & Laura Velásquez & Ainhoa Rubio-Clemente & Edwin Chica, 2024. "Design and Optimization of a Gorlov-Type Hydrokinetic Turbine Array for Energy Generation Using Response Surface Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Segura, E. & Morales, R. & Somolinos, J.A., 2018. "A strategic analysis of tidal current energy conversion systems in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 527-551.
    4. Holanda, Patrícia da Silva & Blanco, Claudio José Cavalcante & Mesquita, André Luiz Amarante & Brasil Junior, Antônio César Pinho & de Figueiredo, Nelio Moura & Macêdo, Emanuel Negrão & Secretan, Yves, 2017. "Assessment of hydrokinetic energy resources downstream of hydropower plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1203-1214.
    5. Barbarelli, Silvio & Florio, Gaetano & Lo Zupone, Giacomo & Scornaienchi, Nino Michele, 2018. "First techno-economic evaluation of array configuration of self-balancing tidal kinetic turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 183-200.
    6. González-Gorbeña, Eduardo & Pacheco, André & Plomaritis, Theocharis A. & Ferreira, Óscar & Sequeira, Cláudia, 2018. "Estimating the optimum size of a tidal array at a multi-inlet system considering environmental and performance constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 292-311.
    7. Niebuhr, C.M. & van Dijk, M. & Neary, V.S. & Bhagwan, J.N., 2019. "A review of hydrokinetic turbines and enhancement techniques for canal installations: Technology, applicability and potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Brown, Erik & Sulaeman, Samer & Quispe-Abad, Raul & Müller, Norbert & Moran, Emilio, 2023. "Safe passage for fish: The case for in-stream turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Lo Brutto, Ottavio A. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Gualous, Hamid, 2016. "A semi-analytic method to optimize tidal farm layouts – Application to the Alderney Race (Raz Blanchard), France," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1168-1180.
    10. Laws, Nicholas D. & Epps, Brenden P., 2016. "Hydrokinetic energy conversion: Technology, research, and outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1245-1259.
    11. Santos, Ivan Felipe Silva dos & Camacho, Ramiro Gustavo Ramirez & Tiago Filho, Geraldo Lúcio & Botan, Antonio Carlos Barkett & Vinent, Barbara Amoeiro, 2019. "Energy potential and economic analysis of hydrokinetic turbines implementation in rivers: An approach using numerical predictions (CFD) and experimental data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 648-662.
    12. Chen, Yaling & Lin, Binliang & Liang, Dongfang, 2023. "Interactions between approaching flow and hydrokinetic turbines in a staggered layout," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    13. Zhang, Yidan & Shek, Jonathan K.H. & Mueller, Markus A., 2023. "Controller design for a tidal turbine array, considering both power and loads aspects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    14. Wilding, Thomas A. & Gill, Andrew B. & Boon, Arjen & Sheehan, Emma & Dauvin, Jean–Claude & Pezy, Jean-Philippe & O’Beirn, Francis & Janas, Urszula & Rostin, Liis & De Mesel, Ilse, 2017. "Turning off the DRIP (‘Data-rich, information-poor’) – rationalising monitoring with a focus on marine renewable energy developments and the benthos," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 848-859.
    15. Brown, Eloise J. & King, Amanda L. & Duvoy, Paul X. & Trochim, Erin & Kasper, Jeremy L. & Wilson, Melany L. & Ravens, Thomas M., 2023. "Site suitability analysis of hydrokinetic river energy resources at community microgrids on the Kuskokwim River, Alaska," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    16. Almoghayer, Mohammed A. & Woolf, David K. & Kerr, Sandy & Davies, Gareth, 2022. "Integration of tidal energy into an island energy system – A case study of Orkney islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    17. Quaranta, Emanuele & Muntean, Sebastian, 2023. "Wasted and excess energy in the hydropower sector: A European assessment of tailrace hydrokinetic potential, degassing-methane capture and waste-heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    18. Fox, Clive J. & Benjamins, Steven & Masden, Elizabeth A. & Miller, Raeanne, 2018. "Challenges and opportunities in monitoring the impacts of tidal-stream energy devices on marine vertebrates," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1926-1938.
    19. Patel, Vimal & Eldho, T.I. & Prabhu, S.V., 2019. "Velocity and performance correction methodology for hydrokinetic turbines experimented with different geometry of the channel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1300-1317.
    20. Maduka, Maduka & Li, Chi Wai, 2022. "Experimental evaluation of power performance and wake characteristics of twin flanged duct turbines in tandem under bi-directional tidal flows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1543-1567.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2279-:d:1081906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.