IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p1174-d742557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating System and Operator Perspectives for the Evaluation of Power-to-Gas Plants in the Future German Energy System

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Schaffert

    (Gas-und Wärme-Institut Essen e.V. (GWI), 45356 Essen, Germany)

  • Hans Christian Gils

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, 70563 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Max Fette

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials IFAM, 28359 Bremen, Germany)

  • Hedda Gardian

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, 70563 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Christine Brandstätt

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials IFAM, 28359 Bremen, Germany)

  • Thomas Pregger

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, 70563 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Nils Brücken

    (Gas-und Wärme-Institut Essen e.V. (GWI), 45356 Essen, Germany)

  • Eren Tali

    (Gas-und Wärme-Institut Essen e.V. (GWI), 45356 Essen, Germany)

  • Marc Fiebrandt

    (Gas-und Wärme-Institut Essen e.V. (GWI), 45356 Essen, Germany)

  • Rolf Albus

    (Gas-und Wärme-Institut Essen e.V. (GWI), 45356 Essen, Germany)

  • Frank Burmeister

    (Gas-und Wärme-Institut Essen e.V. (GWI), 45356 Essen, Germany)

Abstract

In which way, and in which sectors, will renewable energy be integrated in the German Energy System by 2030, 2040, and 2050? How can the resulting energy system be characterised following a −95% greenhouse gas emission reduction scenario? Which role will hydrogen play? To address these research questions, techno-economic energy system modelling was performed. Evaluation of the resulting operation of energy technologies was carried out from a system and a business point of view. Special consideration of gas technologies, such as hydrogen production, transport, and storage, was taken as a large-scale and long-term energy storage option and key enabler for the decarbonisation of the non-electric sectors. The broad set of results gives insight into the entangled interactions of the future energy technology portfolio and its operation within a coupled energy system. Amongst other energy demands, CO 2 emissions, hydrogen production, and future power plant capacities are presented. One main conclusion is that integrating the first elements of a large-scale hydrogen infrastructure into the German energy system, already, by 2030 is necessary for ensuring the supply of upscaling demands across all sectors. Within the regulatory regime of 2020, it seems that this decision may come too late, which jeopardises the achievement of transition targets within the horizon 2050.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Schaffert & Hans Christian Gils & Max Fette & Hedda Gardian & Christine Brandstätt & Thomas Pregger & Nils Brücken & Eren Tali & Marc Fiebrandt & Rolf Albus & Frank Burmeister, 2022. "Integrating System and Operator Perspectives for the Evaluation of Power-to-Gas Plants in the Future German Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1174-:d:742557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hauser, Philipp & Heinrichs, Heidi U. & Gillessen, Bastian & Müller, Theresa, 2018. "Implications of diversification strategies in the European natural gas market for the German energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 442-454.
    2. Li, Xinyu & Mulder, Machiel, 2021. "Value of power-to-gas as a flexibility option in integrated electricity and hydrogen markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    3. van Leeuwen, Charlotte & Mulder, Machiel, 2018. "Power-to-gas in electricity markets dominated by renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 258-272.
    4. Gils, Hans Christian & Simon, Sonja, 2017. "Carbon neutral archipelago – 100% renewable energy supply for the Canary Islands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 342-355.
    5. Gils, Hans Christian & Scholz, Yvonne & Pregger, Thomas & Luca de Tena, Diego & Heide, Dominik, 2017. "Integrated modelling of variable renewable energy-based power supply in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 173-188.
    6. Heide, Dominik & von Bremen, Lueder & Greiner, Martin & Hoffmann, Clemens & Speckmann, Markus & Bofinger, Stefan, 2010. "Seasonal optimal mix of wind and solar power in a future, highly renewable Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 2483-2489.
    7. Farrokhifar, Meisam & Nie, Yinghui & Pozo, David, 2020. "Energy systems planning: A survey on models for integrated power and natural gas networks coordination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    8. Heide, Dominik & Greiner, Martin & von Bremen, Lüder & Hoffmann, Clemens, 2011. "Reduced storage and balancing needs in a fully renewable European power system with excess wind and solar power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2515-2523.
    9. Laura Torralba-Díaz & Christoph Schimeczek & Matthias Reeg & Georgios Savvidis & Marc Deissenroth-Uhrig & Felix Guthoff & Benjamin Fleischer & Kai Hufendiek, 2020. "Identification of the Efficiency Gap by Coupling a Fundamental Electricity Market Model and an Agent-Based Simulation Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Thema, M. & Bauer, F. & Sterner, M., 2019. "Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 775-787.
    11. Kabirian, Alireza & Hemmati, Mohammad Reza, 2007. "A strategic planning model for natural gas transmission networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5656-5670, November.
    12. Brown, T. & Schlachtberger, D. & Kies, A. & Schramm, S. & Greiner, M., 2018. "Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 720-739.
    13. Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Schmugge, Jens, 2021. "Interaction of hydrogen infrastructures with other sector coupling options towards a zero-emission energy system in Germany," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 140-156.
    14. Gorre, Jachin & Ruoss, Fabian & Karjunen, Hannu & Schaffert, Johannes & Tynjälä, Tero, 2020. "Cost benefits of optimizing hydrogen storage and methanation capacities for Power-to-Gas plants in dynamic operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2024. "Role of smart charging of electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid in integrated renewables-based energy systems on country level," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hansen, Kenneth & Breyer, Christian & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Status and perspectives on 100% renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 471-480.
    2. Gawlick, Julia & Hamacher, Thomas, 2023. "Impact of coupling the electricity and hydrogen sector in a zero-emission European energy system in 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Fehler, Alexander & Gaumnitz, Felix & van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Bußa, 2022. "Modeling flexibility in energy systems — comparison of power sector models based on simplified test cases," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Child, Michael & Kemfert, Claudia & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2019. "Flexible electricity generation, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 139, pages 80-101.
    5. Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Gaumnitz, Felix & van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Mikurda, Jennifer & Torralba-Díaz, Laura, 2022. "Model-related outcome differences in power system models with sector coupling—Quantification and drivers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Maeder, Mattia & Weiss, Olga & Boulouchos, Konstantinos, 2021. "Assessing the need for flexibility technologies in decarbonized power systems: A new model applied to Central Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    7. Corey Duncan & Robin Roche & Samir Jemei & Marie-Cécile Péra, 2022. "Techno-economical modelling of a power-to-gas system for plant configuration evaluation in a local context," Post-Print hal-03692975, HAL.
    8. Mads Raunbak & Timo Zeyer & Kun Zhu & Martin Greiner, 2017. "Principal Mismatch Patterns Across a Simplified Highly Renewable European Electricity Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    9. Gaure, Simen & Golombek, Rolf, 2022. "True or not true: CO2 free electricity generation is possible," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    10. Schyska, Bruno U. & Kies, Alexander, 2020. "How regional differences in cost of capital influence the optimal design of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    11. Niklas Wulff & Felix Steck & Hans Christian Gils & Carsten Hoyer-Klick & Bent van den Adel & John E. Anderson, 2020. "Comparing Power-System and User-Oriented Battery Electric Vehicle Charging Representation and Its Implications on Energy System Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-41, March.
    12. Solomon, A.A. & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2019. "Curtailment-storage-penetration nexus in the energy transition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1351-1368.
    13. Rishabh Agarwal, 2022. "Economic Analysis of Renewable Power-to-Gas in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Xiong, Bobby & Predel, Johannes & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud, 2021. "Spatial flexibility in redispatch: Supporting low carbon energy systems with Power-to-Gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    15. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Landon, Robert Stephen & Kim, Jeongdong & Liu, Yi & Moon, Il, 2022. "Continuous and flexible Renewable-Power-to-Methane via liquid CO2 energy storage: Revisiting the techno-economic potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    16. Finke, Jonas & Bertsch, Valentin, 2023. "Implementing a highly adaptable method for the multi-objective optimisation of energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    17. Masoud Khatibi & Abbas Rabiee & Amir Bagheri, 2023. "Integrated Electricity and Gas Systems Planning: New Opportunities, and a Detailed Assessment of Relevant Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, April.
    18. Drücke, Jaqueline & Borsche, Michael & James, Paul & Kaspar, Frank & Pfeifroth, Uwe & Ahrens, Bodo & Trentmann, Jörg, 2021. "Climatological analysis of solar and wind energy in Germany using the Grosswetterlagen classification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1254-1266.
    19. Li, Li & Wang, Jing & Zhong, Xiaoyi & Lin, Jian & Wu, Nianyuan & Zhang, Zhihui & Meng, Chao & Wang, Xiaonan & Shah, Nilay & Brandon, Nigel & Xie, Shan & Zhao, Yingru, 2022. "Combined multi-objective optimization and agent-based modeling for a 100% renewable island energy system considering power-to-gas technology and extreme weather conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    20. Schlachtberger, D.P. & Brown, T. & Schäfer, M. & Schramm, S. & Greiner, M., 2018. "Cost optimal scenarios of a future highly renewable European electricity system: Exploring the influence of weather data, cost parameters and policy constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 100-114.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1174-:d:742557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.