IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v149y2024icp36-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fleet operator perspectives on alternative fuels for heavy-duty vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Bae, Youngeun
  • Rindt, Craig R.
  • Mitra, Suman Kumar
  • Ritchie, Stephen G.

Abstract

Despite the deployment of alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) being one of the promising measures to reduce air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions, AFVs still represent a very small share in the heavy-duty vehicle (HDV) sector. Understanding HDV fleet operator perspectives on alternative fuels is critical to developing effective demand-side strategies to facilitate wider and more rapid adoption of heavy-duty AFVs. This study explored California HDV fleet operator perspectives on viable alternative fuel options in the next 10–20 years, along with motivators for, and barriers to, such adoption. Eighteen in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted, after which thematic analysis was employed to analyze the interview data. Electric, hydrogen, compressed natural gas (CNG), and hybrid options were commonly perceived as viable in the 2030s by the participating organizations. Various optimistic aspects were addressed, including advanced technologies and emission reduction benefits (electric/hydrogen), continued fuel commitments due to their fleet or infrastructure investments already made (CNG), and lower complexity in fleet routing along with favorable driver acceptance (hybrid options). However, many concerns and uncertainties were also reported, including functional unsuitability (electric), uncompetitive upfront costs (hydrogen), unready infrastructure, perceived unavailability of vehicles, uncertain return on investment (electric/hydrogen), and unpromising support from state government (CNG). The study findings help fill a key knowledge gap in AFV fleet adoption research regarding HDV fleet operator perspectives, and contribute to developing demand-side strategies to aid the success of AFV diffusion throughout the HDV market.

Suggested Citation

  • Bae, Youngeun & Rindt, Craig R. & Mitra, Suman Kumar & Ritchie, Stephen G., 2024. "Fleet operator perspectives on alternative fuels for heavy-duty vehicles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 36-48.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:149:y:2024:i:c:p:36-48
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.01.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24000313
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.01.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parker, R. Stephen & Fletchall, Heather & Pettijohn, Charles E., 1997. "Truck operators' perspectives on use of alternative fuels," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 73-78, March.
    2. Pfoser, Sarah & Schauer, Oliver & Costa, Yasel, 2018. "Acceptance of LNG as an alternative fuel: Determinants and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 259-267.
    3. Nesbitt, Kevin & Sperling, Daniel, 2001. "Fleet Purchase Behavior: Decision Processes and Implications for New Vehicle Technologies and Fuels," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt15k63162, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Seitz, Claudio S. & Beuttenmüller, Oliver & Terzidis, Orestis, 2015. "Organizational adoption behavior of CO2-saving power train technologies: An empirical study on the German heavy-duty vehicles market," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 247-262.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Demeulenaere, Xavier, 2019. "The use of automotive fleets to support the diffusion of Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Rapid Evidence Assessment of barriers and decision mechanisms," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Alali, Layla & Niesten, Eva & Gagliardi, Dimitri, 2022. "The impact of UK financial incentives on the adoption of electric fleets: The moderation effect of GDP change," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 200-220.
    3. Konstantinou, Theodora & Gkritza, Konstantina, 2023. "Are we getting close to truck electrification? U.S. truck fleet managers’ stated intentions to electrify their fleets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Konstantina Peloriadi & Petros Iliadis & Panagiotis Boutikos & Konstantinos Atsonios & Panagiotis Grammelis & Aristeidis Nikolopoulos, 2022. "Technoeconomic Assessment of LNG-Fueled Solid Oxide Fuel Cells in Small Island Systems: The Patmos Island Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Kurani, Kenneth S & Miller, Marshall & Sugihara, Claire & Stepnitz, Eli-Alston & Nesbitt, Kevin A, 2023. "Determinants of Medium- and Heavy-Duty Truck Fleet Turnover," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt20n8n4mb, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    6. Globisch, Joachim & Dütschke, Elisabeth & Schleich, Joachim, 2018. "Acceptance of electric passenger cars in commercial fleets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 122-129.
    7. Zhang, Yong & Yu, Yifeng & Zou, Bai, 2011. "Analyzing public awareness and acceptance of alternative fuel vehicles in China: The case of EV," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7015-7024.
    8. Khan, Shakil & Maoh, Hanna, 2022. "Investigating attitudes towards fleet electrification – An exploratory analysis approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 188-205.
    9. Giovanni Gaetano Gianetti & Tommaso Lucchini & Gianluca D’Errico & Angelo Onorati & Patrik Soltic, 2023. "Development and Validation of a CFD Combustion Model for Natural Gas Engines Operating with Different Piston Bowls," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
    10. Dincbas, Tugba & Ergeneli, Azize & Yigitbasioglu, Hakan, 2021. "Clean technology adoption in the context of climate change: Application in the mineral products industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    11. Vladimír Hönig & Petr Prochazka & Michal Obergruber & Luboš Smutka & Viera Kučerová, 2019. "Economic and Technological Analysis of Commercial LNG Production in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Ingo Kastner & Annalena Becker & Sebastian Bobeth & Ellen Matthies, 2021. "Are Professionals Rationals? How Organizations and Households Make E-Car Investments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Koyuncu, Işıl & Yavuz, Mesut, 2019. "Duplicating nodes or arcs in green vehicle routing: A computational comparison of two formulations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 605-623.
    14. Michels, Marius & Bonke, Vanessa & Wever, Hendrik & Musshoff, Oliver, 2024. "Understanding farmers' intention to buy alternative fuel tractors in German agriculture applying the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    15. Atienza-Márquez, Antonio & Bruno, Joan Carles & Akisawa, Atsushi & Coronas, Alberto, 2019. "Performance analysis of a combined cold and power (CCP) system with exergy recovery from LNG-regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 448-461.
    16. Davide Borelli & Francesco Devia & Corrado Schenone & Federico Silenzi & Luca A. Tagliafico, 2021. "Dynamic Modelling of LNG Powered Combined Energy Systems in Port Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Martin Jurkovič & Tomáš Kalina & Ondrej Stopka & Piotr Gorzelanczyk & Borna Abramović, 2021. "Economic Calculation and Operations Research in Terms of LNG Carriage by Water Transport: A Case Study of the Port of Bratislava," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Mahlia, T.M.I. & Tohno, S. & Tezuka, T., 2012. "A review on fuel economy test procedure for automobiles: Implementation possibilities in Malaysia and lessons for other countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4029-4046.
    19. Sahu, Prasanta K. & Qureshi, Danish & Pani, Agnivesh, 2022. "Examining commercial vehicle fleet ownership decisions and the mediating role of freight generation: A structural equation modeling assessment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 26-33.
    20. Wang, Jinggai & Zhong, Meisu & Wang, Tianni & Ge, Ying-En, 2023. "Identifying industry-related opinions on shore power from a survey in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 65-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:149:y:2024:i:c:p:36-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.