IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i18p6734-d1244414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Combustion Cavern Geometry in Underground Coal Gasification Process with the Use of Borehole Ground-Penetrating Radar

Author

Listed:
  • Zenon Pilecki

    (Mineral and Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Wybickiego 7A, 31-261 Cracow, Poland)

  • Robert Hildebrandt

    (Central Mining Institute, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Krawiec

    (Mineral and Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Wybickiego 7A, 31-261 Cracow, Poland)

  • Elżbieta Pilecka

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)

  • Zbigniew Lubosik

    (Central Mining Institute, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Tomasz Łątka

    (Faculty of Geology, University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

In this study, the shape and size of a combustion cavity with a fracture zone in the gasified coal seam was determined with the use of control boreholes and a ground-penetrating radar (BGPR) test. The underground coal gasification (UCG) field-scale experiment was performed in Carboniferous strata in coal seam 501 at a depth of approx. 460 m in the Wieczorek hard coal mine in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Poland. After the termination of the UCG reactor, five coring boreholes were drilled to identify the geometry of the resulting combustion cavity and the impact of the UCG process on the surrounding rock mass. Borehole ground-penetrating radar measurements were performed using a 100 MHz antenna in three boreholes with a length of about 40–50 m. This enabled the identification of the boundaries of the combustion cavity and the fracture zone in the coal seam. The fracture zones of rock layers and lithological borders near the control borehole were also depicted. As a result, the cavity was estimated to have a length of around 32 m, a width of around 7 m and a height of around 5 m. The analyses performed with the control boreholes and the BGPR provided sufficient information to determine the geometry of the combustion cavity and the fracture zone.

Suggested Citation

  • Zenon Pilecki & Robert Hildebrandt & Krzysztof Krawiec & Elżbieta Pilecka & Zbigniew Lubosik & Tomasz Łątka, 2023. "Assessment of Combustion Cavern Geometry in Underground Coal Gasification Process with the Use of Borehole Ground-Penetrating Radar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6734-:d:1244414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6734/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6734/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Faqiang Su & Takuya Nakanowataru & Ken-ichi Itakura & Koutarou Ohga & Gota Deguchi, 2013. "Evaluation of Structural Changes in the Coal Specimen Heating Process and UCG Model Experiments for Developing Efficient UCG Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Md M. Khan & Joseph P. Mmbaga & Ahad S. Shirazi & Japan Trivedi & Qingzia Liu & Rajender Gupta, 2015. "Modelling Underground Coal Gasification—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-66, November.
    3. Su, Fa-qiang & Itakura, Ken-ichi & Deguchi, Gota & Ohga, Koutarou, 2017. "Monitoring of coal fracturing in underground coal gasification by acoustic emission techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 142-156.
    4. Yuteng Xiao & Jihang Yin & Yifan Hu & Junzhe Wang & Hongsheng Yin & Honggang Qi, 2019. "Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification: Current Research Status and Future Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Su, Fa-qiang & Wu, Jun-bo & Tao-Zhang, & Deng, Qi-chao & Yu, Yi-he & Hamanaka, Akihiro & Dai, Meng-Jia & Yang, Jun-Nan & He, Xiao-long, 2023. "Study on the monitoring method of cavity growth in underground coal gasification under laboratory conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fa-qiang Su & Akihiro Hamanaka & Ken-ichi Itakura & Gota Deguchi & Wenyan Zhang & Hua Nan, 2018. "Evaluation of a Compact Coaxial Underground Coal Gasification System Inside an Artificial Coal Seam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Xi Lin & Qingya Liu & Zhenyu Liu, 2018. "Estimation of Effective Diffusion Coefficient of O 2 in Ash Layer in Underground Coal Gasification by Thermogravimetric Apparatus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Su, Fa-qiang & He, Xiao-long & Dai, Meng-jia & Yang, Jun-nan & Hamanaka, Akihiro & Yu, Yi-he & Li, Wen & Li, Jiao-yuan, 2023. "Estimation of the cavity volume in the gasification zone for underground coal gasification under different oxygen flow conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    4. Yuteng Xiao & Jihang Yin & Yifan Hu & Junzhe Wang & Hongsheng Yin & Honggang Qi, 2019. "Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification: Current Research Status and Future Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Su, Fa-qiang & Hamanaka, Akihiro & Itakura, Ken-ichi & Zhang, Wenyan & Deguchi, Gota & Sato, Kohki & Takahashi, Kazuhiro & Kodama, Jun-ichi, 2018. "Monitoring and evaluation of simulated underground coal gasification in an ex-situ experimental artificial coal seam system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 82-92.
    6. Hao Chen & Yong Qin & Yanpeng Chen & Zhen Dong & Junjie Xue & Shanshan Chen & Mengyuan Zhang & Yufeng Zhao, 2023. "Quantitative Evaluation of Underground Coal Gasification Based on a CO 2 Gasification Agent," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-10, October.
    7. Stefan Zelenak & Erika Skvarekova & Andrea Senova & Gabriel Wittenberger, 2021. "The Usage of UCG Technology as Alternative to Reach Low-Carbon Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2015. "Thermo-Mechanical Simulations of Rock Behavior in Underground Coal Gasification Show Negligible Impact of Temperature-Dependent Parameters on Permeability Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, June.
    9. Wilhelm Jan Tic & Joanna Guziałowska-Tic, 2019. "The Effect of Modifiers and Method of Application on Fine-Coal Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2017. "Prediction of Steam Jacket Dynamics and Water Balances in Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Tomasz Janoszek & Wojciech Masny, 2021. "CFD Simulations of Allothermal Steam Gasification Process for Hydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Mohammadreza Shahbazi & Mehdi Najafi & Mohammad Fatehi Marji, 2019. "On the mitigating environmental aspects of a vertical well in underground coal gasification method," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 373-398, March.
    13. Wang, Xiaorui & Zhang, Qinghe & Yuan, Liang, 2024. "A coupled thermal-force-chemical-displacement multi-field model for underground coal gasification based on controlled retraction injection point technology and its thermal analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    14. Galina Nyashina & Pavel Strizhak, 2018. "Impact of Forest Fuels on Gas Emissions in Coal Slurry Fuel Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Su, Fa-qiang & Wu, Jun-bo & Tao-Zhang, & Deng, Qi-chao & Yu, Yi-he & Hamanaka, Akihiro & Dai, Meng-Jia & Yang, Jun-Nan & He, Xiao-long, 2023. "Study on the monitoring method of cavity growth in underground coal gasification under laboratory conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    16. Krzysztof Skrzypkowski & Krzysztof Zagórski & Anna Zagórska, 2021. "Determination of the Extent of the Rock Destruction Zones around a Gasification Channel on the Basis of Strength Tests of Sandstone and Claystone Samples Heated at High Temperatures up to 1200 °C and ," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Akihiro Hamanaka & Fa-qiang Su & Ken-ichi Itakura & Kazuhiro Takahashi & Jun-ichi Kodama & Gota Deguchi, 2017. "Effect of Injection Flow Rate on Product Gas Quality in Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Based on Laboratory Scale Experiment: Development of Co-Axial UCG System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, February.
    18. Marek Laciak & Milan Durdán & Ján Kačur & Patrik Flegner, 2023. "The Underground Coal Gasification Process in Laboratory Conditions: An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Yanpeng Chen & Tianduoyi Wang & Jinhua Zhang & Mengyuan Zhang & Junjie Xue & Juntai Shi & Yongshang Kang & Shengjie Li, 2022. "Simulation of Water Influx and Gasified Gas Transport during Underground Coal Gasification with Controlled Retracting Injection Point Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-29, May.
    20. Jacek Nowak & Magdalena Kokowska-Pawłowska & Joanna Komorek & Marian Wiatowski & Krzysztof Kapusta & Zdzisław Adamczyk, 2022. "Optical Properties of Coal after Ex-Situ Experimental Simulation of Underground Gasification at Pressures of 10 and 40 bar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6734-:d:1244414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.