IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i18p6589-d1238886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Criteria Approach to Evaluate Sustainability: A Case Study of the Navarrese Wine Sector

Author

Listed:
  • María Dolores Mainar-Toledo

    (Fundación CIRCE, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Avda. Ranillas 3D, 1ª Planta, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Maider Gómez Palmero

    (Fundación CIRCE, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Avda. Ranillas 3D, 1ª Planta, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Maryori Díaz-Ramírez

    (Fundación CIRCE, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Avda. Ranillas 3D, 1ª Planta, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
    Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Instituto Universitario de Investigación Mixto CIRCE—(Universidad de Zaragoza), Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Avda. Ranillas 3D, 1ª Planta, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Iñaki Mendioroz

    (Unión de Agricultores y Ganaderos de Navarra, Avenida de Zaragoza 21 1º dcha, 31003 Pamplona, Spain)

  • David Zambrana-Vasquez

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Instituto Universitario de Investigación Mixto CIRCE—(Universidad de Zaragoza), Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Avda. Ranillas 3D, 1ª Planta, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

The present work introduces a multi-criteria approach focused on the evaluation of wine production, considering the three dimensions of sustainability: environmental, economic and social. In this sense, the most relevant key performance indicators were selected within each dimension and disaggregated into sub-indicators to address the different sustainability aspects within the wine value chain. Furthermore, the analytic hierarchy process was applied as the method to weight the relevance of the three dimensions and corresponding key performance indicators, in order to allow the producers to understand which aspects need to be covered to improve their production sustainability. Results demonstrate how the approach proposed is able to identify, for both the vineyard and winery, the strengths and weaknesses regarding the sustainability performance of their production. Additionally, this study also contributes by shedding light on the most suitable and recommended actions to increase the company’s sustainability from a sustainable perspective. Additionally, it is important to highlight that, although the developed approach is specifically designed for the wine sector in the Navarrese region, it can be replicated by adjusting the key performance indicator selection to apply this methodology to the reality in other wine production regions.

Suggested Citation

  • María Dolores Mainar-Toledo & Maider Gómez Palmero & Maryori Díaz-Ramírez & Iñaki Mendioroz & David Zambrana-Vasquez, 2023. "A Multi-Criteria Approach to Evaluate Sustainability: A Case Study of the Navarrese Wine Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6589-:d:1238886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6589/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6589/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guilherme Pontes Luz & Rodrigo Amaro e Silva, 2021. "Modeling Energy Communities with Collective Photovoltaic Self-Consumption: Synergies between a Small City and a Winery in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Daniel Gómez-Lorente & Ovidio Rabaza & Fernando Aznar-Dols & María José Mercado-Vargas, 2017. "Economic and Environmental Study of Wineries Powered by Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems in Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Olimpia Martucci & Gabriella Arcese & Chiara Montauti & Alessia Acampora, 2019. "Social Aspects in the Wine Sector: Comparison between Social Life Cycle Assessment and VIVA Sustainable Wine Project Indicators," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, April.
    4. María Blecua-de-Pedro & Maryori C. Díaz-Ramírez, 2021. "Assessment of Potential Barriers to the Implementation of an Innovative AB-FB Energy Storage System under a Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Pamela Jeziorska-Biel & Katarzyna Leśniewska-Napierała & Konrad Czapiewski, 2021. "(Circular) Path Dependence—The Role of Vineyards in Land Use, Society and Regional Development—The Case of Lubuskie Region (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Escobar, M. T. & Aguaron, J. & Moreno-Jimenez, J. M., 2004. "A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 318-322, March.
    7. Mariana Ferdeș & Bianca Ștefania Zăbavă & Gigel Paraschiv & Mariana Ionescu & Mirela Nicoleta Dincă & Georgiana Moiceanu, 2022. "Food Waste Management for Biogas Production in the Context of Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.
    8. Francesco Nocera & Rosa Caponetto & Giada Giuffrida & Maurizio Detommaso, 2020. "Energetic Retrofit Strategies for Traditional Sicilian Wine Cellars: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Pivetta & Sergio Rech & Andrea Lazzaretto, 2020. "Choice of the Optimal Design and Operation of Multi-Energy Conversion Systems in a Prosecco Wine Cellar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-33, November.
    2. Mariana Senkiv & Jörn Schultheiß & Maximilian Tafel & Martin Reiss & Eckhard Jedicke, 2022. "Are Winegrowers Tourism Promoters?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Catrini, P. & Panno, D. & Cardona, F. & Piacentino, A., 2020. "Characterization of cooling loads in the wine industry and novel seasonal indicator for reliable assessment of energy saving through retrofit of chillers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Van Asch, Thomas & Dewulf, Wouter & Kupfer, Franziska & Cárdenas, Ivan & Van de Voorde, Eddy, 2020. "Cross-border e-commerce logistics – Strategic success factors for airports," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. M Tavana & M A Sodenkamp, 2010. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis model for advanced technology assessment at Kennedy Space Center," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(10), pages 1459-1470, October.
    6. Rabelo, Luis & Eskandari, Hamidreza & Shaalan, Tarek & Helal, Magdy, 2007. "Value chain analysis using hybrid simulation and AHP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 536-547, February.
    7. Carmine Cancro & Camelia Delcea & Salvatore Fabozzi & Gabriella Ferruzzi & Giorgio Graditi & Valeria Palladino & Maria Valenti, 2022. "A Profitability Analysis for an Aggregator in the Ancillary Services Market: An Italian Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    8. Francesca Ceglia & Elisa Marrasso & Chiara Martone & Giovanna Pallotta & Carlo Roselli & Maurizio Sasso, 2023. "Towards the Decarbonization of Industrial Districts through Renewable Energy Communities: Techno-Economic Feasibility of an Italian Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Alexey Maslakov & Ksenia Sotnikova & Gleb Gribovskii & Dmitry Evlanov, 2022. "Thermal Simulation of Ice Cellars as a Basis for Food Security and Energy Sustainability of Isolated Indigenous Communities in the Arctic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Toly Chen, 2021. "A diversified AHP-tree approach for multiple-criteria supplier selection," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 431-453, October.
    11. Giada Giuffrida & Rosa Caponetto & Francesco Nocera & Massimo Cuomo, 2021. "Prototyping of a Novel Rammed Earth Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    12. S. Lipovetsky, 2009. "Global Priority Estimation in Multiperson Decision Making," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 77-91, January.
    13. Janota, Lukáš & Vávrová, Kamila & Weger, Jan & Knápek, Jaroslav & Králík, Tomáš, 2023. "Complex methodology for optimizing local energy supply and overall resilience of rural areas: A case study of Agrovoltaic system with Miscanthus x giganteus plantation within the energy community in t," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 738-750.
    14. María Dolores Mainar-Toledo & Maryori Díaz-Ramírez & Snorri J. Egilsson & Claudio Zuffi & Giampaolo Manfrida & Héctor Leiva, 2023. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Nesjavellir Geothermal Power Plant for Heat and Electricity Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Francesca Ceglia & Elisa Marrasso & Samiran Samanta & Maurizio Sasso, 2022. "Addressing Energy Poverty in the Energy Community: Assessment of Energy, Environmental, Economic, and Social Benefits for an Italian Residential Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Lai, Po‐Lin & Potter, Andrew & Beynon, Malcolm & Beresford, Anthony, 2015. "Evaluating the efficiency performance of airports using an integrated AHP/DEA-AR technique," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 75-85.
    17. Gabriele C. Eder & Yuliya Voronko & Christina Hirschl & Rita Ebner & Gusztáv Újvári & Wolfgang Mühleisen, 2018. "Non-Destructive Failure Detection and Visualization of Artificially and Naturally Aged PV Modules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, April.
    18. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui & Zhang, Ren & Hong, Mei, 2015. "Generalized analytic network process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 277-288.
    19. Claudio Alimonti & Gabriele Pecci, 2021. "Back Analysis of a Horizontal Geothermal Plant Implemented in a Wine Production Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Germán Álvarez-López & Alejandra María Múnera & Juan G. Villegas, 2023. "Multicriteria Decision-Making Tools for the Selection of Biomasses as Supplementary Cementitious Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6589-:d:1238886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.