IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i17p6157-d1224085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Analysis of Marine-Predator-Algorithm-Based Optimum PI Controller with Unified Power Flow Controller for Loss Reduction in Wind–Solar Integrated System

Author

Listed:
  • Chandu Valuva

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur 603203, India)

  • Subramani Chinnamuthu

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur 603203, India)

Abstract

Transmission line losses are a crucial and essential issue in stable power system operation. Numerous methodologies and techniques prevail for minimizing losses. Subsequently, Flexible Alternating Current Transmission Systems (FACTSs) efficiently reduce transmission losses, and the Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) is a reactive power compensation controller. The parameter strength of the proportional–integral (PI) controller was calibrated with the Marine Predator Algorithm (MPA), a recent metaheuristic algorithm. An MPA-based optimum PI controller with a UPFC evaluates the optimal location of the UPFC and PI controller parameters to accomplish the desired research objective. The power rating of the UPFC was determined depending on the voltage collapse rating and power loss and an evaluated performance analysis of the MPA–PI-controlled UPFC on a modified IEEE-30 bus transmission network in MATLAB Simulink code. The Newton–Raphson method was used to perform the load flow analysis. Hence, the proposed MPA–PI controller was examined in contrast to preferred heuristic algorithms, the Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) and Moth Flame Optimization algorithms (MFO); the results showed that the MPA–PI controller exhibited better performance with an improved voltage profile and surpasses active power losses with the optimal placement of the UPFC device under different loading conditions. The active power loss, considering a UPFC with the proposed algorithm, reduced from 0.0622 p.u to 0.0301 p.u; consequently, the voltage profile was improved in the respective buses, and the loss percentage reduction during a 100% base load was 68.39%, which was comparatively better than the ABC and MFO algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Chandu Valuva & Subramani Chinnamuthu, 2023. "Performance Analysis of Marine-Predator-Algorithm-Based Optimum PI Controller with Unified Power Flow Controller for Loss Reduction in Wind–Solar Integrated System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:17:p:6157-:d:1224085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/17/6157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/17/6157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reddy, S. Surender, 2017. "Optimal scheduling of thermal-wind-solar power system with storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1357-1368.
    2. Martin Ćalasan & Tatjana Konjić & Katarina Kecojević & Lazar Nikitović, 2020. "Optimal Allocation of Static Var Compensators in Electric Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Sharif, Arshian & Raza, Syed Ali & Ozturk, Ilhan & Afshan, Sahar, 2019. "The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: A global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 685-691.
    4. Hemmati, Reza & Ghiasi, Seyyed Mohammad Sadegh & Entezariharsini, Azam, 2018. "Power fluctuation smoothing and loss reduction in grid integrated with thermal-wind-solar-storage units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 759-769.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed, R. & Sreeram, V. & Mishra, Y. & Arif, M.D., 2020. "A review and evaluation of the state-of-the-art in PV solar power forecasting: Techniques and optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Łukasz Nazarko & Eigirdas Žemaitis & Łukasz Krzysztof Wróblewski & Karel Šuhajda & Magdalena Zajączkowska, 2022. "The Impact of Energy Development of the European Union Euro Area Countries on CO 2 Emissions Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Aruna Kanagaraj & Kumudini Devi Raguru Pandu, 2020. "Investigations of Various Market Models in a Deregulated Power Environment Using ACOPF," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Sakthivel, V.P. & Thirumal, K. & Sathya, P.D., 2022. "Short term scheduling of hydrothermal power systems with photovoltaic and pumped storage plants using quasi-oppositional turbulent water flow optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 459-492.
    5. Monteiro, Raul V.A. & Guimarães, Geraldo C. & Silva, Fernando Bento & da Silva Teixeira, Raoni F. & Carvalho, Bismarck C. & Finazzi, Antônio de P. & de Vasconcellos, Arnulfo B., 2018. "A medium-term analysis of the reduction in technical losses on distribution systems with variable demand using artificial neural networks: An Electrical Energy Storage approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1216-1228.
    6. Peng, Benhong & Zhao, Yinyin & Elahi, Ehsan & Wan, Anxia, 2023. "Can third-party market cooperation solve the dilemma of emissions reduction? A case study of energy investment project conflict analysis in the context of carbon neutrality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    7. Shiyu Wu & Xinyi Li & Xiaosen Du & Zexin Li, 2022. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Karaaslan, Abdulkerim & Çamkaya, Serhat, 2022. "The relationship between CO2 emissions, economic growth, health expenditure, and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption: Empirical evidence from Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 457-466.
    9. Sultan Salem & Noman Arshed & Ahsan Anwar & Mubasher Iqbal & Nyla Sattar, 2021. "Renewable Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions—Testing Nonlinearity for Highly Carbon Emitting Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Aslam, Naveed & Yang, Wanping & Saeed, Rabia, 2024. "Environmental regulations or environmental-related technology to overcome energy security risk? Empirical analysis for top manufacturing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    11. Yunzhao, Lu, 2022. "Modelling the role of eco innovation, renewable energy, and environmental taxes in carbon emissions reduction in E−7 economies: Evidence from advance panel estimations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 309-318.
    12. Lei, Xiying & Alharthi, Majed & Ahmad, Ishtiaq & Aziz, Babar & Abdin, Zain ul, 2022. "Importance of international relations for the promotion of renewable energy, preservation of natural resources and environment: Empirics from SEA nations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1250-1257.
    13. Pata, Ugur Korkut & Kartal, Mustafa Tevfik & Erdogan, Sinan & Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu, 2023. "The role of renewable and nuclear energy R&D expenditures and income on environmental quality in Germany: Scrutinizing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with smooth structural changes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    14. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Nwani, Chinazaekpere & Bekun, Festus Victor & Gyamfi, Bright Akwasi & Agozie, Divine Q., 2022. "Discerning the role of renewable energy and energy efficiency in finding the path to cleaner consumption and production patterns: New insights from developing economies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    15. Johnathon, Chris & Agalgaonkar, Ashish Prakash & Planiden, Chayne & Kennedy, Joel, 2023. "A proposed hedge-based energy market model to manage renewable intermittency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 376-384.
    16. Anubhav Kumar Pandey & Vinay Kumar Jadoun & Jayalakshmi N. Sabhahit, 2022. "Real-Time Peak Valley Pricing Based Multi-Objective Optimal Scheduling of a Virtual Power Plant Considering Renewable Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-30, August.
    17. Cheng Jin & Asif Razzaq & Faiza Saleem & Avik Sinha, 2022. "Asymmetric effects of eco-innovation and human capital development in realizing environmental sustainability in China: evidence from quantile ARDL framework," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 4947-4970, December.
    18. Ghareeb Moustafa & Mostafa Elshahed & Ahmed R. Ginidi & Abdullah M. Shaheen & Hany S. E. Mansour, 2023. "A Gradient-Based Optimizer with a Crossover Operator for Distribution Static VAR Compensator (D-SVC) Sizing and Placement in Electrical Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-30, February.
    19. Moises Neil V Seriño, 2022. "Energy security through diversification of non-hydro renewable energy sources in developing countries," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(3), pages 546-561, May.
    20. Ramzan, Muhammad & Abbasi, Kashif Raza & Iqbal, Hafiz Arslan & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday, 2023. "What's at Stake? The empirical importance of government revenue and debt and renewable energy for environmental neutrality in the US economy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 475-489.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:17:p:6157-:d:1224085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.