IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i11p4498-d1162723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon-Neutral Steel Production and Its Impact on the Economies of China, Japan, and Korea: A Simulation with E3ME-FTT:Steel

Author

Listed:
  • Pim Vercoulen

    (Cambridge Econometrics, Covent Garden, Cambridge CB1 2HT, UK
    Global Systems Institute, Department of Geography, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK)

  • Soocheol Lee

    (Faculty of Economics, Meijo University, Nagoya 468-0073, Japan)

  • Xu Han

    (Cambridge Econometrics, Covent Garden, Cambridge CB1 2HT, UK
    Graduate School of Economics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan)

  • Wendan Zhang

    (School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

  • Yongsung Cho

    (Department of Food and Resource Economics, Korea University, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Jun Pang

    (School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

Abstract

The iron and steel industry is a large emitter of CO 2 globally. This is especially true for the iron and steel industries in China, Japan, and Korea due to their production volumes and the prevalence of carbon-based steel production. With few low-carbon and commercially available alternatives, the iron and steel industry is truly a hard-to-abate sector. Each of the countries of interest have committed to a net-zero future involving the mitigation of emissions from steel production. However, few studies have investigated the means by which to achieve decarbonization beyond the inclusion of price signalling policies (e.g., carbon tax or emission trading schemes). Here, we use E3ME-FTT:Steel to simulate technology diffusion in the ISI under several policy environments and we investigate the likely impacts on the wider economy. The results show that penalizing carbon intensive processes can incentivize a transition towards scrap recycling, but it is relatively unsuccessful in aiding the uptake of low carbon primary steelmaking. A combination of support and penalizing policies can achieve deep decarbonisation (>80% emission reduction compared with the baseline). Mitigating the emissions in the iron and steel industry can lead to economic benefits in terms of GDP (China: +0.8%; Japan: +1.3%; Korea: +0.1%), and employment (Japan: +0.7%; Korea: +0.3%) with China, where job losses in the coal sector would negate job gains elsewhere, as the exception.

Suggested Citation

  • Pim Vercoulen & Soocheol Lee & Xu Han & Wendan Zhang & Yongsung Cho & Jun Pang, 2023. "Carbon-Neutral Steel Production and Its Impact on the Economies of China, Japan, and Korea: A Simulation with E3ME-FTT:Steel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4498-:d:1162723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4498/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4498/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J-F Mercure & H. Pollitt & N. R. Edwards & P. B. Holden & U. Chewpreecha & P. Salas & A. Lam & F. Knobloch & J. Vinuales, 2017. "Environmental impact assessment for climate change policy with the simulation-based integrated assessment model E3ME-FTT-GENIE," Papers 1707.04870, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2018.
    2. David M. Reiner, 2016. "Learning through a portfolio of carbon capture and storage demonstration projects," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(1), pages 1-7, January.
    3. Jean-François Mercure, 2015. "An age structured demographic theory of technological change," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 787-820, September.
    4. Mercure, Jean-François, 2012. "FTT:Power : A global model of the power sector with induced technological change and natural resource depletion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 799-811.
    5. Peng Wang & Morten Ryberg & Yi Yang & Kuishuang Feng & Sami Kara & Michael Hauschild & Wei-Qiang Chen, 2021. "Efficiency stagnation in global steel production urges joint supply- and demand-side mitigation efforts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Allwood, Julian M. & Ashby, Michael F. & Gutowski, Timothy G. & Worrell, Ernst, 2011. "Material efficiency: A white paper," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 362-381.
    7. Frank M. Bass, 1969. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 215-227, January.
    8. Hector Pollitt & Jean-Francois Mercure, 2018. "The role of money and the financial sector in energy-economy models used for assessing climate and energy policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 184-197, February.
    9. Dolf Gielen & Deger Saygin & Emanuele Taibi & Jean‐Pierre Birat, 2020. "Renewables‐based decarbonization and relocation of iron and steel making: A case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1113-1125, October.
    10. Adrian Odenweller & Falko Ueckerdt & Gregory F. Nemet & Miha Jensterle & Gunnar Luderer, 2022. "Probabilistic feasibility space of scaling up green hydrogen supply," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(9), pages 854-865, September.
    11. Ren, Lei & Zhou, Sheng & Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin, 2021. "A review of CO2 emissions reduction technologies and low-carbon development in the iron and steel industry focusing on China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    12. Soocheol Lee & Yanmin He & Sunhee Suk & Toru Morotomi & Unnada Chewpreecha, 2022. "Impact on the power mix and economy of Japan under a 2050 carbon-neutral scenario: Analysis using the E3ME macro-econometric model," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7), pages 823-833, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hartvig, Áron Dénes & Kiss-Dobronyi, Bence & Kotek, Péter & Takácsné Tóth, Borbála & Gutzianas, Ioannis & Zareczky, András Zsombor, 2024. "The economic and energy security implications of the Russian energy weapon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    2. Femke J. M. M. Nijsse & Jean-Francois Mercure & Nadia Ameli & Francesca Larosa & Sumit Kothari & Jamie Rickman & Pim Vercoulen & Hector Pollitt, 2023. "The momentum of the solar energy transition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Josué Rodríguez Diez & Silvia Tomé-Torquemada & Asier Vicente & Jon Reyes & G. Alonso Orcajo, 2023. "Decarbonization Pathways, Strategies, and Use Cases to Achieve Net-Zero CO 2 Emissions in the Steelmaking Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-31, October.
    4. Andrade, Carlos & Desport, Lucas & Selosse, Sandrine, 2024. "Net-negative emission opportunities for the iron and steel industry on a global scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    5. Cheng, Shulei & Wang, Kexin & Meng, Fanxin & Liu, Gengyuan & An, Jiafu, 2024. "The unanticipated role of fiscal environmental expenditure in accelerating household carbon emissions: Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    6. Anibal Coronel & Esperanza Lozada & Stefan Berres & Fernando Huancas & Nicolás Murúa, 2024. "Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Approximation of Heat Conduction in Three-Phase-Lag Solid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mercure, Jean-François, 2018. "Fashion, fads and the popularity of choices: Micro-foundations for diffusion consumer theory," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 194-207.
    2. J. -F. Mercure & H. Pollitt & A. M. Bassi & J. E Vi~nuales & N. R. Edwards, 2015. "Modelling complex systems of heterogeneous agents to better design sustainability transitions policy," Papers 1506.07432, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2016.
    3. Hu, Xiurong & Pollitt, Hector & Pirie, Jamie & Mercure, Jean-Francois & Liu, Junfeng & Meng, Jing & Tao, Shu, 2020. "The impacts of the trade liberalization of environmental goods on power system and CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Mercure, Jean-François & Salas, Pablo, 2013. "On the global economic potentials and marginal costs of non-renewable resources and the price of energy commodities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 469-483.
    5. Knobloch, Florian & Pollitt, Hector & Chewpreecha, Unnada & Lewney, Richard & Huijbregts, Mark A.J. & Mercure, Jean-Francois, 2021. "FTT:Heat — A simulation model for technological change in the European residential heating sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Hafner, Sarah & Anger-Kraavi, Annela & Monasterolo, Irene & Jones, Aled, 2020. "Emergence of New Economics Energy Transition Models: A Review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    7. Florian Knobloch & Hector Pollitt & Unnada Chewpreecha & Vassilis Daioglou & Jean-Francois Mercure, 2017. "Simulating the deep decarbonisation of residential heating for limiting global warming to 1.5C," Papers 1710.11019, arXiv.org, revised May 2018.
    8. Yuancheng Lin & Honghua Yang & Linwei Ma & Zheng Li & Weidou Ni, 2021. "Low-Carbon Development for the Iron and Steel Industry in China and the World: Status Quo, Future Vision, and Key Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-28, November.
    9. Christopher J. Blackburn & Mallory E. Flowers & Daniel C. Matisoff & Juan Moreno‐Cruz, 2020. "Do Pilot and Demonstration Projects Work? Evidence from a Green Building Program," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1100-1132, September.
    10. Mercure, J.-F. & Pollitt, H. & Chewpreecha, U. & Salas, P. & Foley, A.M. & Holden, P.B. & Edwards, N.R., 2014. "The dynamics of technology diffusion and the impacts of climate policy instruments in the decarbonisation of the global electricity sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 686-700.
    11. F. Knobloch & J. -F. Mercure, 2016. "The behavioural aspect of green technology investments: a general positive model in the context of heterogeneous agents," Papers 1603.06888, arXiv.org.
    12. Siavashi, Majid & Hosseini, Farzad & Talesh Bahrami, Hamid Reza, 2021. "A new design with preheating and layered porous ceramic for hydrogen production through methane steam reforming process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    13. Femke J. M. M. Nijsse & Jean-Francois Mercure & Nadia Ameli & Francesca Larosa & Sumit Kothari & Jamie Rickman & Pim Vercoulen & Hector Pollitt, 2023. "The momentum of the solar energy transition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Liu, Dachuan & Wang, Pu & Sun, Yan & Zhang, Huawei & Xu, Shanqing, 2024. "Co-abatement of carbon and air pollutants emissions in China’s iron and steel industry under carbon neutrality scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Nieto, Jaime & Pollitt, Hector & Brockway, Paul E. & Clements, Lucy & Sakai, Marco & Barrett, John, 2021. "Socio-macroeconomic impacts of implementing different post-Brexit UK energy reduction targets to 2030," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Hector Pollitt & Karsten Neuhoff & Xinru Lin, 2020. "The impact of implementing a consumption charge on carbon-intensive materials in Europe," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(S1), pages 74-89, April.
    17. J.-F. Mercure & A. Lam & S. Billington & H. Pollitt, 2018. "Integrated assessment modelling as a positive science: private passenger road transport policies to meet a climate target well below 2 ∘C," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 109-129, November.
    18. Hartvig, Áron Dénes & Kiss-Dobronyi, Bence & Kotek, Péter & Takácsné Tóth, Borbála & Gutzianas, Ioannis & Zareczky, András Zsombor, 2024. "The economic and energy security implications of the Russian energy weapon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    19. Soocheol Lee & Unnada Chewpreecha & Hector Pollitt & Satoshi Kojima, 2018. "An economic assessment of carbon tax reform to meet Japan’s NDC target under different nuclear assumptions using the E3ME model," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 20(2), pages 411-429, April.
    20. Floor Brouwer & Lydia Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia & Eva Alexandri & Ingrida Bremere & Matthew Griffey & Vincent Linderhof, 2018. "The Nexus Concept Integrating Energy and Resource Efficiency for Policy Assessments: A Comparative Approach from Three Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4498-:d:1162723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.