IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i14p5239-d866510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Conditions of Using Biodegradable Waste for Biogas Production, Using the Example of Poland and Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Sobczak

    (Faculty of Economics, The Jacob of Paradies University in Gorzów Wielkopolski, 66-400 Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland)

  • Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka

    (Faculty of Economics, The Jacob of Paradies University in Gorzów Wielkopolski, 66-400 Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland)

  • Andrzej Kokiel

    (Faculty of Economics, The WSB University in Poznan, 61-895 Poznan, Poland)

  • Monika Różycka

    (Faculty of Economics, Finance and Management, University of Szczecin, 70-453 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Jacek Stasiak

    (Non-Public Health Care Centre Interschool Department of Rehabilitation and Correction Science and Research Center, 95-070 Aleksandrów Łódzki, Poland)

  • Dariusz Soboń

    (Faculty of Economics, The Jacob of Paradies University in Gorzów Wielkopolski, 66-400 Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland)

Abstract

Biogas production is a process with great potential. It uses the biodegradable raw materials of animal, vegetable and municipal waste. The amount of municipal as well as agricultural waste is increasing every year. This waste is an unmanaged and nuisance waste, and using it in biogas plants reduces the amount of waste. Biogas production is part of the EU’s policy to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and use energy from renewable sources (diversification of energy sources). Its importance is certain to increase in the future as energy demand increases. This article deals with the economical use of biodegradable waste for biogas production in Poland and Germany. Both countries have a similar agricultural and municipal waste structure. An agricultural biogas plant is one way of obtaining energy based on renewable energy sources (RES). Energy production from agricultural biogas will allow Poland to meet the 32% obligation imposed by the EU and Germany to continue to be the market leader in biogas plants. The biogas market in Poland is growing, while in Germany, there is a decline in biogas installations. The article indicates what changes need to take place in agriculture and the use of municipal waste in these countries to sustain the development of biogas plants. Both countries should maintain animal husbandry to ensure continuous access to substrate and use waste for production rather than growing maize or other mixtures only for biogas plants. Due to the high price of chemical fertilisers, pulp from biogas plants should be an alternative to chemical fertilisers in both countries, which will contribute to greener crops. The governments of both countries should support such measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Sobczak & Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Monika Różycka & Jacek Stasiak & Dariusz Soboń, 2022. "Economic Conditions of Using Biodegradable Waste for Biogas Production, Using the Example of Poland and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5239-:d:866510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marlena Piekut, 2021. "The Consumption of Renewable Energy Sources (RES) by the European Union Households between 2004 and 2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Kilian, Stefan & Anton, Jesus & Roder, Norbert & Salhofer, Klaus, 2008. "Impacts Of 2003 Cap Reform On Land Prices: From Theory To Empirical Results," 109th Seminar, November 20-21, 2008, Viterbo, Italy 44808, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Andreas Eder & Bernhard Mahlberg, 2018. "Size, Subsidies and Technical Efficiency in Renewable Energy Production: The Case of Austrian Biogas Plants," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    4. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń, 2022. "Wind Energy Market in Poland in the Background of the Baltic Sea Bordering Countries in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Vergara, Felipe & Lakes, Tobia Maike, 2019. "Maizification of the landscape for biogas production? Identifying the likelihood of silage maize for biogas in Brandenburg from 2008-2018," FORLand Working Papers 16 (2019), Humboldt University Berlin, DFG Research Unit 2569 FORLand "Agricultural Land Markets – Efficiency and Regulation".
    6. Habermann, Hendrik & Breustedt, Gunnar, 2011. "Einfluss der Biogaserzeugung auf landwirtschaftliche Pachtpreise in Deutschland," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 60(2).
    7. Appel, Franziska & Ostermeyer-Wiethaup, Arlette & Balmann, Alfons, 2016. "Effects of the German Renewable Energy Act on structural change in agriculture – The case of biogas," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 172-182.
    8. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń, 2022. "The Potential and Development of the Geothermal Energy Market in Poland and the Baltic States—Selected Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Arkadiusz Piwowar & Maria Dzikuć, 2022. "Bioethanol Production in Poland in the Context of Sustainable Development-Current Status and Future Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Ellen Goddard & Alfons Weersink & Kevin Chen & Calum G. Turvey, 1993. "Economics of Structural Change in Agriculture," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 41(4), pages 475-489, December.
    11. Oussama Laayati & Hicham El Hadraoui & Nasr Guennoui & Mostafa Bouzi & Ahmed Chebak, 2022. "Smart Energy Management System: Design of a Smart Grid Test Bench for Educational Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-31, April.
    12. Habermann, Hendrik & Breustedt, Gunnar, 2011. "Einfluss der Biogaserzeugung auf landwirtschaftliche Pachtpreise in Deutschland," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 60(02), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Muhammad Usman Hanif & Mohammed Zwawi & Mohammed Algarni & Ali Bahadar & Hamid Iqbal & Sergio C. Capareda & Muhammad Adnan Hanif & Adeel Waqas & Nazia Hossain & Muhammad Tahir Hussain Siddiqui & Sabzo, 2022. "The Effects of Using Pretreated Cotton Gin Trash on the Production of Biogas from Anaerobic Co-Digestion with Cow Manure and Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Omid Norouzi & Animesh Dutta, 2022. "The Current Status and Future Potential of Biogas Production from Canada’s Organic Fraction Municipal Solid Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Jakub Mazurkiewicz, 2022. "Energy and Economic Balance between Manure Stored and Used as a Substrate for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń & Jacek Stasiak, 2022. "Analysis and Evaluation of the Photovoltaic Market in Poland and the Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Józef Ciuła & Iwona Wiewiórska & Marian Banaś & Tadeusz Pająk & Piotr Szewczyk, 2023. "Balance and Energy Use of Biogas in Poland: Prospects and Directions of Development for the Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Albiona Pestisha & Zoltán Gabnai & Aidana Chalgynbayeva & Péter Lengyel & Attila Bai, 2023. "On-Farm Renewable Energy Systems: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Nitad Jaisue & Nipon Ketjoy & Malinee Kaewpanha & Prapita Thanarak, 2023. "The Barriers Analysis for Waste-to-Energy Project Development in Thailand: Using an Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Wojciech Czekała & Tomasz Jasiński & Mieczysław Grzelak & Kamil Witaszek & Jacek Dach, 2022. "Biogas Plant Operation: Digestate as the Valuable Product," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-11, November.
    5. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń & Jacek Stasiak, 2022. "Hydropower in the Energy Market in Poland and the Baltic States in the Light of the Challenges of Sustainable Development-An Overview of the Current State and Development Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Xin Zhao & Yanqi Chen & Gang Xu & Heng Chen, 2022. "Economic Assessment of Operation Strategies on Park-Level Integrated Energy System Coupled with Biogas: A Case Study in a Sewage Treatment Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Monika Różycka & Dariusz Soboń & Jacek Stasiak, 2023. "Energy Innovation for Individual Consumers in Poland—Analysis of Potential and Evaluation of Practical Applications in Selected Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Nanang Dwi Wahyono & Niswatin Hasanah & Rita Parmawati & Wing-Keung Wong, 2023. "Improving Economic Welfare through Capital Development: Case Study of Smallholder Dairy Farmers in Pujon District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Derick Lima & Gregory Appleby & Li Li, 2023. "A Scoping Review of Options for Increasing Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge: Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing Energy Self-Sufficiency in Wastewater Treatment Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, March.
    10. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Hubert Gąsiński & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Dariusz Soboń & Sebastian Zupok, 2023. "Review of Selected Aspects of Wind Energy Market Development in Poland and Lithuania in the Face of Current Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Nuno Pereira & José Antunes & Luís Barreto, 2023. "Impact of Management and Reverse Logistics on Recycling in a War Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Yajing He & Shihong Zhang & Dongjing Liu & Xing Xie & Bin Li, 2023. "Effect of Biomass Particle Size on the Torrefaction Characteristics in a Fixed-Bed Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Małgorzata Stec & Mariola Grzebyk, 2022. "Statistical Analysis of the Level of Development of Renewable Energy Sources in the Countries of the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Jakub Mazurkiewicz, 2023. "Loss of Energy and Economic Potential of a Biogas Plant Fed with Cow Manure due to Storage Time," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xueqing Yang & Yang Liu & Mei Wang & Alberto Bezama & Daniela Thrän, 2021. "Identifying the Necessities of Regional-Based Analysis to Study Germany’s Biogas Production Development under Energy Transition," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Heinrich, F. & Appel, F., 2018. "Do investors ruin Germany s peasant agriculture?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277171, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Appel, Franziska & Ostermeyer-Wiethaup, Arlette & Balmann, Alfons, 2016. "Effects of the German Renewable Energy Act on structural change in agriculture – The case of biogas," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 172-182.
    4. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Hubert Gąsiński & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Dariusz Soboń & Sebastian Zupok, 2023. "Review of Selected Aspects of Wind Energy Market Development in Poland and Lithuania in the Face of Current Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Venus, Terese E. & Strauss, Felix & Venus, Thomas J. & Sauer, Johannes, 2021. "Understanding stakeholder preferences for future biogas development in Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Alexander März & Nadja Klein & Thomas Kneib & Oliver Musshoff, 2016. "Analysing farmland rental rates using Bayesian geoadditive quantile regression," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(4), pages 663-698.
    7. Bożena Gajdzik & Magdalena Jaciow & Radosław Wolniak & Robert Wolny & Wieslaw Wes Grebski, 2023. "Energy Behaviors of Prosumers in Example of Polish Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Anna Sobczak & Edward Urbańczyk, 2022. "RES Market Development and Public Awareness of the Economic and Environmental Dimension of the Energy Transformation in Poland and Lithuania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Olena Myrna & Martin Odening & Matthias Ritter, 2019. "The Influence of Wind Energy and Biogas on Farmland Prices," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Cord-Friedrich von Hobe & Marius Michels & Oliver Musshoff, 2021. "German Farmers’ Perspectives on Price Drivers in Agricultural Land Rental Markets—A Combination of a Systematic Literature Review and Survey Results," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Ostermeyer, Arlette & Schonau, Franziska, 2012. "Effects of biogas production on inter- and in-farm competition," 131st Seminar, September 18-19, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic 135772, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Lisa Holden & Tomasz Rokicki, 2022. "The Role of Renewable Energy Sources in Electricity Production in Poland and the Background of Energy Policy of the European Union at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Crisis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Scholz, L. & Meyer-Aurich, A. & Kirschke, D., 2014. "Bestimmungsfaktoren der Silomaisproduktion - Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 49, March.
    14. Schaper, Christian & Emmann, Carsten H. & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2011. "Der Markt für Bioenergie 2011," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 60(Supplemen), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń, 2022. "The Potential and Development of the Geothermal Energy Market in Poland and the Baltic States—Selected Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Guenther-Lübbers, W. & Theuvsen, L., 2015. "Regionalökonomische Effekte der niedersächsischen Biogasproduktion," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 50, March.
    17. Henning Schaak & Oliver Musshoff, 2022. "The distribution of the rent–price relationship of agricultural land in Germany," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(3), pages 696-718.
    18. Emmann, Carsten & Surmann, Dennis & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2015. "Charakterisierung und Bedeutung außerlandwirtschaftlicher Investoren – Empirische Ergebnisse aus Sicht des landwirtschaftlichen Berufsstandes," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260787, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    19. Back, Hans & Lehn , Friederike & Bahrs, Enno, 2018. "Der Einfluss Von Flächenkonzentration Und -Disparität Auf Die Bodenrichtwerte Von Ackerflächen – Thüringen, Rheinland-Pfalz Und Nordrhein-Westfalen Im Vergleich," 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018 275847, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    20. Schaper, Christian & Emmann, Carsten H. & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2010. "Der Markt für Bioenergie 2011," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 60.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5239-:d:866510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.