IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i23p8946-d984965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does the Accessibility of Floating Wind Farm Sites Compare to Existing Fixed Bottom Sites?

Author

Listed:
  • David Rowell

    (Wind and Marine Energy Systems & Structures CDT, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XW, UK)

  • Brian Jenkins

    (Wind and Marine Energy Systems & Structures CDT, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XW, UK)

  • James Carroll

    (Wind and Marine Energy Systems & Structures CDT, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XW, UK)

  • David McMillan

    (Wind and Marine Energy Systems & Structures CDT, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XW, UK)

Abstract

Offshore wind is poised for huge growth in the coming years, the UK government has set targets of 40 GW of offshore wind, including 1 GW of floating wind, to be installed in the UK by 2030. Many proposed wind development sites are in deeper waters, farther from shore and will therefore need to be developed as floating wind sites. Developing sites in deeper waters provides access to higher, more consistent wind speeds, however this also means increased wave heights and tougher operating conditions. This makes the challenge of site accessibility critical to the goal of lowering the costs of offshore wind. Accessibility is the amount of time that vessels can safely access a given site. The objective of this study was to make a comparison of the accessibility of potential future floating wind sites to existing fixed bottom wind farm sites. Accessibility was calculated by developing Matlab code using established techniques and definitions found in the literature. A case study was then completed using sites in Scottish waters proposed for development as part of the Scotwind leasing plan. The majority of the Scotwind sites will need to be developed as floating wind sites due to the large water depths. This study assesses the accessibility of the Scotwind leasing sites and compares them to a typical fixed bottom site. The study found that accessibility will be a greater challenge for floating farm wind sites compared to fixed bottom sites. Increased access to vessels that can operate in larger wave heights will likely be necessary to operate and maintain floating wind farm sites.

Suggested Citation

  • David Rowell & Brian Jenkins & James Carroll & David McMillan, 2022. "How Does the Accessibility of Floating Wind Farm Sites Compare to Existing Fixed Bottom Sites?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:8946-:d:984965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/8946/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/8946/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O'Connor, M. & Lewis, T. & Dalton, G., 2013. "Weather window analysis of Irish west coast wave data with relevance to operations & maintenance of marine renewables," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 57-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Centeno-Telleria, Manu & Yue, Hong & Carrol, James & Penalba, Markel & Aizpurua, Jose I., 2024. "Impact of operations and maintenance on the energy production of floating offshore wind farms across the North Sea and the Iberian Peninsula," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Rowell, David & McMillan, David & Carroll, James, 2024. "Offshore wind H&S: A review and analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    3. Rebecca J. Barthelmie & Gunner C. Larsen & Sara C. Pryor, 2023. "Modeling Annual Electricity Production and Levelized Cost of Energy from the US East Coast Offshore Wind Energy Lease Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-29, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon Ambühl & Laurent Marquis & Jens Peter Kofoed & John Dalsgaard Sørensen, 2015. "Operation and maintenance strategies for wave energy converters," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(5), pages 417-441, October.
    2. García-Díaz, Manuel & Pereiras, Bruno & Miguel-González, Celia & Rodríguez, Laudino & Fernández-Oro, Jesús, 2021. "Design of a new turbine for OWC wave energy converters: The DDT concept," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 404-413.
    3. Tunde Aderinto & Hua Li, 2018. "Ocean Wave Energy Converters: Status and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Gallagher, Sarah & Tiron, Roxana & Whelan, Eoin & Gleeson, Emily & Dias, Frédéric & McGrath, Ray, 2016. "The nearshore wind and wave energy potential of Ireland: A high resolution assessment of availability and accessibility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 494-516.
    5. Wen, Yi & Kamranzad, Bahareh & Lin, Pengzhi, 2021. "Assessment of long-term offshore wind energy potential in the south and southeast coasts of China based on a 55-year dataset," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    6. McMorland, J. & Collu, M. & McMillan, D. & Carroll, J. & Coraddu, A., 2023. "Opportunistic maintenance for offshore wind: A review and proposal of future framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Dalton, Gordon & Allan, Grant & Beaumont, Nicola & Georgakaki, Aliki & Hacking, Nick & Hooper, Tara & Kerr, Sandy & O’Hagan, Anne Marie & Reilly, Kieran & Ricci, Pierpaolo & Sheng, Wanan & Stallard, T, 2015. "Economic and socio-economic assessment methods for ocean renewable energy: Public and private perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 850-878.
    8. Lavidas, George, 2020. "Selection index for Wave Energy Deployments (SIWED): A near-deterministic index for wave energy converters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Choupin, Ophelie & Del Río-Gamero, B. & Schallenberg-Rodríguez, Julieta & Yánez-Rosales, Pablo, 2022. "Integration of assessment-methods for wave renewable energy: Resource and installation feasibility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 455-482.
    10. Gilbert, Ciaran & Browell, Jethro & McMillan, David, 2021. "Probabilistic access forecasting for improved offshore operations," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 134-150.
    11. Muhammed Zafar Ali Khan & Haider Ali Khan & Muhammad Aziz, 2022. "Harvesting Energy from Ocean: Technologies and Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-43, May.
    12. López-Ruiz, Alejandro & Bergillos, Rafael J. & Ortega-Sánchez, Miguel, 2016. "The importance of wave climate forecasting on the decision-making process for nearshore wave energy exploitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 191-203.
    13. Florin Onea & Eugen Rusu, 2019. "An Assessment of Wind Energy Potential in the Caspian Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Uihlein, Andreas & Magagna, Davide, 2016. "Wave and tidal current energy – A review of the current state of research beyond technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1070-1081.
    15. Walsh, Jodi & Bashir, Imran & Garrett, Joanne K. & Thies, Philipp R. & Blondel, Philippe & Johanning, Lars, 2017. "Monitoring the condition of Marine Renewable Energy Devices through underwater Acoustic Emissions: Case study of a Wave Energy Converter in Falmouth Bay, UK," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PA), pages 205-213.
    16. Mérigaud, Alexis & Ringwood, John V., 2016. "Condition-based maintenance methods for marine renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 53-78.
    17. Farrell, Niall & Donoghue, Cathal O’ & Morrissey, Karyn, 2015. "Quantifying the uncertainty of wave energy conversion device cost for policy appraisal: An Irish case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 62-77.
    18. Choupin, O. & Pinheiro Andutta, F. & Etemad-Shahidi, A. & Tomlinson, R., 2021. "A decision-making process for wave energy converter and location pairing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    19. Tiron, Roxana & Mallon, Fionn & Dias, Frédéric & Reynaud, Emmanuel G., 2015. "The challenging life of wave energy devices at sea: A few points to consider," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1263-1272.
    20. Salari, Mahdi Ebrahimi & Coleman, Joseph & Toal, Daniel, 2019. "Analysis of direct interconnection technique for offshore airborne wind energy systems under normal and fault conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 284-296.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:8946-:d:984965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.