IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i5p1290-d506463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting of 10-Second Power Demand of Highly Variable Loads for Microgrid Operation Control

Author

Listed:
  • Mirosław Parol

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75 Street, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Paweł Piotrowski

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75 Street, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Piotr Kapler

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75 Street, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Mariusz Piotrowski

    (MP System Mariusz Piotrowski, Przejezdna 6/25 Street, 16-001 Ignatki-Osiedle, Poland)

Abstract

This paper addresses very short-term (10 s) forecasting of power demand of highly variable loads. The main purpose of this study is to develop methods useful for this type of forecast. We have completed a comprehensive study using two different time series, which are very difficult to access in practice, of 10 s power demand characterized by big dynamics of load changes. This is an emerging and promising forecasting research topic, yet to be more widely recognized in the forecasting research community. This problem is particularly important in microgrids, i.e., small energy micro-systems. Power demand forecasting, like forecasting of renewable power generation, is of key importance, especially in island mode operation of microgrids. This is due to the necessity of ensuring reliable power supplies to consumers. Inaccurate very short-term forecasts can cause improper operation of microgrids or increase costs/decrease profits in the electricity market. This paper presents a detailed statistical analysis of data for two sample low voltage loads characterized by large variability, which are located in a sewage treatment plant. The experience of the authors of this paper is that very short-term forecasting is very difficult for such loads. Special attention has been paid to different forecasting methods, which can be applied to this type of forecast, and to the selection of explanatory variables in these methods. Some of the ensemble models (eight selected models belonging to the following classes of methods: random forest regression, gradient boosted trees, weighted averaging ensemble, machine learning) proposed in the scope of choice of methods sets constituting the models set are unique models developed by the authors of this study. The obtained forecasts are presented and analyzed in detail. Moreover, qualitative analysis of the forecasts obtained has been carried out. We analyze various measures of forecasts quality. We think that some of the presented forecasting methods are promising for practical applications, i.e., for microgrid operation control, because of their accuracy and stability. The analysis of usefulness of various forecasting methods for two independent time series is an essential, very valuable element of the study carried out. Thanks to this, reliability of conclusions concerning the preferred methods has considerably increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirosław Parol & Paweł Piotrowski & Piotr Kapler & Mariusz Piotrowski, 2021. "Forecasting of 10-Second Power Demand of Highly Variable Loads for Microgrid Operation Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:1290-:d:506463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1290/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1290/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rana Muhammad Adnan & Zhongmin Liang & Xiaohui Yuan & Ozgur Kisi & Muhammad Akhlaq & Binquan Li, 2019. "Comparison of LSSVR, M5RT, NF-GP, and NF-SC Models for Predictions of Hourly Wind Speed and Wind Power Based on Cross-Validation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Haoran Zhao & Huiru Zhao & Sen Guo, 2018. "Short-Term Wind Electric Power Forecasting Using a Novel Multi-Stage Intelligent Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Jing Huang & John Boland, 2018. "Performance Analysis for One-Step-Ahead Forecasting of Hybrid Solar and Wind Energy on Short Time Scales," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Namrye Son & Seunghak Yang & Jeongseung Na, 2019. "Hybrid Forecasting Model for Short-Term Wind Power Prediction Using Modified Long Short-Term Memory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Javier Huertas Tato & Miguel Centeno Brito, 2018. "Using Smart Persistence and Random Forests to Predict Photovoltaic Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Sizhou Sun & Jingqi Fu & Ang Li, 2019. "A Compound Wind Power Forecasting Strategy Based on Clustering, Two-Stage Decomposition, Parameter Optimization, and Optimal Combination of Multiple Machine Learning Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Neeraj Bokde & Andrés Feijóo & Daniel Villanueva & Kishore Kulat, 2019. "A Review on Hybrid Empirical Mode Decomposition Models for Wind Speed and Wind Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-42, January.
    8. Friedman, Jerome H., 2002. "Stochastic gradient boosting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 367-378, February.
    9. Dongxiao Niu & Di Pu & Shuyu Dai, 2018. "Ultra-Short-Term Wind-Power Forecasting Based on the Weighted Random Forest Optimized by the Niche Immune Lion Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Jianguo Zhou & Xuechao Yu & Baoling Jin, 2018. "Short-Term Wind Power Forecasting: A New Hybrid Model Combined Extreme-Point Symmetric Mode Decomposition, Extreme Learning Machine and Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Fang Liu & Ranran Li & Aliona Dreglea, 2019. "Wind Speed and Power Ultra Short-Term Robust Forecasting Based on Takagi–Sugeno Fuzzy Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paweł Piotrowski & Dariusz Baczyński & Marcin Kopyt & Tomasz Gulczyński, 2022. "Advanced Ensemble Methods Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning for One-Day-Ahead Forecasts of Electric Energy Production in Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    2. Paweł Piotrowski & Mirosław Parol & Piotr Kapler & Bartosz Fetliński, 2022. "Advanced Forecasting Methods of 5-Minute Power Generation in a PV System for Microgrid Operation Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Venkataramana Veeramsetty & Arjun Mohnot & Gaurav Singal & Surender Reddy Salkuti, 2021. "Short Term Active Power Load Prediction on A 33/11 kV Substation Using Regression Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Grzegorz Dudek, 2021. "Short-Term Load Forecasting Using Neural Networks with Pattern Similarity-Based Error Weights," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Dimitris Al. Katsaprakakis & Apostolos Michopoulos & Vasiliki Skoulou & Eirini Dakanali & Aggeliki Maragkaki & Stavroula Pappa & Ioannis Antonakakis & Dimitris Christakis & Constantinos Condaxakis, 2022. "A Multidisciplinary Approach for an Effective and Rational Energy Transition in Crete Island, Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-49, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paweł Piotrowski & Mirosław Parol & Piotr Kapler & Bartosz Fetliński, 2022. "Advanced Forecasting Methods of 5-Minute Power Generation in a PV System for Microgrid Operation Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Zhengxuan Xiao & Fei Tang & Mengyuan Wang, 2023. "Wind Power Short-Term Forecasting Method Based on LSTM and Multiple Error Correction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Manisha Sawant & Rupali Patil & Tanmay Shikhare & Shreyas Nagle & Sakshi Chavan & Shivang Negi & Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde, 2022. "A Selective Review on Recent Advancements in Long, Short and Ultra-Short-Term Wind Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Alexandru Pîrjan & George Căruțașu & Dana-Mihaela Petroșanu, 2018. "Designing, Developing, and Implementing a Forecasting Method for the Produced and Consumed Electricity in the Case of Small Wind Farms Situated on Quite Complex Hilly Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-42, October.
    5. Nathan Oaks Farrar & Mohd Hasan Ali & Dipankar Dasgupta, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Grid Connected Wind Turbine Control Systems: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Wang, Cong & Zhang, Hongli & Ma, Ping, 2020. "Wind power forecasting based on singular spectrum analysis and a new hybrid Laguerre neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Guangyu Qin & Qingyou Yan & Jingyao Zhu & Chuanbo Xu & Daniel M. Kammen, 2021. "Day-Ahead Wind Power Forecasting Based on Wind Load Data Using Hybrid Optimization Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Xiaolu Chen & Ji Han & Tingting Zheng & Ping Zhang & Simo Duan & Shihong Miao, 2019. "A Vine-Copula Based Voltage State Assessment with Wind Power Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Daniel Vassallo & Raghavendra Krishnamurthy & Thomas Sherman & Harindra J. S. Fernando, 2020. "Analysis of Random Forest Modeling Strategies for Multi-Step Wind Speed Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Evangelos Spiliotis & Fotios Petropoulos & Konstantinos Nikolopoulos, 2020. "The Impact of Imperfect Weather Forecasts on Wind Power Forecasting Performance: Evidence from Two Wind Farms in Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Muhammad Ahsan Zamee & Dongjun Won, 2020. "Novel Mode Adaptive Artificial Neural Network for Dynamic Learning: Application in Renewable Energy Sources Power Generation Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    12. Paweł Piotrowski & Inajara Rutyna & Dariusz Baczyński & Marcin Kopyt, 2022. "Evaluation Metrics for Wind Power Forecasts: A Comprehensive Review and Statistical Analysis of Errors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-38, December.
    13. Mansoor, Umer & Jamal, Arshad & Su, Junbiao & Sze, N.N. & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Investigating the risk factors of motorcycle crash injury severity in Pakistan: Insights and policy recommendations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 21-38.
    14. Bissan Ghaddar & Ignacio Gómez-Casares & Julio González-Díaz & Brais González-Rodríguez & Beatriz Pateiro-López & Sofía Rodríguez-Ballesteros, 2023. "Learning for Spatial Branching: An Algorithm Selection Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1024-1043, September.
    15. Akash Malhotra, 2018. "A hybrid econometric-machine learning approach for relative importance analysis: Prioritizing food policy," Papers 1806.04517, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    16. Nahushananda Chakravarthy H G & Karthik M Seenappa & Sujay Raghavendra Naganna & Dayananda Pruthviraja, 2023. "Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of the Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Incinerated Bio-Medical Waste Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Tim Voigt & Martin Kohlhase & Oliver Nelles, 2021. "Incremental DoE and Modeling Methodology with Gaussian Process Regression: An Industrially Applicable Approach to Incorporate Expert Knowledge," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-26, October.
    18. Wen, Shaoting & Buyukada, Musa & Evrendilek, Fatih & Liu, Jingyong, 2020. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of co-combustion/pyrolysis of textile dyeing sludge and incense sticks: Regression and machine-learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 463-474.
    19. Zhu, Haibin & Bai, Lu & He, Lidan & Liu, Zhi, 2023. "Forecasting realized volatility with machine learning: Panel data perspective," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 251-271.
    20. Spiliotis, Evangelos & Makridakis, Spyros & Kaltsounis, Anastasios & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2021. "Product sales probabilistic forecasting: An empirical evaluation using the M5 competition data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:1290-:d:506463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.