IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i4p892-d496036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency of a Fence of Tidal Turbines in the Alderney Race: Comparison between Analytical and Numerical Models

Author

Listed:
  • Jérôme Thiébot

    (LUSAC, UNICAEN, Normandie Université, 60 Rue Max Pol Fouchet, CS 20082, 50130 Cherbourg en Cotentin, France)

  • Nasteho Djama Dirieh

    (LUSAC, UNICAEN, Normandie Université, 60 Rue Max Pol Fouchet, CS 20082, 50130 Cherbourg en Cotentin, France)

  • Sylvain Guillou

    (LUSAC, UNICAEN, Normandie Université, 60 Rue Max Pol Fouchet, CS 20082, 50130 Cherbourg en Cotentin, France)

  • Nicolas Guillou

    (Laboratoire de Génie Côtier et Environnement, ER, Cerema, 155 Rue Pierre Bouguer, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, BP 5, 29280 Plouzané, France)

Abstract

Assessing the efficiency of a tidal turbine array is necessary for adequate device positioning and the reliable evaluation of annual energy production. Array efficiency depends on hydrodynamic characteristics, operating conditions, and blockage effects, and is commonly evaluated by relying on analytical models or more complex numerical simulations. By applying the conservations of mass, momentum, and energy in an idealized flow field, analytical models derive formulations of turbines’ thrust and power as a function of the induction factor (change in the current velocity induced by turbines). This simplified approach also gives a preliminary characterization of the influence of blockage on array efficiency. Numerical models with turbines represented as actuator disks also enable the assessment of the efficiency of a tidal array. We compare here these two approaches, considering the numerical model as a reference as it includes more physics than the analytical models. The actuator disk approach is applied to the three-dimensional model Telemac3D in realistic flow conditions and for different operating scenarios. Reference results are compared to those obtained from three analytical models that permit the investigation of the flow within tidal farm integrating or excluding processes such as the deformation of the free surface or the effects of global blockage. The comparison is applied to the deployment of a fence of turbines in the Alderney Race (macro-tidal conditions of the English Channel, northwest European shelf). Efficiency estimates are found to vary significantly from one model to another. The main result is that analytical models predict lower efficiency as they fail to approach realistically the flow structure in the vicinity of turbines, especially because they neglect the three-dimensional effects and turbulent mixing. This finding implies that the tidal energy yield potential could be larger than previously estimated (with analytical models).

Suggested Citation

  • Jérôme Thiébot & Nasteho Djama Dirieh & Sylvain Guillou & Nicolas Guillou, 2021. "The Efficiency of a Fence of Tidal Turbines in the Alderney Race: Comparison between Analytical and Numerical Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:892-:d:496036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/892/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/892/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coles, D.S. & Blunden, L.S. & Bahaj, A.S., 2017. "Assessment of the energy extraction potential at tidal sites around the Channel Islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 171-186.
    2. Mikaël Grondeau & Sylvain Guillou & Philippe Mercier & Emmanuel Poizot, 2019. "Wake of a Ducted Vertical Axis Tidal Turbine in Turbulent Flows, LBM Actuator-Line Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Nguyen, Van Thinh & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Santa Cruz, Alina, 2016. "Modelling turbulence with an Actuator Disk representing a tidal turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 625-635.
    4. Thiébot, Jérôme & Guillou, Nicolas & Guillou, Sylvain & Good, Andrew & Lewis, Michael, 2020. "Wake field study of tidal turbines under realistic flow conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1196-1208.
    5. Pinon, Grégory & Mycek, Paul & Germain, Grégory & Rivoalen, Elie, 2012. "Numerical simulation of the wake of marine current turbines with a particle method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 111-126.
    6. Van Thinh Nguyen & Alina Santa Cruz & Sylvain S. Guillou & Mohamad N. Shiekh Elsouk & Jérôme Thiébot, 2019. "Effects of the Current Direction on the Energy Production of a Tidal Farm: The Case of Raz Blanchard (France)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Huakun & Xue, Wendong & Jiang, Peng & Li, Yong, 2022. "Bibliometric analysis for ocean renewable energy: An comprehensive review for hotspots, frontiers, and emerging trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Nasteho Djama Dirieh & Jérôme Thiébot & Sylvain Guillou & Nicolas Guillou, 2022. "Blockage Corrections for Tidal Turbines—Application to an Array of Turbines in the Alderney Race," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Sylvain S. Guillou & Eric Bibeau, 2023. "Tidal Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-5, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laurie Jégo & Sylvain S. Guillou, 2021. "Study of a Bi-Vertical Axis Turbines Farm Using the Actuator Cylinder Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Thiébot, Jérôme & Guillou, Nicolas & Guillou, Sylvain & Good, Andrew & Lewis, Michael, 2020. "Wake field study of tidal turbines under realistic flow conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1196-1208.
    3. Nasteho Djama Dirieh & Jérôme Thiébot & Sylvain Guillou & Nicolas Guillou, 2022. "Blockage Corrections for Tidal Turbines—Application to an Array of Turbines in the Alderney Race," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Christelle Auguste & Philip Marsh & Jean-Roch Nader & Remo Cossu & Irene Penesis, 2020. "Towards a Tidal Farm in Banks Strait, Tasmania: Influence of Tidal Array on Hydrodynamics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Thiébaut, Maxime & Filipot, Jean-François & Maisondieu, Christophe & Damblans, Guillaume & Duarte, Rui & Droniou, Eloi & Chaplain, Nicolas & Guillou, Sylvain, 2020. "A comprehensive assessment of turbulence at a tidal-stream energy site influenced by wind-generated ocean waves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Van Thinh Nguyen & Alina Santa Cruz & Sylvain S. Guillou & Mohamad N. Shiekh Elsouk & Jérôme Thiébot, 2019. "Effects of the Current Direction on the Energy Production of a Tidal Farm: The Case of Raz Blanchard (France)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Yang, Zhixue & Ren, Zhouyang & Li, Hui & Pan, Zhen & Xia, Weiyi, 2024. "A review of tidal current power generation farm planning: Methodologies, characteristics and challenges," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    8. Pierre-Luc Delafin & François Deniset & Jacques André Astolfi & Frédéric Hauville, 2021. "Performance Improvement of a Darrieus Tidal Turbine with Active Variable Pitch," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Chen, Yaling & Lin, Binliang & Lin, Jie & Wang, Shujie, 2017. "Experimental study of wake structure behind a horizontal axis tidal stream turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 82-96.
    10. Thiébaut, Maxime & Quillien, Nolwenn & Maison, Antoine & Gaborieau, Herveline & Ruiz, Nicolas & MacKenzie, Seumas & Connor, Gary & Filipot, Jean-François, 2022. "Investigating the flow dynamics and turbulence at a tidal-stream energy site in a highly energetic estuary," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 252-262.
    11. Zhang, Yidan & Shek, Jonathan K.H. & Mueller, Markus A., 2023. "Controller design for a tidal turbine array, considering both power and loads aspects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Myriam Slama & Camille Choma Bex & Grégory Pinon & Michael Togneri & Iestyn Evans, 2021. "Lagrangian Vortex Computations of a Four Tidal Turbine Array: An Example Based on the NEPTHYD Layout in the Alderney Race," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Hannah Mullings & Samuel Draycott & Jérôme Thiébot & Sylvain Guillou & Philippe Mercier & Jon Hardwick & Ed Mackay & Philipp Thies & Tim Stallard, 2023. "Evaluation of Model Predictions of the Unsteady Tidal Stream Resource and Turbine Fatigue Loads Relative to Multi-Point Flow Measurements at Raz Blanchard," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-30, October.
    14. Tian, Linlin & Song, Yilei & Wang, Zhenming & Zhao, Ning & Zhu, Chunling & Lu, Xiyun, 2024. "Predictive capability of an improved AD/RANS method for multiple wind turbines and wind farm wakes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    15. Draycott, S. & Sellar, B. & Davey, T. & Noble, D.R. & Venugopal, V. & Ingram, D.M., 2019. "Capture and simulation of the ocean environment for offshore renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 15-29.
    16. Moreau, Martin & Bloch, Noam & Germain, Grégory & Maurice, Guillaume, 2024. "Experimental study of the upstream bathymetry effects on a ducted twin vertical axis turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    17. Garcia-Novo, Patxi & Inubuse, Masako & Matsuno, Takeshi & Kyozuka, Yusaku & Archer, Philip & Matsuo, Hiroshi & Henzan, Katsuhiro & Sakaguchi, Daisaku, 2024. "Characterization of the wake generated downstream of a MW-scale tidal turbine in Naru Strait, Japan, based on vessel-mounted ADCP data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    18. Mycek, Paul & Gaurier, Benoît & Germain, Grégory & Pinon, Grégory & Rivoalen, Elie, 2014. "Experimental study of the turbulence intensity effects on marine current turbines behaviour. Part II: Two interacting turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 876-892.
    19. Yang, Xiaolei & Khosronejad, Ali & Sotiropoulos, Fotis, 2017. "Large-eddy simulation of a hydrokinetic turbine mounted on an erodible bed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1419-1433.
    20. Goss, Z.L. & Coles, D.S. & Kramer, S.C. & Piggott, M.D., 2021. "Efficient economic optimisation of large-scale tidal stream arrays," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:892-:d:496036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.