IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i3p586-d486116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preliminary Evaluation of a Rooftop Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System Installation under the Climatic Conditions of Texas (USA)

Author

Listed:
  • Fadhil Y. Al-Aboosi

    (Gas and Fuels Research Center, Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Abdullah F. Al-Aboosi

    (Electronic Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

Abstract

Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems have demonstrated growing competitiveness as a viable alternative to fossil fuel-based power plants to mitigate the negative impact of fossil energy sources on the environment. Notwithstanding, solar PV technology has not made yet a meaningful contribution in most countries globally. This study aims to encourage the adoption of solar PV systems on rooftop buildings in countries which have a good solar energy potential, and even if they are oil or gas producers, based on the obtained results of a proposed PV system. The performance of a rooftop grid-tied 3360 kW p PV system was analyzed by considering technical, economic, and environmental criteria, solar irradiance intensity, two modes of single-axis tracking, shadow effect, PV cell temperature impact on system efficiency, and Texas A&M University as a case study. The evaluated parameters of the proposed system include energy output, array yield, final yield, array and system losses, capacity factor, performance ratio, return on investment, payback period, Levelized cost of energy, and carbon emission. According to the overall performance results of the proposed PV system, it is found to be a technically, economically, and environmentally feasible solution for electricity generation and would play a significant role in the future energy mix of Texas.

Suggested Citation

  • Fadhil Y. Al-Aboosi & Abdullah F. Al-Aboosi, 2021. "Preliminary Evaluation of a Rooftop Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System Installation under the Climatic Conditions of Texas (USA)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-30, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:586-:d:486116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/3/586/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/3/586/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ubertini, Stefano & Desideri, Umberto, 2003. "Performance estimation and experimental measurements of a photovoltaic roof," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 1833-1850.
    2. Irene Romero-Fiances & Emilio Muñoz-Cerón & Rafael Espinoza-Paredes & Gustavo Nofuentes & Juan De la Casa, 2019. "Analysis of the Performance of Various PV Module Technologies in Peru," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Mayis G. Gulaliyev & Elchin R. Mustafayev & Gulsura Y. Mehdiyeva, 2020. "Assessment of Solar Energy Potential and Its Ecological-Economic Efficiency: Azerbaijan Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Muhammad Asif, 2016. "Urban Scale Application of Solar PV to Improve Sustainability in the Building and the Energy Sectors of KSA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-11, November.
    5. Pietruszko, S. M. & Gradzki, M., 2003. "Performance of a grid connected small PV system in Poland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-2), pages 177-184, January.
    6. Ozden, Talat & Akinoglu, Bulent G. & Turan, Rasit, 2017. "Long term outdoor performances of three different on-grid PV arrays in central Anatolia – An extended analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 182-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Artem Stopochkin & Inessa Sytnik, 2022. "Algorithm for Rapid Estimation of the Performance of Small Rooftop Solar PV Use by Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-29, May.
    2. Fernando del Ama Gonzalo & Belen Moreno Santamaria & José Antonio Ferrándiz Gea & Matthew Griffin & Juan A. Hernandez Ramos, 2021. "Zero Energy Building Economic and Energetic Assessment with Simulated and Real Data Using Photovoltaics and Water Flow Glazing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Sojung Kim & Sumin Kim, 2023. "Economic Feasibility Comparison between Building-Integrated Photovoltaics and Green Systems in Northeast Texas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Alfredo Nespoli & Andrea Matteri & Silvia Pretto & Luca De Ciechi & Emanuele Ogliari, 2021. "Battery Sizing for Different Loads and RES Production Scenarios through Unsupervised Clustering Methods," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Saad Odeh & Tri Hieu Nguyen, 2021. "Assessment Method to Identify the Potential of Rooftop PV Systems in the Residential Districts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-11, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agata Zdyb & Slawomir Gulkowski, 2020. "Performance Assessment of Four Different Photovoltaic Technologies in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Bouaichi, Abdellatif & El Amrani, Aumeur & Ouhadou, Malika & Lfakir, Aberrazak & Messaoudi, Choukri, 2020. "In-situ performance and degradation of three different photovoltaic module technologies installed in arid climate of Morocco," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Romero-Fiances, Irene & Livera, Andreas & Theristis, Marios & Makrides, George & Stein, Joshua S. & Nofuentes, Gustavo & de la Casa, Juan & Georghiou, George E., 2022. "Impact of duration and missing data on the long-term photovoltaic degradation rate estimation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 738-748.
    4. Irene Romero-Fiances & Emilio Muñoz-Cerón & Rafael Espinoza-Paredes & Gustavo Nofuentes & Juan De la Casa, 2019. "Analysis of the Performance of Various PV Module Technologies in Peru," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Dag, H.I. & Buker, M.S., 2020. "Performance evaluation and degradation assessment of crystalline silicon based photovoltaic rooftop technologies under outdoor conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1292-1300.
    6. Goel, Sonali & Sharma, Renu, 2017. "Performance evaluation of stand alone, grid connected and hybrid renewable energy systems for rural application: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1378-1389.
    7. Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Usman Mehmood & Salah Kamel & Mokhtar Shouran & Elmazeg Elgamli & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo, 2022. "Technical Performance Prediction and Employment Potential of Solar PV Systems in Cold Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Assoa, Y.B. & Levrard, D., 2020. "A lightweight triangular building integrated photovoltaic module," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    9. Purohit, Ishan & Purohit, Pallav, 2018. "Performance assessment of grid-interactive solar photovoltaic projects under India’s national solar mission," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 25-41.
    10. Yelin Dai & Yue Liu & Xuhui Ding & Chundu Wu & Yu Chen, 2022. "Environmental Regulation Promotes Eco-Efficiency through Industrial Transfer: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-31, August.
    11. Thopil, George Alex & Sachse, Christiaan Eddie & Lalk, Jörg & Thopil, Miriam Sara, 2020. "Techno-economic performance comparison of crystalline and thin film PV panels under varying meteorological conditions: A high solar resource southern hemisphere case," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    12. Hong, Taehoon & Koo, Choongwan & Kwak, Taehyun, 2013. "Framework for the implementation of a new renewable energy system in an educational facility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 539-551.
    13. Gaur, Ankita & Tiwari, G.N., 2014. "Performance of a-Si thin film PV modules with and without water flow: An experimental validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 184-191.
    14. Waad Bouaguel & Tagreed Alsulimani, 2022. "Understanding the Factors Influencing Consumers’ Intention toward Shifting to Solar Energy Technology for Residential Use in Saudi Arabia Using the Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Bianchini, Augusto & Gambuti, Michele & Pellegrini, Marco & Saccani, Cesare, 2016. "Performance analysis and economic assessment of different photovoltaic technologies based on experimental measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-11.
    16. Marcin Bukowski & Janusz Majewski & Agnieszka Sobolewska, 2020. "Macroeconomic Electric Energy Production Efficiency of Photovoltaic Panels in Single-Family Homes in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Ali, Hayder & Khan, Hassan Abbas, 2020. "Techno-economic evaluation of two 42 kWp polycrystalline-Si and CIS thin-film based PV rooftop systems in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 347-357.
    18. Chokmaviroj, Somchai & Wattanapong, Rakwichian & Suchart, Yammen, 2006. "Performance of a 500kWP grid connected photovoltaic system at Mae Hong Son Province, Thailand," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 19-28.
    19. Mehdi, Maryam & Ammari, Nabil & Alami Merrouni, Ahmed & El Gallassi, Hicham & Dahmani, Mohamed & Ghennioui, Abdellatif, 2023. "An experimental comparative analysis of different PV technologies performance including the influence of hot-arid climatic parameters: Toward a realistic yield assessment for desert locations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 695-716.
    20. Emmanuel, Michael & Akinyele, Daniel & Rayudu, Ramesh, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of a 10 kWp utility interactive photovoltaic system at Maungaraki school, Wellington, New Zealand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 573-583.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:586-:d:486116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.