IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i24p8517-d704699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Mean Field Game-Based Strategy for Charging Electric Vehicles in Solar Powered Parking Lots

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel M. Muhindo

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
    Groupe d’Études et de Recherche en Analyse des Décisions (GERAD), Montreal, QC H3T 2A7, Canada
    Réseau Québécois sur l’Énergie Intelligente (RQEI), Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada)

  • Roland P. Malhamé

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
    Groupe d’Études et de Recherche en Analyse des Décisions (GERAD), Montreal, QC H3T 2A7, Canada
    Réseau Québécois sur l’Énergie Intelligente (RQEI), Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada)

  • Geza Joos

    (Réseau Québécois sur l’Énergie Intelligente (RQEI), Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada
    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0E9, Canada)

Abstract

We develop a strategy, with concepts from Mean Field Games (MFG), to coordinate the charging of a large population of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) in a parking lot powered by solar energy and managed by an aggregator. A yearly parking fee is charged for each BEV irrespective of the amount of energy extracted. The goal is to share the energy available so as to minimize the standard deviation (STD) of the state of charge (SOC) of batteries when the BEVs are leaving the parking lot, while maintaining some fairness and decentralization criteria. The MFG charging laws correspond to the Nash equilibrium induced by quadratic cost functions based on an inverse Nash equilibrium concept and designed to favor the batteries with the lower SOCs upon arrival. While the MFG charging laws are strictly decentralized, they guarantee that a mean of instantaneous charging powers to the BEVs follows a trajectory based on the solar energy forecast for the day. That day ahead forecast is broadcasted to the BEVs which then gauge the necessary SOC upon leaving their home. We illustrate the advantages of the MFG strategy for the case of a typical sunny day and a typical cloudy day when compared to more straightforward strategies: first come first full/serve and equal sharing. The behavior of the charging strategies is contrasted under conditions of random arrivals and random departures of the BEVs in the parking lot.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel M. Muhindo & Roland P. Malhamé & Geza Joos, 2021. "A Novel Mean Field Game-Based Strategy for Charging Electric Vehicles in Solar Powered Parking Lots," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8517-:d:704699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tuchnitz, Felix & Ebell, Niklas & Schlund, Jonas & Pruckner, Marco, 2021. "Development and Evaluation of a Smart Charging Strategy for an Electric Vehicle Fleet Based on Reinforcement Learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin, Ruiyang & Zhou, Yuke & Lu, Chao & Song, Jie, 2022. "Deep reinforcement learning-based strategy for charging station participating in demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    2. Zhao, Zhonghao & Lee, Carman K.M. & Huo, Jiage, 2023. "EV charging station deployment on coupled transportation and power distribution networks via reinforcement learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    3. Aree Wangsupphaphol & Surachai Chaitusaney, 2022. "Subsidizing Residential Low Priority Smart Charging: A Power Management Strategy for Electric Vehicle in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Paudel, Diwas & Das, Tapas K., 2023. "A deep reinforcement learning approach for power management of battery-assisted fast-charging EV hubs participating in day-ahead and real-time electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Tao, Yuechuan & Qiu, Jing & Lai, Shuying & Sun, Xianzhuo & Zhao, Junhua & Zhou, Baorong & Cheng, Lanfen, 2022. "Data-driven on-demand energy supplement planning for electric vehicles considering multi-charging/swapping services," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    6. Wald, Dylan & King, Jennifer & Bay, Christopher J. & Chintala, Rohit & Johnson, Kathryn, 2022. "Integration of distributed controllers: Power reference tracking through charging station and building coordination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    7. Zeynali, Saeed & Nasiri, Nima & Marzband, Mousa & Ravadanegh, Sajad Najafi, 2021. "A hybrid robust-stochastic framework for strategic scheduling of integrated wind farm and plug-in hybrid electric vehicle fleets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    8. Ahmed M. Abed & Ali AlArjani, 2022. "The Neural Network Classifier Works Efficiently on Searching in DQN Using the Autonomous Internet of Things Hybridized by the Metaheuristic Techniques to Reduce the EVs’ Service Scheduling Time," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Zhao, Zhonghao & Lee, Carman K.M. & Ren, Jingzheng, 2024. "A two-level charging scheduling method for public electric vehicle charging stations considering heterogeneous demand and nonlinear charging profile," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    10. Cong Zhang & Jingchao Lian & Haitao Min & Ming Li, 2024. "Shanghai as a Model: Research on the Journey of Transportation Electrification and Charging Infrastructure Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Velkovski, Bodan & Gjorgievski, Vladimir Z. & Markovski, Blagoja & Cundeva, Snezana & Markovska, Natasa, 2024. "A framework for shared EV charging in residential renewable energy communities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    12. Omar Al-Ani & Sanjoy Das, 2022. "Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Applications in HEMS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-37, September.
    13. Li, Xiaohui & Wang, Zhenpo & Zhang, Lei & Sun, Fengchun & Cui, Dingsong & Hecht, Christopher & Figgener, Jan & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2023. "Electric vehicle behavior modeling and applications in vehicle-grid integration: An overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    14. Dimitrios Vamvakas & Panagiotis Michailidis & Christos Korkas & Elias Kosmatopoulos, 2023. "Review and Evaluation of Reinforcement Learning Frameworks on Smart Grid Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-38, July.
    15. Amjad, Muhammad & Farooq-i-Azam, Muhammad & Ni, Qiang & Dong, Mianxiong & Ansari, Ejaz Ahmad, 2022. "Wireless charging systems for electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Hu, Rong & Zhou, Kaile & Yin, Hui, 2024. "Reinforcement learning model for incentive-based integrated demand response considering demand-side coupling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    17. Castillo, Victhalia Zapata & Boer, Harmen-Sytze de & Muñoz, Raúl Maícas & Gernaat, David E.H.J. & Benders, René & van Vuuren, Detlef, 2022. "Future global electricity demand load curves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    18. Kimiya Noor ali & Mohammad Hemmati & Seyed Mahdi Miraftabzadeh & Younes Mohammadi & Navid Bayati, 2024. "A Mini Review of the Impacts of Machine Learning on Mobility Electrifications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-36, December.
    19. Nandan Gopinathan & Prabhakar Karthikeyan Shanmugam, 2022. "Energy Anxiety in Decentralized Electricity Markets: A Critical Review on EV Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-40, July.
    20. Manzolli, Jônatas Augusto & Trovão, João Pedro & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler, 2022. "A review of electric bus vehicles research topics – Methods and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8517-:d:704699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.