IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i24p8374-d700613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project Portfolio Selection of Solar Energy by Photovoltaic Generation Using Gini-CAPM Multi-Criteria and Considering ROI Covariations

Author

Listed:
  • José Claudio Isaias

    (Institute of Industrial Engineering and Management, Federal University of Itajubá, Itajubá 37500-903, Brazil)

  • Pedro Paulo Balestrassi

    (Institute of Industrial Engineering and Management, Federal University of Itajubá, Itajubá 37500-903, Brazil)

  • Guilherme Augusto Barucke Marcondes

    (Department of Computer Science, National Institute of Telecommunications, Santa Rita do Sapucaí 37504-000, Brazil)

  • Wesley Vieira da Silva

    (Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió 57072-970, Brazil)

  • Carlos Henrique Pereira Mello

    (Institute of Industrial Engineering and Management, Federal University of Itajubá, Itajubá 37500-903, Brazil)

  • Claudimar Pereira da Veiga

    (Department of General and Applied Administration, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba 80210-170, Brazil)

Abstract

For some time, renewable solar energy generations using cellular photovoltaic panels have stood out among the options, especially in the segment of micro and small companies, where the return on investment is usually higher. In this context, when micro and small companies do not have the capital for the enterprises, several others, mainly small ones, have emerged to finance. However, significant difficulties occur for financiers in selecting investment portfolios, especially when considering the trade-off between return and risk and the covariations of return on investment, which are very common. In this type of selection, the Capital Asset Pricing Model criteria using the Gini risk can help significantly because this one is a more robust risk coefficient for assessments of non-normal probability distributions. However, searches for methods that meet the selection needs using the adjacent criteria are unsuccessful. Thus, this work seeks to help minimize the gap by presenting a new method for selection using the criteria. Historical and simulations data stochastic evaluations indicate that the portfolios selected by the method are attractive options for implementations. These portfolios have reasonable probabilistic expectations and satisfactory protection to avoid mistakes caused for not considering covariations in return on investment, which indicates a significant advance on the current knowledge frontier and will likely allow the increased use of the concept. The method also presents theoretical contributions in adaptations of the benchmark models, which help to minimize the adjacent literary gap of similar methods.

Suggested Citation

  • José Claudio Isaias & Pedro Paulo Balestrassi & Guilherme Augusto Barucke Marcondes & Wesley Vieira da Silva & Carlos Henrique Pereira Mello & Claudimar Pereira da Veiga, 2021. "Project Portfolio Selection of Solar Energy by Photovoltaic Generation Using Gini-CAPM Multi-Criteria and Considering ROI Covariations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8374-:d:700613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8374/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8374/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayoub, Nasser & Yuji, Naka, 2012. "Governmental intervention approaches to promote renewable energies—Special emphasis on Japanese feed-in tariff," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 191-201.
    2. Abdmouleh, Zeineb & Alammari, Rashid A.M. & Gastli, Adel, 2015. "Review of policies encouraging renewable energy integration & best practices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 249-262.
    3. Steffen, Bjarne, 2020. "Estimating the cost of capital for renewable energy projects," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Shalit, Haim & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 1984. "Mean-Gini, Portfolio Theory, and the Pricing of Risky Assets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1449-1468, December.
    5. Lee, Minhyun & Hong, Taehoon & Koo, Choongwan, 2016. "An economic impact analysis of state solar incentives for improving financial performance of residential solar photovoltaic systems in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 590-607.
    6. Paulino Martinez-Fernandez & Fernando deLlano-Paz & Anxo Calvo-Silvosa & Isabel Soares, 2019. "Assessing Renewable Energy Sources for Electricity (RES-E) Potential Using a CAPM-Analogous Multi-Stage Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Khan, Firoz & Al-Ahmed, Amir & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A., 2021. "Critical analysis of the limitations and validity of the assumptions with the analytical methods commonly used to determine the photovoltaic cell parameters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    8. Luz, Thiago & Moura, Pedro & de Almeida, Aníbal, 2018. "Multi-objective power generation expansion planning with high penetration of renewables," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2637-2643.
    9. Alceu Souza & Ariane Maria Machado de Oliveira & Dayla Karolina Fossile & Emmanuel Óguchi Ogu & Luciano Luiz Dalazen & Claudimar Pereira da Veiga, 2020. "Business Plan Analysis Using Multi-Index Methodology: Expectations of Return and Perceived Risks," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    10. Kourtis, Apostolos, 2016. "The Sharpe ratio of estimated efficient portfolios," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 72-78.
    11. Davis, William & Martín, Mariano, 2014. "Optimal year-round operation for methane production from CO2 and water using wind energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 497-505.
    12. Maller, Ross & Roberts, Steven & Tourky, Rabee, 2016. "The large-sample distribution of the maximum Sharpe ratio with and without short sales," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 138-152.
    13. Eleftheriadis, Iordanis M. & Anagnostopoulou, Evgenia G., 2015. "Identifying barriers in the diffusion of renewable energy sources," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 153-164.
    14. Haim Shalit & Shlomo Yitzhaki, 2005. "The Mean‐Gini Efficient Portfolio Frontier," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 28(1), pages 59-75, March.
    15. Ringuest, Jeffrey L. & Graves, Samuel B. & Case, Randy H., 2004. "Mean-Gini analysis in R&D portfolio selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(1), pages 157-169, April.
    16. Bertoldi, Paolo & Rezessy, Silvia & Oikonomou, Vlasis, 2013. "Rewarding energy savings rather than energy efficiency: Exploring the concept of a feed-in tariff for energy savings," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 526-535.
    17. Zabarankin, Michael & Pavlikov, Konstantin & Uryasev, Stan, 2014. "Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) with drawdown measure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 508-517.
    18. Guilherme Augusto Barucke Marcondes & Rafael Coradi Leme & Marcela da Silveira Leme & Carlos Eduardo Sanches da Silva, 2017. "Using mean-Gini and stochastic dominance to choose project portfolios with parameter uncertainty," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(1), pages 33-53, January.
    19. Okunev, John & Dillon, John L., 1988. "A linear programming algorithm for determining mean-Gini efficient farm plans," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 2(3), pages 273-285, November.
    20. Izadbakhsh, Maziar & Gandomkar, Majid & Rezvani, Alireza & Ahmadi, Abdollah, 2015. "Short-term resource scheduling of a renewable energy based micro grid," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 598-606.
    21. Helal Zaabi & Hamdi Bashir, 2020. "Modeling and analyzing project interdependencies in project portfolios using an integrated social network analysis-fuzzy TOPSIS MICMAC approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1083-1106, December.
    22. de Faria, Haroldo & Trigoso, Federico B.M. & Cavalcanti, João A.M., 2017. "Review of distributed generation with photovoltaic grid connected systems in Brazil: Challenges and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 469-475.
    23. Auer, Benjamin R. & Schuhmacher, Frank, 2013. "Performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio: The case of hedge funds," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 196-208.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Oliveira, Lucas Guedes & Aquila, Giancarlo & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo & de Paiva, Anderson Paulo & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo & de Oliveira Pamplona, Edson & Camatta, Ulisses Pessin, 2020. "Evaluating economic feasibility and maximization of social welfare of photovoltaic projects developed for the Brazilian northeastern coast: An attribute agreement analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Ran Ji & Miguel A. Lejeune & Srinivas Y. Prasad, 2017. "Properties, formulations, and algorithms for portfolio optimization using Mean-Gini criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 305-343, January.
    3. Aquila, Giancarlo & Pamplona, Edson de Oliveira & Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo de & Rotela Junior, Paulo & Fonseca, Marcelo Nunes, 2017. "An overview of incentive policies for the expansion of renewable energy generation in electricity power systems and the Brazilian experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1090-1098.
    4. Rocha, Luiz Célio Souza & Aquila, Giancarlo & Rotela Junior, Paulo & Paiva, Anderson Paulo de & Pamplona, Edson de Oliveira & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo, 2018. "A stochastic economic viability analysis of residential wind power generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 412-419.
    5. Amine Lahiani & Sinha Avik & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2018. "Renewable energy consumption, income, CO2 emissions and oil prices in G7 countries: The importance of asymmetries," Post-Print hal-03677233, HAL.
    6. Fontanari Andrea & Cirillo Pasquale & Oosterlee Cornelis W., 2020. "Lorenz-generated bivariate Archimedean copulas," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 186-209, January.
    7. Hossein Heirani & Naser Bagheri Moghaddam & Sina Labbafi & Seyedali Sina, 2022. "A Business Model for Developing Distributed Photovoltaic Systems in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Fontanari, Andrea & Cirillo, Pasquale & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2018. "From Concentration Profiles to Concentration Maps. New tools for the study of loss distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 13-29.
    9. Doron Nisani, 2019. "Ranking Investments Using the Lorenz Curve," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(1), pages 1-9, March.
    10. Aquila, Giancarlo & Souza Rocha, Luiz Célio & Rotela Junior, Paulo & Saab Junior, Joseph Youssif & de Sá Brasil Lima, João & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo, 2020. "Economic planning of wind farms from a NBI-RSM-DEA multiobjective programming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 628-641.
    11. Aquila, Giancarlo & Coelho, Eden de Oliveira Pinto & Bonatto, Benedito Donizeti & Pamplona, Edson de Oliveira & Nakamura, Wilson Toshiro, 2021. "Perspective of uncertainty and risk from the CVaR-LCOE approach: An analysis of the case of PV microgeneration in Minas Gerais, Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. Miguel A. Lejeune & John Turner, 2019. "Planning Online Advertising Using Gini Indices," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1222-1245, September.
    13. Polzin, Friedemann & Egli, Florian & Steffen, Bjarne & Schmidt, Tobias S., 2019. "How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy?—A systematic review with an investor perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1249-1268.
    14. Bai, Bo & Wang, Yihan & Fang, Cong & Xiong, Siqin & Ma, Xiaoming, 2021. "Efficient deployment of solar photovoltaic stations in China: An economic and environmental perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Maria-Teresa Bosch-Badia & Joan Montllor-Serrats & Maria-Antonia Tarrazon-Rodon, 2017. "Analysing assets’ performance inside a portfolio: From crossed beta to the net risk premium ratio," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1270251-127, January.
    16. Shlomo Yitzhaki, 2003. "Gini’s Mean difference: a superior measure of variability for non-normal distributions," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(2), pages 285-316.
    17. Habibeh Sherafatmand & Saeed Yazdani, 2014. "The management of price risk in Iranian dates: An application of futures instruments," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Dalton Garcia Borges de Souza & Erivelton Antonio dos Santos & Nei Yoshihiro Soma & Carlos Eduardo Sanches da Silva, 2021. "MCDM-Based R&D Project Selection: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-34, October.
    19. Haim Shalit, 2021. "The Shapley value decomposition of optimal portfolios," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Doron Nisani & Amit Shelef, 2021. "A statistical analysis of investor preferences for portfolio selection," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1883-1915, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8374-:d:700613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.