IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i21p7113-d669673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coopetitive Platform: Common Benefits in Electricity and Gas Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Wojciech Czakon

    (Department of Strategic Management, Jagiellonian University, Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków, Poland)

  • Karolina Mucha-Kuś

    (Department of Management, WSB University, Cieplaka 1c, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland)

  • Maciej Sołtysik

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Częstochowa University of Technology, Armii Krajowej 17, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland)

Abstract

Simultaneous collaboration and competition, or coopetition, has so far been studied among firms or non-profit organizations, leaving the public arena largely unexplored. This study focuses on identifying and measuring common benefit generation by local government actors in coopetition. We purposefully choose a metropolis composed of 41 municipalities setting to identify and measure those effects of coopetition that cannot be achieved by individual actors alone. We use real data and tariffs to run simulations that identify common and individual benefits generated in gas and electricity distribution. We find that savings can be achieved by mutualizing energy procurement, even though the distribution of savings is not equal among municipalities. We substantiate that energy communities can act as coopetitive platforms to optimize energy costs of municipalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Wojciech Czakon & Karolina Mucha-Kuś & Maciej Sołtysik, 2021. "Coopetitive Platform: Common Benefits in Electricity and Gas Distribution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7113-:d:669673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7113/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7113/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frédéric Le Roy & Famara Hyacinthe Sanou, 2014. "Does Coopetition Strategy Improve Market Performance? An Empirical Study in Mobile Phone Industry," Post-Print hal-02050858, HAL.
    2. Eunice Espe & Vidyasagar Potdar & Elizabeth Chang, 2018. "Prosumer Communities and Relationships in Smart Grids: A Literature Review, Evolution and Future Directions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Oliver Gernsheimer & Dominik K Kanbach & Johanna Gast, 2021. "Coopetition research-A systematic literature review on recent accomplishments and trajectories," Post-Print hal-03514794, HAL.
    4. Karolina Mucha-Kuś & Maciej Sołtysik & Krzysztof Zamasz & Katarzyna Szczepańska-Woszczyna, 2021. "Coopetitive Nature of Energy Communities—The Energy Transition Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Jakub Jasiński & Mariusz Kozakiewicz & Maciej Sołtysik, 2021. "The Effectiveness of Energy Cooperatives Operating on the Capacity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Gnyawali, Devi R. & Park, Byung-Jin (Robert), 2011. "Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 650-663, June.
    7. Mateusz Andrychowicz, 2020. "Comparison of the Use of Energy Storages and Energy Curtailment as an Addition to the Allocation of Renewable Energy in the Distribution System in Order to Minimize Development Costs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Della Corte, Valentina & Aria, Massimo, 2016. "Coopetition and sustainable competitive advantage. The case of tourist destinations," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 524-540.
    9. Frank Robert & Pierre Marques & Frederic Le Roy, 2009. "Coopetition between SMEs: an empirical study of French professional football," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 23-43.
    10. Wojciech Czakon & Devi Gnyawali & Frédéric Le Roy & Manish K. Srivastava, 2020. "Coopetition Strategies: Critical Issues and Research Directions," Post-Print hal-02517434, HAL.
    11. Albert-Cromarias, Anne & Dos Santos, Catherine, 2020. "Coopetition in healthcare: Heresy or reality? An exploration of felt outcomes at an intra-organizational level," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    12. Frédéric Le Roy & Wojciech Czakon, 2016. "Managing coopetition: the missing link between strategy and performance," Post-Print hal-02012534, HAL.
    13. Anne Albert-Cromarias & Catherine dos Santos, 2020. "Coopetition in healthcare: Heresy or reality? An exploration of felt outcomes at an intra-organizational level," Post-Print hal-02509620, HAL.
    14. Jan K. Brueckner, 2003. "Strategic Interaction Among Governments: An Overview of Empirical Studies," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(2), pages 175-188, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beata Sadowska & Magdalena Wójcik-Jurkiewicz & Grzegorz Zimon & Adam Lulek & Nina Stępnicka & Robert Walasek, 2023. "The Business Model in Energy Sector Reporting—A Case Study from Poland: A Pilot Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk, 2021. "Prosumers’ Needs Satisfied Due to Cooperation with Offerors in the Context of Attitudes toward Such Cooperation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Marzena Czarnecka & Katarzyna Chudy–Laskowska & Grzegorz Kinelski & Grzegorz Lew & Beata Sadowska & Magdalena Wójcik-Jurkiewicz & Borys Budka, 2022. "Grants and Funding for the Processes of Decarbonization in the Scope of Sustainability Development—The Case from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Maciej Ciołek & Izabela Emerling & Katarzyna Olejko & Beata Sadowska & Magdalena Wójcik-Jurkiewicz, 2022. "Assumptions of the Energy Policy of the Country versus Investment Outlays Related to the Purchase of Alternative Fuels: Poland as a Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Joanna Toborek-Mazur & Magdalena Wójcik-Jurkiewicz, 2022. "Multi-Energy Concern as an Example of the Implementation of Agenda 2030: Poland as a Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Maciej Sołtysik & Mariusz Kozakiewicz & Jakub Jasiński, 2022. "Improvement of Operating Efficiency of Energy Cooperatives with the Use of “Crypto-Coin Mining”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Maciej Sołtysik & Karolina Mucha-Kuś & Jacek Kamiński, 2022. "The New Model of Energy Cluster Management and Functioning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mierzejewska Wioletta, 2023. "Does coopetition pay off? Benefits of intra-organizational coopetition within business groups," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 59(2), pages 150-167, June.
    2. Frédéric Le Roy & Sea Matilda Bez & Johanna Gast, 2021. "Unpacking the management of Oligo-coopetition strategies in the absence of a moderating third party," Post-Print hal-03349671, HAL.
    3. Martin Schnitzer & Maximilian Seidl & Philipp Schlemmer & Mike Peters, 2018. "Analyzing the Coopetition between Tourism and Leisure Suppliers—A Case Study of the Leisure Card Tirol," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Yadav, Neetu & Kumar, Roopesh & Malik, Ashish, 2022. "Global developments in coopetition research: A bibliometric analysis of research articles published between 2010 and 2020," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 495-508.
    5. Ming-Chao Wang & Ja-Shen Chen, 2022. "Driving coopetition strategy to service innovation: the moderating role of coopetition recognition," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1471-1501, July.
    6. Maciej Sołtysik & Karolina Mucha-Kuś & Jacek Kamiński, 2022. "The New Model of Energy Cluster Management and Functioning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Patrycja Klimas & Ali Ashraf Ahmadian & Morteza Soltani & Meisam Shahbazi & Ali Hamidizadeh, 2023. "Coopetition, Where Do You Come From? Identification, Categorization, and Configuration of Theoretical Roots of Coopetition," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    8. Nicolas Scelles & Jean-François Mignot & Benjamin Cabaud & Aurélien François, 2018. "Temporary organizational forms and coopetition in cycling," Post-Print hal-02366610, HAL.
    9. Le Roy, Frédéric & Robert, Frank & Hamouti, Rizlane, 2022. "Vertical vs horizontal coopetition and the market performance of product innovation: An empirical study of the video game industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    10. Xiaotian Yang, 2022. "Coopetition for innovation in R&D consortia: Moderating roles of size disparity and formal interaction," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 79-102, March.
    11. Jakub Jasiński & Mariusz Kozakiewicz & Maciej Sołtysik, 2021. "The Effectiveness of Energy Cooperatives Operating on the Capacity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Crick, James M. & Crick, Dave, 2021. "The dark-side of coopetition: Influences on the paradoxical forces of cooperativeness and competitiveness across product-market strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 226-240.
    13. Czakon, Wojciech & Niemand, Thomas & Gast, Johanna & Kraus, Sascha & Frühstück, Lisa, 2020. "Designing coopetition for radical innovation: An experimental study of managers' preferences for developing self-driving electric cars," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Alshareef, Leena & Dietlmeier, Simon Frederic & Florian, Urmetzer, 2024. "Coopetition For The Greater Good. Exploratory study of coopetition management mechanisms in the pharmaceutical industry," MPRA Paper 120645, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Corbo, Leonardo & Kraus, Sascha & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano M., 2023. "Coopetition and innovation: A review and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Wojciech Czakon & Mariusz Rogalski, 2014. "Coopetition typology revisited - a behavioural approach," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 28-46.
    17. Youngwook Ko & Yanghon Chung & Hangyeol Seo, 2020. "Coopetition for Sustainable Competitiveness: R&D Collaboration in Perspective of Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Anne-Sophie Fernandez & Frédéric Le Roy, 2016. "Why firms implement Coopetitive-Project Teams?," Post-Print hal-02101071, HAL.
    19. Anna Bartkowiak & Piotr Bartkowiak & Grzegorz Kinelski, 2022. "Efficiency of Shaping the Value Chain in the Area of the Use of Raw Materials in Agro-Biorefinery in Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Jóna, György, 2017. "Versenytársak együttműködésének hatása a regionális gazdasági fejlődésre [Impacts of rivals cooperation on regional economic development]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 54-73.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7113-:d:669673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.