IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i20p6648-d656244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parametric Study of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery with Variation in Cold Temperature and Heat Source Temperature

Author

Listed:
  • Young-Min Kim

    (Research Division of Environmental and Energy Systems, Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials, 156 Gajeongbuk-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34104, Korea)

  • Young-Duk Lee

    (Department of Energy Technology, Korea Institute of Energy Technology (KENTECH), 200 Hyuksin-ro, Naju 58330, Korea)

  • Kook-Young Ahn

    (Research Division of Environmental and Energy Systems, Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials, 156 Gajeongbuk-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34104, Korea)

Abstract

The supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO 2 ) power cycle is a promising development for waste heat recovery (WHR) due to its high efficiency despite its simplicity and compactness compared with a steam bottoming cycle. A simple recuperated S-CO 2 power cycle cannot fully utilize the waste heat due to the trade-off between the heat recovery and thermal efficiency of the cycle. A split cycle in which the working fluid is preheated by the recuperator and the heat source separately can be used to maximize the power output from a given waste heat source. In this study, the operating conditions of split S-CO 2 power cycles for waste heat recovery from a gas turbine and an engine were studied to accommodate the temperature variation of the heat sink and the waste heat source. The results show that it is vital to increase the low pressure of the cycle along with a corresponding increase in the cooling temperature to maintain the low-compression work near the critical point. The net power decreases by 6 to 9% for every 5 °C rise in the cooling temperature from 20 to 50 °C due to the decrease in heat recovery and thermal efficiency of the cycle. The effect of the heat-source temperature on the optimal low-pressure side was negligible, and the optimal high pressure of the cycle increased with an increase in the heat-source temperature. As the heat-source temperature increased in steps of 50 °C from 300 to 400 °C, the system efficiency increased by approximately 2% (absolute efficiency), and the net power significantly increased by 30 to 40%.

Suggested Citation

  • Young-Min Kim & Young-Duk Lee & Kook-Young Ahn, 2021. "Parametric Study of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery with Variation in Cold Temperature and Heat Source Temperature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6648-:d:656244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Chuang & Yan, Xiao-jiang & Wang, Shun-sen & Bai, Kun-lun & Di, Juan & Cheng, Shang-fang & Li, Jun, 2016. "System optimisation and performance analysis of CO2 transcritical power cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 391-400.
    2. Kim, Young Min & Shin, Dong Gil & Kim, Chang Gi & Cho, Gyu Baek, 2016. "Single-loop organic Rankine cycles for engine waste heat recovery using both low- and high-temperature heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 482-494.
    3. Kim, Young Min & Sohn, Jeong Lak & Yoon, Eui Soo, 2017. "Supercritical CO2 Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery from gas turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 893-905.
    4. Kim, Sunjin & Cho, Yeonjoo & Kim, Min Soo & Kim, Minsung, 2018. "Characteristics and optimization of supercritical CO2 recompression power cycle and the influence of pinch point temperature difference of recuperators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1216-1226.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miroslav Variny, 2022. "Comment on Rogalev et al. Structural and Parametric Optimization of S-CO 2 Thermal Power Plants with a Pulverized Coal-Fired Boiler Operating in Russia. Energies 2021, 14 , 7136," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-5, February.
    2. Kun-Hsien Lu & Hsiao-Wei D. Chiang & Pei-Jen Wang, 2022. "Sensitivity Analysis of Transcritical CO 2 Cycle Performance Regarding Isentropic Efficiencies of Turbomachinery for Low Temperature Heat Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Liu, Peng & Shi, Lingfeng & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Optimization of CO2 Transcritical Power Cycle (CTPC) for engine waste heat recovery based on split concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Cao, Yue & Rattner, Alexander S. & Dai, Yiping, 2018. "Thermoeconomic analysis of a gas turbine and cascaded CO2 combined cycle using thermal oil as an intermediate heat-transfer fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1253-1268.
    3. Giovanni Manente & Mário Costa, 2020. "On the Conceptual Design of Novel Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    4. Li, Bo & Wang, Shun-sen, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a hybrid cascade supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    5. Lingfeng Shi & Gequn Shu & Hua Tian & Guangdai Huang & Liwen Chang & Tianyu Chen & Xiaoya Li, 2017. "Ideal Point Design and Operation of CO 2 -Based Transcritical Rankine Cycle (CTRC) System Based on High Utilization of Engine’s Waste Heats," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Zhang, Yifan & Wang, Yuan & Zhao, Yuxin, 2024. "A new thermodynamic modeling method for Brayton cycle schemes based on heat flux of the heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    7. Jiménez-Arreola, Manuel & Wieland, Christoph & Romagnoli, Alessandro, 2019. "Direct vs indirect evaporation in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems: A comparison of the dynamic behavior for waste heat recovery of engine exhaust," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 439-452.
    8. Alipour, Mehran & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Asadi, Mostafa, 2023. "Investigation of energy, exergy, and economy of co-generation system of solar electricity and cooling using linear parabolic collector for a data center," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    9. Liu, Jian & Xu, Yantao & Zhang, Yaning & Shuai, Yong & Li, Bingxi, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization of low temperature cooling water organic Rankine cycle using dual pinch point temperature difference technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    10. Wang, Shengpeng & Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Yao, Mingyu & Peng, Botao & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Thermohydrodynamic analysis of the vertical gas wall and reheat gas wall in a 300 MW supercritical CO2 boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    11. Gao, Lei & Cao, Tao & Hwang, Yunho & Radermacher, Reinhard, 2022. "Robustness analysis in supercritical CO2 power generation system configuration optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    12. Kun-Hsien Lu & Hsiao-Wei D. Chiang & Pei-Jen Wang, 2022. "Sensitivity Analysis of Transcritical CO 2 Cycle Performance Regarding Isentropic Efficiencies of Turbomachinery for Low Temperature Heat Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Haoyuan Ma & Zhan Liu, 2022. "An Engine Exhaust Utilization System by Combining CO 2 Brayton Cycle and Transcritical Organic Rankine Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Yang, Fubin & Cho, Heejin & Zhang, Hongguang & Zhang, Jian, 2017. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for CNG engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1100-1118.
    15. Kim, Young Min & Sohn, Jeong Lak & Yoon, Eui Soo, 2017. "Supercritical CO2 Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery from gas turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 893-905.
    16. Davide Di Battista & Roberto Cipollone, 2023. "Waste Energy Recovery and Valorization in Internal Combustion Engines for Transportation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-28, April.
    17. Jin, Qinglong & Xia, Shaojun & Chen, Lingen, 2023. "A modified recompression S–CO2 Brayton cycle and its thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    18. Wang, Yuan & Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Yu, Jianting & Zhang, Chaoli & Wang, Zi, 2023. "Comparative exergoeconomic analysis of atmosphere and pressurized CLC power plants coupled with supercritical CO2 cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    19. Wang, Xuan & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Liu, Peng & Jing, Dongzhan & Li, Xiaoya, 2018. "The effects of design parameters on the dynamic behavior of organic ranking cycle for the engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 440-450.
    20. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6648-:d:656244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.