IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v240y2022ics0360544221029893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective optimization of low temperature cooling water organic Rankine cycle using dual pinch point temperature difference technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Jian
  • Xu, Yantao
  • Zhang, Yaning
  • Shuai, Yong
  • Li, Bingxi

Abstract

The performances of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems are significantly varied by the heat source temperature and cold source temperature which are correlated and can be well indexed by dual pinch point temperature difference (PPTD). In this study, multi-objective optimization of net output power, total thermal conductance and expander size parameter of a low temperature cooling water ORC system using thirty-eight working fluids with different PPTDs was investigated and presented. The results show that the PPTD in evaporator is more sensitive to the net output power, total thermal conductance and expander size parameter than the PPTD in condenser. The alkane dry working fluid decane exhibits the best overall performance with net output power of 15.8 kW, total thermal conductance of 41 kW/K and expander size parameter of 0.101 mm, followed by nonane and carbon-11. For the low temperature cooling water ORC system with a heat source temperature of 100 °C, the optimal PPTD in evaporator is in the range of 5–7 °C (the optimal values for most working fluids are 5 °C), and the optimal PPTD in condenser is in the range of 6–9 °C (the optimal values for most working fluids are 6 °C).

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Jian & Xu, Yantao & Zhang, Yaning & Shuai, Yong & Li, Bingxi, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization of low temperature cooling water organic Rankine cycle using dual pinch point temperature difference technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:240:y:2022:i:c:s0360544221029893
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221029893
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin, Yunli & Gao, Naiping & Wang, Tiantian, 2020. "Influence of heat exchanger pinch point on the control strategy of Organic Rankine cycle (ORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    2. Li, You-Rong & Du, Mei-Tang & Wu, Chun-Mei & Wu, Shuang-Ying & Liu, Chao & Xu, Jin-Liang, 2014. "Economical evaluation and optimization of subcritical organic Rankine cycle based on temperature matching analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 238-247.
    3. Feng, Yongqiang & Zhang, Yaning & Li, Bingxi & Yang, Jinfu & Shi, Yang, 2015. "Sensitivity analysis and thermoeconomic comparison of ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 664-677.
    4. Wang, Jiangfeng & Yan, Zhequan & Wang, Man & Ma, Shaolin & Dai, Yiping, 2013. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of an (organic Rankine cycle) ORC using low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 356-365.
    5. Nami, Hossein & Ertesvåg, Ivar S. & Agromayor, Roberto & Riboldi, Luca & Nord, Lars O., 2018. "Gas turbine exhaust gas heat recovery by organic Rankine cycles (ORC) for offshore combined heat and power applications - Energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1060-1071.
    6. Kim, Sunjin & Cho, Yeonjoo & Kim, Min Soo & Kim, Minsung, 2018. "Characteristics and optimization of supercritical CO2 recompression power cycle and the influence of pinch point temperature difference of recuperators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1216-1226.
    7. Hamsani, Muhammad Nurheilmi & Walmsley, Timothy Gordon & Liew, Peng Yen & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah, 2018. "Combined Pinch and exergy numerical analysis for low temperature heat exchanger network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 100-112.
    8. Pereira, João S. & Ribeiro, José B. & Mendes, Ricardo & Vaz, Gilberto C. & André, Jorge C., 2018. "ORC based micro-cogeneration systems for residential application – A state of the art review and current challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 728-743.
    9. Li, Jian & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Yang, Fubin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Thermo-economic analyses and evaluations of small-scale dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle system using pure fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    10. Liu, Peng & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua, 2019. "How to approach optimal practical Organic Rankine cycle (OP-ORC) by configuration modification for diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 543-552.
    11. Liu, Zhaoyong & Zhao, Li & Zhao, Xuezheng & Li, Hailong, 2012. "The occurrence of pinch point and its effects on the performance of high temperature heat pump," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 869-875.
    12. Altun, A.F. & Kilic, M., 2020. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of a geothermal ORC power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 261-274.
    13. Sarkar, Jahar, 2018. "Generalized pinch point design method of subcritical-supercritical organic Rankine cycle for maximum heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 141-150.
    14. Li, You-Rong & Wang, Jian-Ning & Du, Mei-Tang, 2012. "Influence of coupled pinch point temperature difference and evaporation temperature on performance of organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 503-509.
    15. Feng, Yong-qiang & Hung, Tzu-Chen & Su, Ting-Ying & Wang, Shuang & Wang, Qian & Yang, Shih-Cheng & Lin, Jaw-Ren & Lin, Chih-Hung, 2017. "Experimental investigation of a R245fa-based organic Rankine cycle adapting two operation strategies: Stand alone and grid connect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1239-1253.
    16. Lion, Simone & Taccani, Rodolfo & Vlaskos, Ioannis & Scrocco, Pietro & Vouvakos, Xenakis & Kaiktsis, Lambros, 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis of waste heat recovery using Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for a two-stroke low speed marine Diesel engine in IMO Tier II and Tier III operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 48-60.
    17. Wang, Jiansheng & Diao, Mengzhen & Yue, Kaihong, 2017. "Optimization on pinch point temperature difference of ORC system based on AHP-Entropy method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 97-107.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Yi-Fan & Li, Ming-Jia & Ren, Xiao & Duan, Xin-Yue & Wu, Chia-Jung & Xi, Huan & Feng, Yong-Qiang & Gong, Liang & Hung, Tzu-Chen, 2022. "Effect of heat source supplies on system behaviors of ORCs with different capacities: An experimental comparison between the 3 kW and 10 kW unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    2. Liu, Jian & Zhang, Yaning & Li, Hongye & Zhao, Wenke & Hung, Tzu-Chen & Li, Bingxi, 2023. "Experimental thermal performance comparison of the same ORC system operated in Harbin and Taipei," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Liu, Peng & Shi, Lingfeng & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Optimization of CO2 Transcritical Power Cycle (CTPC) for engine waste heat recovery based on split concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Jin, Yunli & Gao, Naiping & Wang, Tiantian, 2020. "Influence of heat exchanger pinch point on the control strategy of Organic Rankine cycle (ORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    3. Alklaibi, A.M. & Lior, N., 2021. "Waste heat utilization from internal combustion engines for power augmentation and refrigeration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Zhang, Tao & Ma, Junhua & Zhou, Yanglin & Wang, Yongzhen & Chen, Qifang & Li, Xiaoping & Liu, Liuchen, 2021. "Thermo-economic analysis and optimization of ICE-ORC systems based on a splitter regulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    6. Liu, Liuchen & Zhu, Tong & Wang, Tiantian & Gao, Naiping, 2019. "Experimental investigation on the effect of working fluid charge in a small-scale Organic Rankine Cycle under off-design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 664-677.
    7. Zhang, Jianan & Qin, Kan & Li, Daijin & Luo, Kai & Dang, Jianjun, 2020. "Potential of Organic Rankine Cycles for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    9. Carraro, Gianluca & Bori, Viola & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Toniato, Giuseppe & Danieli, Piero, 2020. "Experimental investigation of an innovative biomass-fired micro-ORC system for cogeneration applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1226-1243.
    10. Yang, Fubin & Cho, Heejin & Zhang, Hongguang & Zhang, Jian, 2017. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for CNG engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1100-1118.
    11. Gürgen, Samet & Altın, İsmail, 2022. "Novel decision-making strategy for working fluid selection in Organic Rankine Cycle: A case study for waste heat recovery of a marine diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    12. Yi, Zhitong & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Chen, Ying, 2017. "Mathematical modelling and optimization of a liquid separation condenser-based organic Rankine cycle used in waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 916-934.
    13. Wang, Jiansheng & Diao, Mengzhen & Yue, Kaihong, 2017. "Optimization on pinch point temperature difference of ORC system based on AHP-Entropy method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 97-107.
    14. Tian, Zhen & Gan, Wanlong & Qi, Zhixin & Tian, Molin & Gao, Wenzhong, 2022. "Experimental study of organic Rankine cycle with three-fluid recuperator for cryogenic cold energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    15. Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Song, Songsong & Bei, Chen & Wang, Hongjin & Wang, Enhua, 2015. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of an organic Rankine cycle for exhaust waste heat recovery of a diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2208-2228.
    16. Jin, Yunli & Gao, Naiping & Zhu, Tong, 2022. "Effect of resistive load characteristics on the performance of Organic Rankine cycle (ORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    17. Zhu, Sipeng & Deng, Kangyao & Qu, Shuan, 2013. "Energy and exergy analyses of a bottoming Rankine cycle for engine exhaust heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 448-457.
    18. Li, Bo & Wang, Shun-sen, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a hybrid cascade supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    19. Zhang, Cheng & Liu, Chao & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Li, Qibin & Wang, Shukun, 2019. "Energetic, exergetic, economic and environmental (4E) analysis and multi-factor evaluation method of low GWP fluids in trans-critical organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 332-345.
    20. Shuozhuo Hu & Zhen Yang & Jian Li & Yuanyuan Duan, 2021. "A Review of Multi-Objective Optimization in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-36, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:240:y:2022:i:c:s0360544221029893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.