IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i19p6297-d648959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Supervised Learning Models in Predicting Greenhouse Energy Demand and Production for Intelligent and Sustainable Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Laila Ouazzani Chahidi

    (SIGER, Intelligent Systems, Georesources and Renewable Energies Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Fez, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, P.O. Box 2202, Fez 30050, Morocco)

  • Marco Fossa

    (DIME, Mechanical Energy, Management and Transportation Engineering Department, University of Genoa, Via Opera Pia 15a, 116145 Genova, Italy)

  • Antonella Priarone

    (DIME, Mechanical Energy, Management and Transportation Engineering Department, University of Genoa, Via Opera Pia 15a, 116145 Genova, Italy)

  • Abdellah Mechaqrane

    (SIGER, Intelligent Systems, Georesources and Renewable Energies Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Fez, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, P.O. Box 2202, Fez 30050, Morocco)

Abstract

Plants need a specific environment to grow and reproduce in fine fettle. Nevertheless, climatic conditions are not stable and can impact their well-being and, consequently, harvest quality. Thus, greenhouse cultivation is one of the suitable agricultural techniques for creating and controlling the inside microclimate to be adequate for plant growth. The relevance of greenhouse control is widely recognized. The prediction of greenhouse variables using artificial intelligence methods is of great interest for intelligent control and the potential reduction in energetic and financial losses. However, the studies carried out in this context are still more or less limited and several machine learning methods have not been sufficiently exploited. The aim of this study is to predict the air conditioning electrical consumption and photovoltaic module electrical production at the smart Agro-Manufacturing Laboratory (SamLab) greenhouse, located in Albenga, north-western Italy. Different supervised machine learning methods were compared, namely, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Boosting trees. We evaluated the performance of the models based on three statistical indicators: the coefficient of correlation (R), the normalized root mean square error (nRMSE) and the normalized mean absolute error (nMAE). The results show good agreement between the measured and predicted values for all models, with a correlation coefficient R > 0.9, considering the validation set. The good performance of the models affirms the importance of this approach and that it can be used to further improve greenhouse efficiency through its intelligent control.

Suggested Citation

  • Laila Ouazzani Chahidi & Marco Fossa & Antonella Priarone & Abdellah Mechaqrane, 2021. "Evaluation of Supervised Learning Models in Predicting Greenhouse Energy Demand and Production for Intelligent and Sustainable Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6297-:d:648959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6297/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6297/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ouazzani Chahidi, Laila & Fossa, Marco & Priarone, Antonella & Mechaqrane, Abdellah, 2021. "Energy saving strategies in sustainable greenhouse cultivation in the mediterranean climate – A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    2. Despotovic, Milan & Nedic, Vladimir & Despotovic, Danijela & Cvetanovic, Slobodan, 2016. "Evaluation of empirical models for predicting monthly mean horizontal diffuse solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 246-260.
    3. Pahlavan, Reza & Omid, Mahmoud & Akram, Asadollah, 2012. "Energy input–output analysis and application of artificial neural networks for predicting greenhouse basil production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 171-176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kieu Anh Nguyen & Walter Chen & Bor-Shiun Lin & Uma Seeboonruang, 2020. "Using Machine Learning-Based Algorithms to Analyze Erosion Rates of a Watershed in Northern Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Jamil, Basharat & Akhtar, Naiem, 2017. "Comparison of empirical models to estimate monthly mean diffuse solar radiation from measured data: Case study for humid-subtropical climatic region of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1326-1342.
    3. Vlontzos, G. & Pardalos, P.M., 2017. "Assess and prognosticate green house gas emissions from agricultural production of EU countries, by implementing, DEA Window analysis and artificial neural networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 155-162.
    4. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    5. Feng, Lan & Lin, Aiwen & Wang, Lunche & Qin, Wenmin & Gong, Wei, 2018. "Evaluation of sunshine-based models for predicting diffuse solar radiation in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 168-182.
    6. Luo, Laipeng & Zhang, Zhiyi & Li, Chong & Nishu, & He, Fang & Zhang, Xingguang & Cai, Junmeng, 2021. "Insight into master plots method for kinetic analysis of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    7. Park, Jinkyu & Oh, Jungmo, 2023. "A machine learning based predictive maintenance algorithm for ship generator engines using engine simulations and collected ship data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    8. Yongqiang Zhang & Hao Sun & Maosheng Ge & Hang Zhao & Yifan Hu & Changyue Cui & Zhibin Wu, 2023. "Difference in Energy Input and Output in Agricultural Production under Surface Irrigation and Water-Saving Irrigation: A Case Study of Kiwi Fruit in Shaanxi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Rafiee, Shahin & Omid, Mahmoud & Yousefi, Marziye & Movahedi, Mehran, 2013. "Modeling of energy consumption and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in wheat production in Esfahan province of Iran using artificial neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 333-338.
    10. Hassan, Gasser E. & Youssef, M. Elsayed & Mohamed, Zahraa E. & Ali, Mohamed A. & Hanafy, Ahmed A., 2016. "New Temperature-based Models for Predicting Global Solar Radiation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 437-450.
    11. Qin, Wenmin & Wang, Lunche & Lin, Aiwen & Zhang, Ming & Xia, Xiangao & Hu, Bo & Niu, Zigeng, 2018. "Comparison of deterministic and data-driven models for solar radiation estimation in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 579-594.
    12. Wang, Lunche & Lu, Yunbo & Zou, Ling & Feng, Lan & Wei, Jing & Qin, Wenmin & Niu, Zigeng, 2019. "Prediction of diffuse solar radiation based on multiple variables in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 151-216.
    13. Wang, Xiaozhong & Liu, Bin & Wu, Gang & Sun, Yixiang & Guo, Xisheng & Jin, Zhenghui & Xu, Weining & Zhao, Yongzhi & Zhang, Fusuo & Zou, Chunqin & Chen, Xinping, 2018. "Environmental costs and mitigation potential in plastic-greenhouse pepper production system in China: A life cycle assessment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 186-194.
    14. Uk-Hyeon Yeo & Sang-Yeon Lee & Se-Jun Park & Jun-Gyu Kim & Young-Bae Choi & Rack-Woo Kim & Jong Hwa Shin & In-Bok Lee, 2022. "Rooftop Greenhouse: (1) Design and Validation of a BES Model for a Plastic-Covered Greenhouse Considering the Tomato Crop Model and Natural Ventilation Characteristics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, June.
    15. Yang, Liu & Cao, Qimeng & Yu, Ying & Liu, Yan, 2020. "Comparison of daily diffuse radiation models in regions of China without solar radiation measurement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Wiktor Olchowik & Jędrzej Gajek & Andrzej Michalski, 2023. "The Use of Evolutionary Algorithms in the Modelling of Diffuse Radiation in Terms of Simulating the Energy Efficiency of Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-32, March.
    17. Xiaobo Xue Romeiko & Zhijian Guo & Yulei Pang & Eun Kyung Lee & Xuesong Zhang, 2020. "Comparing Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Spatially Explicit Life Cycle Global Warming and Eutrophication Impacts from Corn Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Sotiropoulou, Kalliopi F. & Vavatsikos, Athanasios P. & Botsaris, Pantelis N., 2024. "A hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE II onshore wind farms multicriteria suitability analysis using kNN and SVM regression models in northeastern Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    19. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Ma, Xin & Bai, Hua, 2019. "Evaluation and development of empirical models for estimating daily and monthly mean daily diffuse horizontal solar radiation for different climatic regions of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 168-186.
    20. Yingbo Pang & Iftikhar Azim & Momina Rauf & Muhammad Farjad Iqbal & Xinguang Ge & Muhammad Ashraf & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rahman Tariq & Anne W. M. Ng, 2022. "Prediction of Bidirectional Shear Strength of Rectangular RC Columns Subjected to Multidirectional Earthquake Actions for Collapse Prevention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6297-:d:648959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.