IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i18p5901-d637723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Digitalized Design Risk Analysis Tool with Machine-Learning Algorithm for EPC Contractor’s Technical Specifications Assessment on Bidding

Author

Listed:
  • Min-Ji Park

    (Graduate Institute of Ferrous and Energy Materials Technology, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), 77 Cheongam-Ro, Nam-Ku, Pohang 37673, Korea)

  • Eul-Bum Lee

    (Graduate Institute of Ferrous and Energy Materials Technology, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), 77 Cheongam-Ro, Nam-Ku, Pohang 37673, Korea
    Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), 77 Cheongam-Ro, Nam-Ku, Pohang 37673, Korea)

  • Seung-Yeab Lee

    (Graduate Institute of Ferrous and Energy Materials Technology, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), 77 Cheongam-Ro, Nam-Ku, Pohang 37673, Korea)

  • Jong-Hyun Kim

    (WISEiTECH Co., Pangyo Inovalley, 253 Pangyo-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13486, Korea)

Abstract

Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) projects span the entire cycle of industrial plants, from bidding to engineering, construction, and start-up operation and maintenance. Most EPC contractors do not have systematic decision-making tools when bidding for the project; therefore, they rely on manual analysis and experience in evaluating the bidding contract documents, including technical specifications. Oftentimes, they miss or underestimate the presence of technical risk clauses or risk severity, potentially create with a low bid price and tight construction schedule, and eventually experience severe cost overrun or/and completion delays. Through this study, two digital modules, Technical Risk Extraction and Design Parameter Extraction, were developed to extract and analyze risks in the project’s technical specifications based on machine learning and AI algorithms. In the Technical Risk Extraction module, technical risk keywords in the bidding technical specifications are collected, lexiconized, and then extracted through phrase matcher technology, a machine learning natural language processing technique. The Design Parameter Extraction module compares the collected engineering standards’ so-called standard design parameters and the plant owner’s technical requirements on the bid so that a contractor’s engineers can detect the difference between them and negotiate them. As described above, through the two modules, the risk clauses of the technical specifications of the project are extracted, and the risks are detected and reconsidered in the bidding or execution of the project, thereby minimizing project risk and providing a theoretical foundation and system for contractors. As a result of the pilot test performed to verify the performance and validity of the two modules, the design risk extraction accuracy of the system module has a relative advantage of 50 percent or more, compared to the risk extraction accuracy of manual evaluation by engineers. In addition, the speed of the automatic extraction and analysis of the system modules are 80 times faster than the engineer’s manual analysis time, thereby minimizing project loss due to errors or omissions due to design risk analysis during the project bidding period with a set deadline.

Suggested Citation

  • Min-Ji Park & Eul-Bum Lee & Seung-Yeab Lee & Jong-Hyun Kim, 2021. "A Digitalized Design Risk Analysis Tool with Machine-Learning Algorithm for EPC Contractor’s Technical Specifications Assessment on Bidding," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-31, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5901-:d:637723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5901/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5901/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byung-Yun Son & Eul-Bum Lee, 2019. "Using Text Mining to Estimate Schedule Delay Risk of 13 Offshore Oil and Gas EPC Case Studies During the Bidding Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Murat Gunduz & Mohammed Almuajebh, 2020. "Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Construction Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Daekyoung Yi & Eul-Bum Lee & Junyong Ahn, 2019. "Onshore Oil and Gas Design Schedule Management Process Through Time-Impact Simulations Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Su Jin Choi & So Won Choi & Jong Hyun Kim & Eul-Bum Lee, 2021. "AI and Text-Mining Applications for Analyzing Contractor’s Risk in Invitation to Bid (ITB) and Contracts for Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC) Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    5. Sung-O Kang & Eul-Bum Lee & Hum-Kyung Baek, 2019. "A Digitization and Conversion Tool for Imaged Drawings to Intelligent Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&ID)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Vasile Dumbravă & Vlăduț - Severian Iacob, 2013. "Using Probability – Impact Matrix in Analysis and Risk Assessment Projects," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 3(6), pages 1-7, December.
    7. Myung-Hun Kim & Eul-Bum Lee & Han-Suk Choi, 2018. "Detail Engineering Completion Rating Index System (DECRIS) for Optimal Initiation of Construction Works to Improve Contractors’ Schedule-Cost Performance for Offshore Oil and Gas EPC Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-31, July.
    8. Stetter, Chris & Piel, Jan-Hendrik & Hamann, Julian F.H. & Breitner, Michael H., 2020. "Competitive and risk-adequate auction bids for onshore wind projects in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. So-Won Choi & Eul-Bum Lee, 2022. "Contractor’s Risk Analysis of Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC) Contracts Using Ontological Semantic Model and Bi-Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-32, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. So-Won Choi & Eul-Bum Lee & Jong-Hyun Kim, 2021. "The Engineering Machine-Learning Automation Platform ( EMAP ): A Big-Data-Driven AI Tool for Contractors’ Sustainable Management Solutions for Plant Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-33, September.
    2. Su Jin Choi & So Won Choi & Jong Hyun Kim & Eul-Bum Lee, 2021. "AI and Text-Mining Applications for Analyzing Contractor’s Risk in Invitation to Bid (ITB) and Contracts for Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC) Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    3. So-Won Choi & Eul-Bum Lee, 2022. "Contractor’s Risk Analysis of Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC) Contracts Using Ontological Semantic Model and Bi-Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-32, June.
    4. Carlos Araújo-Rey & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2021. "An Approach to the Analysis of Causes of Delays in Industrial Construction Projects through Planning and Statistical Computing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Ahsan Waqar & Idris Othman & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2023. "Challenges to the Implementation of BIM for the Risk Management of Oil and Gas Construction Projects: Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-28, May.
    6. Fanta Barry & Marie Sawadogo & Maïmouna Bologo (Traoré) & Igor W. K. Ouédraogo & Thomas Dogot, 2021. "Key Barriers to the Adoption of Biomass Gasification in Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Ahmed S. El Touny & Ahmed H. Ibrahim & Hossam H. Mohamed, 2021. "An Integrated Sustainable Construction Project’s Critical Success Factors (ISCSFs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Min Li & Tsung-Chih Hsiao & Chih-Cheng Chen, 2020. "Exploring the Factors of Cooperation between Artists and Technologists in Creating New Media Art Works: Based on AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Amri, Tariq Al & Otaibi, Naif Al & Marey-Perez, Manuel, 2023. "The Major Obstacles and Factors Facing Green Building in the KSA: A Background Study," OSF Preprints a352b, Center for Open Science.
    10. Athanasios Lamprou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2022. "Identification and Evaluation of Success Criteria and Critical Success Factors in Project Success," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(2), pages 237-253, June.
    11. del Río, Pablo & Kiefer, Christoph P., 2023. "Academic research on renewable electricity auctions: Taking stock and looking forward," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Byung-Yun Son & Eul-Bum Lee, 2019. "Using Text Mining to Estimate Schedule Delay Risk of 13 Offshore Oil and Gas EPC Case Studies During the Bidding Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Maedeh Motalebi & Emma Heffernan & Timothy McCarthy & Samin Marzban & Ali Rashidi, 2025. "Sustainability and Stakeholder Engagement in Building Information Modelling-Enabled Construction: A Review of Critical Success Factors in Design and Planning Phases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-38, January.
    14. Myung-Hun Kim & Eul-Bum Lee, 2019. "A Forecast Model for the Level of Engineering Maturity Impact on Contractor’s Procurement and Construction Costs for Offshore EPC Megaprojects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Stetter, Chris & Wielert, Henrik & Breitner, Michael H., 2022. "Hidden repowering potential of non-repowerable onshore wind sites in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Kazemi, Fatemeh & Hossein pour, Nazanin & Mahdizadeh, Hassan, 2022. "Sustainable low-input urban park design based on some decision-making methods," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    17. Marija Z. Ivanović & Đorđe Nedeljković & Zoran Stojadinović & Dejan Marinković & Nenad Ivanišević & Nevena Simić, 2022. "Detection and In-Depth Analysis of Causes of Delay in Construction Projects: Synergy between Machine Learning and Expert Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Myung-Hun Kim & Eul-Bum Lee & Han-Suk Choi, 2019. "A Forecast and Mitigation Model of Construction Performance by Assessing Detailed Engineering Maturity at Key Milestones for Offshore EPC Mega-Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Antonio C. C. Perrelli & Eduardo A. Sodré & André V. R. N. Silva & Caarem D. S. Studzinski & Vinícius F. Silva & Dalton F. G. Filho & Armando T. Neto & Alex A. B. Santos, 2024. "Optimizing Price Markup: The Impact of Power Purchase Agreements and Energy Production Uncertainty on the Economic Performance of Onshore and Offshore Wind Farms," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 211-219, September.
    20. Daekyoung Yi & Eul-Bum Lee & Junyong Ahn, 2019. "Onshore Oil and Gas Design Schedule Management Process Through Time-Impact Simulations Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5901-:d:637723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.