IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i16p4875-d611521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermal Absorption Performance Evaluation of Water-Based Nanofluids (CNTs, Cu, and Al 2 O 3 ) for Solar Thermal Harvesting

Author

Listed:
  • Youngho Lee

    (Department of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeonghaean-ro 2, Tongyeong-si 53064, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea)

  • Hyomin Jeong

    (Department of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeonghaean-ro 2, Tongyeong-si 53064, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea)

  • Yonmo Sung

    (Department of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeonghaean-ro 2, Tongyeong-si 53064, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea)

Abstract

For solar thermal harvesting, an experimental study was performed on the thermal absorption performance of water-based carbon nanotubes (CNTs), Cu, and Al 2 O 3 nanofluids using a halogen lamp-based thermal radiation system. The effect of nanoparticle concentrations (0.01 wt.%, 0.1 wt.%, and 1 wt.%) on the nanofluid dispersion, stability, and thermal absorption characteristics was investigated, and a comparative analysis was performed for each type of nanofluid. All types of nanofluids increased the absorbance and electrical conductivity with increasing nanoparticle concentration, which contributed to improving the thermal absorption performance of nanofluids. The results showed that the thermal absorption performance was high in the order of carbon-based nanofluids (CNTs), metal-based nanofluids (Cu), and oxide-based nanofluids (Al 2 O 3 ). In CNTs nanofluids, the thermal absorption performance expressed the time reduction rate, which was 12.8%, 16.3%, and 16.4% at 0.01 wt.%, 0.1 wt.%, and 1 wt.% test cases, respectively. Therefore, the 0.1 wt.%-CNTs nanofluid is more economical and appropriate. However, in Al 2 O 3 nanofluids, the time reduction rate of the 1 wt.% nanofluid was significantly higher than that of the 0.01 wt.% and 0.1 wt.% nanofluids. In Cu nanofluids, unlike CNTs and Al 2 O 3 nanofluids, the time reduction rate constantly increased as the nanoparticle concentration increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Youngho Lee & Hyomin Jeong & Yonmo Sung, 2021. "Thermal Absorption Performance Evaluation of Water-Based Nanofluids (CNTs, Cu, and Al 2 O 3 ) for Solar Thermal Harvesting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:4875-:d:611521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/4875/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/4875/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rashidi, Saman & Akar, Shima & Bovand, Masoud & Ellahi, Rahmat, 2018. "Volume of fluid model to simulate the nanofluid flow and entropy generation in a single slope solar still," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 400-410.
    2. Joo Hee Lee & Seong Geon Hwang & Gwi Hyun Lee, 2019. "Efficiency Improvement of a Photovoltaic Thermal (PVT) System Using Nanofluids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Khanafer, Khalil & Vafai, Kambiz, 2018. "A review on the applications of nanofluids in solar energy field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 398-406.
    4. Kim, Hyeongmin & Ham, Jeonggyun & Park, Chasik & Cho, Honghyun, 2016. "Theoretical investigation of the efficiency of a U-tube solar collector using various nanofluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 497-507.
    5. Sarkar, Jahar, 2011. "A critical review on convective heat transfer correlations of nanofluids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 3271-3277, August.
    6. Mohammed H. Alsharif & Jeong Kim & Jin Hong Kim, 2018. "Opportunities and Challenges of Solar and Wind Energy in South Korea: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Tsogtbilegt Boldoo & Jeonggyun Ham & Honghyun Cho, 2020. "Comprehensive Experimental Study on the Thermophysical Characteristics of DI Water Based Co 0.5 Zn 0.5 Fe 2 O 4 Nanofluid for Solar Thermal Harvesting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Yousefi, Tooraj & Veysi, Farzad & Shojaeizadeh, Ehsan & Zinadini, Sirus, 2012. "An experimental investigation on the effect of Al2O3–H2O nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 293-298.
    9. Sheikholeslami, M. & Farshad, Seyyed Ali, 2021. "Investigation of solar collector system with turbulator considering hybrid nanoparticles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1128-1158.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tembhare, Saurabh P. & Barai, Divya P. & Bhanvase, Bharat A., 2022. "Performance evaluation of nanofluids in solar thermal and solar photovoltaic systems: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Purohit, Nilesh & Jakhar, Sanjeev & Gullo, Paride & Dasgupta, Mani Sankar, 2018. "Heat transfer and entropy generation analysis of alumina/water nanofluid in a flat plate PV/T collector under equal pumping power comparison criterion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 14-22.
    3. Lomascolo, Mauro & Colangelo, Gianpiero & Milanese, Marco & de Risi, Arturo, 2015. "Review of heat transfer in nanofluids: Conductive, convective and radiative experimental results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1182-1198.
    4. Mukhamad Faeshol Umam & Md. Hasanuzzaman & Nasrudin Abd Rahim, 2022. "Global Advancement of Nanofluid-Based Sheet and Tube Collectors for a Photovoltaic Thermal System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-37, August.
    5. Hooshmandzade, Niusha & Motevali, Ali & Reza Mousavi Seyedi, Seyed & Biparva, Pouria, 2021. "Influence of single and hybrid water-based nanofluids on performance of microgrid photovoltaic/thermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    6. Menon, Govind S. & Murali, S. & Elias, Jacob & Aniesrani Delfiya, D.S. & Alfiya, P.V. & Samuel, Manoj P., 2022. "Experimental investigations on unglazed photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) system using water and nanofluid cooling medium," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 986-996.
    7. Sheikh, Nadeem Ahmad & Ali, Farhad & Khan, Ilyas & Gohar, Madeha, 2018. "A theoretical study on the performance of a solar collector using CeO2 and Al2O3 water based nanofluids with inclined plate: Atangana–Baleanu fractional model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 135-142.
    8. Moucun Yang & Sa Wang & Yuezhao Zhu & Robert A. Taylor & M.A. Moghimi & Yinfeng Wang, 2020. "Thermal Stability and Performance Testing of Oil-based CuO Nanofluids for Solar Thermal Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Chopra, K. & Tyagi, V.V. & Pandey, A.K. & Sari, Ahmet, 2018. "Global advancement on experimental and thermal analysis of evacuated tube collector with and without heat pipe systems and possible applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 351-389.
    10. Ambreen, Tehmina & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2020. "Influence of particle size on the effective thermal conductivity of nanofluids: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    11. Tassaddiq, Asifa & Khan, I. & Nisar, K.S., 2020. "Heat transfer analysis in sodium alginate based nanofluid using MoS2 nanoparticles: Atangana–Baleanu fractional model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    12. Kaya, Hüseyin & Alkasem, Mohanad & Arslan, Kamil, 2020. "Effect of nanoparticle shape of Al2O3/Pure Water nanofluid on evacuated U-Tube solar collector efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 267-284.
    13. Gholipour, Shayan & Afrand, Masoud & Kalbasi, Rasool, 2020. "Improving the efficiency of vacuum tube collectors using new absorbent tubes arrangement: Introducing helical coil and spiral tube adsorbent tubes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 772-781.
    14. Mahbubul, I.M. & Khan, Mohammed Mumtaz A. & Ibrahim, Nasiru I. & Ali, Hafiz Muhammad & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Saidur, R., 2018. "Carbon nanotube nanofluid in enhancing the efficiency of evacuated tube solar collector," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 36-44.
    15. Daghigh, Roonak & Zandi, Pooya, 2019. "Improving the performance of heat pipe embedded evacuated tube collector with nanofluids and auxiliary gas system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 888-901.
    16. Seyed Reza Shamshirgaran & Hussain H. Al-Kayiem & Korada V. Sharma & Mostafa Ghasemi, 2020. "State of the Art of Techno-Economics of Nanofluid-Laden Flat-Plate Solar Collectors for Sustainable Accomplishment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-52, November.
    17. Hachicha, Ahmed Amine & Yousef, Bashria A.A. & Said, Zafar & Rodríguez, Ivette, 2019. "A review study on the modeling of high-temperature solar thermal collector systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 280-298.
    18. Al-Gebory, Layth & Mengüç, M. Pinar & Koşar, Ali & Şendur, Kürşat, 2018. "Effect of electrostatic stabilization on thermal radiation transfer in nanosuspensions: Photo-thermal energy conversion applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 625-640.
    19. Muhammad, Mahmud Jamil & Muhammad, Isa Adamu & Sidik, Nor Azwadi Che & Yazid, Muhammad Noor Afiq Witri Muhammad & Mamat, Rizalman & Najafi, G., 2016. "The use of nanofluids for enhancing the thermal performance of stationary solar collectors: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 226-236.
    20. Abu Shadate Faisal Mahamude & Wan Sharuzi Wan Harun & Kumaran Kadirgama & Devarajan Ramasamy & Kaniz Farhana & Khalid Saleh & Talal Yusaf, 2022. "Experimental Study on the Efficiency Improvement of Flat Plate Solar Collectors Using Hybrid Nanofluids Graphene/Waste Cotton," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-27, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:4875-:d:611521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.