IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i16p4788-d609725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Occupant-Centric Theory of Building Control Systems and Their User Interfaces

Author

Listed:
  • Ardeshir Mahdavi

    (Department of Building Physics and Building Ecology, TU Wien, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Vienna, Austria)

  • Helene Teufl

    (Department of Building Physics and Building Ecology, TU Wien, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Vienna, Austria)

  • Christiane Berger

    (Department of Building Physics and Building Ecology, TU Wien, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

This paper presents an occupant-centric theory of buildings’ indoor-environmental control systems and their user interfaces. Buildings typically can have multiple devices and systems to maintain indoor-environmental conditions within certain ranges in order to meet occupants’ health and comfort requirements. Therefore, it is important to understand what those ranges are exactly, who defines them, and for whom. Health and comfort sciences offer some broad directions concerning desirable indoor conditions. These are typically formulated in various codes, standards, and guidelines in terms of target values or the set points of control variables. However, preferable conditions may differ at different times and for different individuals. Another question concerns the agency responsible for maintaining the preferred conditions. In some settings, conditions may be centrally controlled via the buildings’ automation systems, whereas in other settings, occupants might have the possibility to control their immediate surroundings. Given these qualifications, the objective of the present inquiry can be stated more precisely. We outline a human-ecologically inspired theory pertaining to the occupants’ perception of and interaction with a building’s indoor-environmental control systems and their user interfaces. Specifically, we explore the operationalization potential of the proposed theory as a compact assessment protocol for the evaluation of buildings’ responsiveness to occupants’ preferences. Initial experiences with the derivative protocol are promising. Nonetheless, in order to be fully applicable in practice, certain challenges must be addressed. These specifically include the need for more robust procedures toward the translation of occupants’ subjective judgments into quantitative evaluation scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Ardeshir Mahdavi & Helene Teufl & Christiane Berger, 2021. "An Occupant-Centric Theory of Building Control Systems and Their User Interfaces," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:4788-:d:609725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/4788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/4788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Djongyang, Noël & Tchinda, René & Njomo, Donatien, 2010. "Thermal comfort: A review paper," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2626-2640, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura J. Elstub & Shimra J. Fine & Karl E. Zelik, 2021. "Exoskeletons and Exosuits Could Benefit from Mode-Switching Body Interfaces That Loosen/Tighten to Improve Thermal Comfort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Ribeiro, Thatiana Jessica da Silva & Mady, Carlos Eduardo Keutenedjian, 2022. "Comparison among exergy analysis methods applied to a human body thermal model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    3. Bruno Malet-Damour & Jean-Pierre Habas & Dimitri Bigot, 2023. "Is Loose-Fill Plastic Waste an Opportunity for Thermal Insulation in Cold and Humid Tropical Climates?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Djamila, Harimi, 2017. "Indoor thermal comfort predictions: Selected issues and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 569-580.
    5. Francesco Asdrubali & Cinzia Buratti & Franco Cotana & Giorgio Baldinelli & Michele Goretti & Elisa Moretti & Catia Baldassarri & Elisa Belloni & Francesco Bianchi & Antonella Rotili & Marco Vergoni &, 2013. "Evaluation of Green Buildings’ Overall Performance through in Situ Monitoring and Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Amir Faraji & Maria Rashidi & Fatemeh Rezaei & Payam Rahnamayiezekavat, 2023. "A Meta-Synthesis Review of Occupant Comfort Assessment in Buildings (2002–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-36, February.
    7. Feng, Yanxiao & Liu, Shichao & Wang, Julian & Yang, Jing & Jao, Ying-Ling & Wang, Nan, 2022. "Data-driven personal thermal comfort prediction: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Michael Short & Sergio Rodriguez & Richard Charlesworth & Tracey Crosbie & Nashwan Dawood, 2019. "Optimal Dispatch of Aggregated HVAC Units for Demand Response: An Industry 4.0 Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Van Craenendonck, Stijn & Lauriks, Leen & Vuye, Cedric & Kampen, Jarl, 2018. "A review of human thermal comfort experiments in controlled and semi-controlled environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3365-3378.
    10. Enescu, Diana, 2017. "A review of thermal comfort models and indicators for indoor environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1353-1379.
    11. Escandón, Rocío & Suárez, Rafael & Sendra, Juan José, 2019. "Field assessment of thermal comfort conditions and energy performance of social housing: The case of hot summers in the Mediterranean climate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 377-392.
    12. Azar, Elie & Nikolopoulou, Christina & Papadopoulos, Sokratis, 2016. "Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 926-937.
    13. Haider Latif & Samira Rahnama & Alessandro Maccarini & Goran Hultmark & Peter V. Nielsen & Alireza Afshari, 2022. "Precision Ventilation in an Open-Plan Office: A New Application of Active Chilled Beam (ACB) with a JetCone Feature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Omar al-Ani & Sanjoy Das & Hongyu Wu, 2023. "Imitation Learning with Deep Attentive Tabular Neural Networks for Environmental Prediction and Control in Smart Home," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Pilechiha, Peiman & Mahdavinejad, Mohammadjavad & Pour Rahimian, Farzad & Carnemolla, Phillippa & Seyedzadeh, Saleh, 2020. "Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    16. Yuan, Jihui & Huang, Pei & Chai, Jiale, 2022. "Development of a calibrated typical meteorological year weather file in system design of zero-energy building for performance improvements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    17. Verbeke, Stijn & Audenaert, Amaryllis, 2018. "Thermal inertia in buildings: A review of impacts across climate and building use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2300-2318.
    18. Hsiao-Chi Nieh & Shu-Fen Su, 2018. "Forced-Air Warming for Rewarming and Comfort Following Laparoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trail," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 27(5), pages 540-559, June.
    19. Hongyu Du & Fengqi Zhou & Wenbo Cai & Yongli Cai & Yanqing Xu, 2021. "Thermal and Humidity Effect of Urban Green Spaces with Different Shapes: A Case Study of Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-13, June.
    20. Giovanni Bianco & Stefano Bracco & Federico Delfino & Lorenzo Gambelli & Michela Robba & Mansueto Rossi, 2020. "A Building Energy Management System Based on an Equivalent Electric Circuit Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:4788-:d:609725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.