IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i23p7781-d1288171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power Generation with Renewable Energy and Advanced Supercritical CO 2 Thermodynamic Power Cycles: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyu Zhang

    (School of the Built Environment and Architecture, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK)

  • Yunting Ge

    (School of the Built Environment and Architecture, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK)

Abstract

Supercritical CO 2 (S-CO 2 ) thermodynamic power cycles have been considerably investigated in the applications of fossil fuel and nuclear power generation systems, considering their superior characteristics such as compactness, sustainability, cost-effectiveness, environmentally friendly working fluid and high thermal efficiency. They can be potentially integrated and applied with various renewable energy systems for low-carbon power generation, so extensive studies in these areas have also been conducted substantially. However, there is a shortage of reviews that specifically concentrate on the integrations of S-CO 2 with renewable energy, encompassing biomass, solar, geothermal and waste heat. It is thus necessary to provide an update and overview of the development of S-CO 2 renewable energy systems and identify technology and integration opportunities for different types of renewable resources. Correspondingly, this paper not only summarizes the advantages of CO 2 working fluid, design layouts of S-CO 2 cycles and classifications of renewable energies to be integrated but also reviews the recent research activities and studies carried out worldwide on advanced S-CO 2 power cycles with renewable energy. Moreover, the performance and development of various systems are well grouped and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyu Zhang & Yunting Ge, 2023. "Power Generation with Renewable Energy and Advanced Supercritical CO 2 Thermodynamic Power Cycles: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-32, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:23:p:7781-:d:1288171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7781/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7781/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Caccia & M. Tabandeh-Khorshid & G. Itskos & A. R. Strayer & A. S. Caldwell & S. Pidaparti & S. Singnisai & A. D. Rohskopf & A. M. Schroeder & D. Jarrahbashi & T. Kang & S. Sahoo & N. R. Kadasala & , 2018. "Ceramic–metal composites for heat exchangers in concentrated solar power plants," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7727), pages 406-409, October.
    2. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    3. Ge, Y.T. & Tassou, S.A. & Santosa, I. Dewa & Tsamos, K., 2015. "Design optimisation of CO2 gas cooler/condenser in a refrigeration system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 973-981.
    4. Iverson, Brian D. & Conboy, Thomas M. & Pasch, James J. & Kruizenga, Alan M., 2013. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 957-970.
    5. Liu, Qiang & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2013. "Performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles with selected hydrocarbon working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 123-132.
    6. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    7. Wang, Kun & Li, Ming-Jia & Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Peiwen & Liu, Zhan-Bin, 2018. "A systematic comparison of different S-CO2 Brayton cycle layouts based on multi-objective optimization for applications in solar power tower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 109-121.
    8. Zhang, Ruiyuan & Su, Wen & Lin, Xinxing & Zhou, Naijun & Zhao, Li, 2020. "Thermodynamic analysis and parametric optimization of a novel S–CO2 power cycle for the waste heat recovery of internal combustion engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    10. Ji-chao, Yang & Sobhani, Behrooz, 2021. "Integration of biomass gasification with a supercritical CO2 and Kalina cycles in a combined heating and power system: A thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    11. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Benito, Regano & Stein, Wes, 2015. "Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 348-365.
    12. Moradi, Ramin & Cioccolanti, Luca & Del Zotto, Luca & Renzi, Massimiliano, 2023. "Comparative sensitivity analysis of micro-scale gas turbine and supercritical CO2 systems with bottoming organic Rankine cycles fed by the biomass gasification for decentralized trigeneration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Ma, Yuegeng & Morozyuk, Tatiana & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2019. "Optimal integration of recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with main compression intercooling in solar power tower system based on exergoeconomic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1134-1154.
    3. Pan, Lisheng & Shi, Weixiu & Wei, Xiaolin & Li, Teng & Li, Bo, 2020. "Experimental verification of the self-condensing CO2 transcritical power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    5. Yu, Aofang & Xing, Lingli & Su, Wen & Liu, Pei, 2023. "State-of-the-art review on the CO2 combined power and cooling system: System configuration, modeling and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Paul Tafur-Escanta & Robert Valencia-Chapi & Ignacio López-Paniagua & Luis Coco-Enríquez & Javier Muñoz-Antón, 2021. "Supercritical CO 2 Binary Mixtures for Recompression Brayton s-CO 2 Power Cycles Coupled to Solar Thermal Energy Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, July.
    7. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & He, Ya-Ling & Xu, Jin-Liang, 2019. "A study of new method and comprehensive evaluation on the improved performance of solar power tower plant with the CO2-based mixture cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    8. Xu, Jinliang & Sun, Enhui & Li, Mingjia & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Bingguo, 2018. "Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 227-246.
    9. Fallah, M. & Mohammadi, Z. & Mahmoudi, S.M. Seyed, 2022. "Advanced exergy analysis of the combined S–CO2/ORC system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    10. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Klimenko, Alexander, 2020. "Feasibility of dry cooling in supercritical CO2 power cycle in concentrated solar power application: Review and a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Zhao, Yu & Chang, Zhiyuan & Zhao, Yuanyang & Yang, Qichao & Liu, Guangbin & Li, Liansheng, 2023. "Performance comparison of three supercritical CO2 solar thermal power systems with compressed fluid and molten salt energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    12. Wang, Di & Han, Xinrui & Li, Haoyu & Li, Xiaoli, 2023. "Dynamic simulation and parameter analysis of solar-coal hybrid power plant based on the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    13. Linares, José I. & Montes, María J. & Cantizano, Alexis & Sánchez, Consuelo, 2020. "A novel supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton power cycle for power tower concentrating solar plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    14. Gotelip, Thiago & Gampe, Uwe & Glos, Stefan, 2022. "Optimization strategies of different SCO2 architectures for gas turbine bottoming cycle applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    15. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2021. "Load matching and techno-economic analysis of CSP plant with S–CO2 Brayton cycle in CSP-PV-wind hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    16. Xingyan, Bian & Wang, Xuan & Wang, Rui & Cai, Jinwen & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn, 2022. "Optimal selection of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle layouts based on part-load performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    17. Tafur-Escanta, Paul & López-Paniagua, Ignacio & Muñoz-Antón, Javier, 2023. "Thermodynamics analysis of the supercritical CO2 binary mixtures for Brayton power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    18. Binotti, Marco & Astolfi, Marco & Campanari, Stefano & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Silva, Paolo, 2017. "Preliminary assessment of sCO2 cycles for power generation in CSP solar tower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1007-1017.
    19. Zhu, Han-Hui & Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis and comparison for different direct-heated supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated into a solar thermal power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 144-157.
    20. Sun, Lei & Liu, Tianyuan & Wang, Ding & Huang, Chengming & Xie, Yonghui, 2022. "Deep learning method based on graph neural network for performance prediction of supercritical CO2 power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:23:p:7781-:d:1288171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.