IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i13p3791-d581162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Model Calibration Method for Simulation Performance of a Public Hospital in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Paulo Fernandes da Silva

    (Instituto de Energia e Ambiente, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo CEP 05508-010, Brazil
    Centro de Análise, Planejamento e Desenvolvimento de Recursos Energéticos (CPLEN), Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo CEP 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Alberto Hernandez Neto

    (Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo CEP 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Ildo Luis Sauer

    (Instituto de Energia e Ambiente, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo CEP 05508-010, Brazil
    Centro de Análise, Planejamento e Desenvolvimento de Recursos Energéticos (CPLEN), Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo CEP 05508-010, Brazil)

Abstract

This work presents an extensive study on methodologies to calibrate electric energy consumption in buildings. A comparison between several calibration methodologies shows different approaches addressing the same issue, suggesting a lack of a unique methodology that is reproducible for every building. Additionally, no methodology fits the Brazilian public context, such as the predominance of Unitary Air Conditioning Systems (UACS) and buildings which have operated for more than 30 years. A new calibration methodology for performance simulation is proposed to deal with such features. The methodology is separated into two evidence-based steps according to the size of the Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems used to control buildings’ indoor environments: the first step is dedicated to calibrating medium- and large-sized HVAC systems, and the second step is dedicated to calibrating small-sized HVAC systems. University Hospital of University of São Paulo (UH-USP) is used as a test bed to implement the proposed methodology. Accuracy indicators show the efficiency of the methodology in terms of calibrating a simulation of the whole UH-USP building and Chilled Water Plant on a monthly basis in terms of accuracy and the time needed to perform the calibration. However, regarding simulation of UACS, the application of the methodology was inconclusive. This study leaves open the question of the trade-off between increasing model outcome accuracy and the strictness of accuracy indicators applied to UACS and poorly automated large-sized air conditioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Paulo Fernandes da Silva & Alberto Hernandez Neto & Ildo Luis Sauer, 2021. "Evaluation of Model Calibration Method for Simulation Performance of a Public Hospital in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:3791-:d:581162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3791/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3791/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaudhary, Gaurav & New, Joshua & Sanyal, Jibonananda & Im, Piljae & O’Neill, Zheng & Garg, Vishal, 2016. "Evaluation of “Autotune” calibration against manual calibration of building energy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 115-134.
    2. Ghisi, Enedir & Gosch, Samuel & Lamberts, Roberto, 2007. "Electricity end-uses in the residential sector of Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 4107-4120, August.
    3. Kim, Yang-Seon & Heidarinejad, Mohammad & Dahlhausen, Matthew & Srebric, Jelena, 2017. "Building energy model calibration with schedules derived from electricity use data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 997-1007.
    4. Li, Nan & Yang, Zheng & Becerik-Gerber, Burcin & Tang, Chao & Chen, Nanlin, 2015. "Why is the reliability of building simulation limited as a tool for evaluating energy conservation measures?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 196-205.
    5. Enrico Fabrizio & Valentina Monetti, 2015. "Methodologies and Advancements in the Calibration of Building Energy Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Nikolaos Kampelis & Georgios I. Papayiannis & Dionysia Kolokotsa & Georgios N. Galanis & Daniela Isidori & Cristina Cristalli & Athanasios N. Yannacopoulos, 2020. "An Integrated Energy Simulation Model for Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Seyedzadeh, Saleh & Pour Rahimian, Farzad & Oliver, Stephen & Rodriguez, Sergio & Glesk, Ivan, 2020. "Machine learning modelling for predicting non-domestic buildings energy performance: A model to support deep energy retrofit decision-making," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    8. Yang, Tao & Pan, Yiqun & Mao, Jiachen & Wang, Yonglong & Huang, Zhizhong, 2016. "An automated optimization method for calibrating building energy simulation models with measured data: Orientation and a case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1220-1231.
    9. Yang, Zheng & Becerik-Gerber, Burcin, 2015. "A model calibration framework for simultaneous multi-level building energy simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 415-431.
    10. Mustafaraj, Giorgio & Marini, Dashamir & Costa, Andrea & Keane, Marcus, 2014. "Model calibration for building energy efficiency simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 72-85.
    11. Deb, C. & Schlueter, A., 2021. "Review of data-driven energy modelling techniques for building retrofit," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Psillaki & Nikolaos Apostolopoulos & Ilias Makris & Panagiotis Liargovas & Sotiris Apostolopoulos & Panos Dimitrakopoulos & George Sklias, 2023. "Hospitals’ Energy Efficiency in the Perspective of Saving Resources and Providing Quality Services through Technological Options: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Violeta Motuzienė & Vilūnė Lapinskienė & Genrika Rynkun, 2024. "Optimizing Ventilation Systems for Sustainable Office Buildings: Long-Term Monitoring and Environmental Impact Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. York Castillo Santiago & Daiane Busanello & Alexandre F. Santos & Osvaldo J. Venturini & Leandro A. Sphaier, 2024. "The Impact of Air Renewal with Heat-Recovery Technologies on Energy Consumption for Different Types of Environments in Brazilian Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glasgo, Brock & Hendrickson, Chris & Azevedo, Inês Lima, 2017. "Assessing the value of information in residential building simulation: Comparing simulated and actual building loads at the circuit level," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 348-363.
    2. Germán Ramos Ruiz & Carlos Fernández Bandera, 2017. "Validation of Calibrated Energy Models: Common Errors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Glasgo, Brock & Khan, Nyla & Azevedo, Inês Lima, 2020. "Simulating a residential building stock to support regional efficiency policy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    4. Yang, Tao & Pan, Yiqun & Mao, Jiachen & Wang, Yonglong & Huang, Zhizhong, 2016. "An automated optimization method for calibrating building energy simulation models with measured data: Orientation and a case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1220-1231.
    5. Nutkiewicz, Alex & Yang, Zheng & Jain, Rishee K., 2018. "Data-driven Urban Energy Simulation (DUE-S): A framework for integrating engineering simulation and machine learning methods in a multi-scale urban energy modeling workflow," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1176-1189.
    6. Jeong, Kwangbok & Hong, Taehoon & Kim, Jimin & Cho, Kyuman, 2019. "Development of a multi-objective optimization model for determining the optimal CO2 emissions reduction strategies for a multi-family housing complex," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 118-131.
    7. Carlos Fernández Bandera & Germán Ramos Ruiz, 2017. "Towards a New Generation of Building Envelope Calibration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Ramos Ruiz, Germán & Fernández Bandera, Carlos & Gómez-Acebo Temes, Tomás & Sánchez-Ostiz Gutierrez, Ana, 2016. "Genetic algorithm for building envelope calibration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 691-705.
    9. Yuan, Jun & Nian, Victor & Su, Bin & Meng, Qun, 2017. "A simultaneous calibration and parameter ranking method for building energy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 657-666.
    10. Sun, Kaiyu & Hong, Tianzhen & Taylor-Lange, Sarah C. & Piette, Mary Ann, 2016. "A pattern-based automated approach to building energy model calibration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 214-224.
    11. Cristina Brunelli & Francesco Castellani & Alberto Garinei & Lorenzo Biondi & Marcello Marconi, 2016. "A Procedure to Perform Multi-Objective Optimization for Sustainable Design of Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Nagpal, Shreshth & Hanson, Jared & Reinhart, Christoph, 2019. "A framework for using calibrated campus-wide building energy models for continuous planning and greenhouse gas emissions reduction tracking," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 82-97.
    13. Bienvenido-Huertas, David & Sánchez-García, Daniel & Rubio-Bellido, Carlos, 2020. "Comparison of energy conservation measures considering adaptive thermal comfort and climate change in existing Mediterranean dwellings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    14. Kim, Yang-Seon & Heidarinejad, Mohammad & Dahlhausen, Matthew & Srebric, Jelena, 2017. "Building energy model calibration with schedules derived from electricity use data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 997-1007.
    15. Francesco Causone & Rossano Scoccia & Martina Pelle & Paola Colombo & Mario Motta & Sibilla Ferroni, 2021. "Neighborhood Energy Modeling and Monitoring: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Chen, Yixing & Hong, Tianzhen, 2018. "Impacts of building geometry modeling methods on the simulation results of urban building energy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 717-735.
    17. Tronchin, Lamberto & Manfren, Massimiliano & James, Patrick AB., 2018. "Linking design and operation performance analysis through model calibration: Parametric assessment on a Passive House building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 26-40.
    18. Calama-González, Carmen María & Symonds, Phil & Petrou, Giorgos & Suárez, Rafael & León-Rodríguez, Ángel Luis, 2021. "Bayesian calibration of building energy models for uncertainty analysis through test cells monitoring," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    19. Enríquez, R. & Jiménez, M.J. & Heras, M.R., 2017. "Towards non-intrusive thermal load Monitoring of buildings: BES calibration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 44-54.
    20. Sukjoon Oh & Juan-Carlos Baltazar & Jeff S. Haberl, 2022. "Assessment of the Impact of Using a Smart Thermostat and Smart Meter Data on a Whole-Building Energy Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:3791-:d:581162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.