IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i12p3598-d576468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Loads and Response of a Spar Buoy Wind Turbine with Pitch-Controlled Rotating Blades: An Experimental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Russo

    (Department of Engineering, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Roma, 29, 81031 Aversa, Italy
    Inter-University National Consortium for Marine Sciences (CoNISMa), Piazzale Flaminio, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Pasquale Contestabile

    (Department of Engineering, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Roma, 29, 81031 Aversa, Italy
    Inter-University National Consortium for Marine Sciences (CoNISMa), Piazzale Flaminio, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Andrea Bardazzi

    (Department of Engineering, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Roma, 29, 81031 Aversa, Italy)

  • Elisa Leone

    (Department of Engineering for Innovation, EUMER Campus Ecotekne, University of Salento, Via Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Gregorio Iglesias

    (School of Engineering, University College Cork, College Road, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
    Marine Building, School of Engineering, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK)

  • Giuseppe R. Tomasicchio

    (Department of Engineering for Innovation, EUMER Campus Ecotekne, University of Salento, Via Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Diego Vicinanza

    (Department of Engineering, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Roma, 29, 81031 Aversa, Italy
    Inter-University National Consortium for Marine Sciences (CoNISMa), Piazzale Flaminio, 00144 Rome, Italy
    CNR-INM, Institute of Marine Engineering, Via di Vallerano 139, 00128 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

New large-scale laboratory data are presented on a physical model of a spar buoy wind turbine with angular motion of control surfaces implemented (pitch control). The peculiarity of this type of rotating blade represents an essential aspect when studying floating offshore wind structures. Experiments were designed specifically to compare different operational environmental conditions in terms of wave steepness and wind speed. Results discussed here were derived from an analysis of only a part of the whole dataset. Consistent with recent small-scale experiments, data clearly show that the waves contributed to most of the model motions and mooring loads. A significant nonlinear behavior for sway, roll and yaw has been detected, whereas an increase in the wave period makes the wind speed less influential for surge, heave and pitch. In general, as the steepness increases, the oscillations decrease. However, higher wind speed does not mean greater platform motions. Data also indicate a significant role of the blade rotation in the turbine thrust, nacelle dynamic forces and power in six degrees of freedom. Certain pairs of wind speed-wave steepness are particularly unfavorable, since the first harmonic of the rotor (coupled to the first wave harmonic) causes the thrust force to be larger than that in more energetic sea states. The experiments suggest that the inclusion of pitch-controlled, variable-speed blades in physical (and numerical) tests on such types of structures is crucial, highlighting the importance of pitch motion as an important design factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Russo & Pasquale Contestabile & Andrea Bardazzi & Elisa Leone & Gregorio Iglesias & Giuseppe R. Tomasicchio & Diego Vicinanza, 2021. "Dynamic Loads and Response of a Spar Buoy Wind Turbine with Pitch-Controlled Rotating Blades: An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3598-:d:576468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3598/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3598/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bento, Nuno & Fontes, Margarida, 2019. "Emergence of floating offshore wind energy: Technology and industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 66-82.
    2. Wen, Yi & Kamranzad, Bahareh & Lin, Pengzhi, 2021. "Assessment of long-term offshore wind energy potential in the south and southeast coasts of China based on a 55-year dataset," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Tomasicchio, Giuseppe Roberto & D'Alessandro, Felice & Avossa, Alberto Maria & Riefolo, Luigia & Musci, Elena & Ricciardelli, Francesco & Vicinanza, Diego, 2018. "Experimental modelling of the dynamic behaviour of a spar buoy wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 412-432.
    4. Michael Borg & Morten Walkusch Jensen & Scott Urquhart & Morten Thøtt Andersen & Jonas Bjerg Thomsen & Henrik Stiesdal, 2020. "Technical Definition of the TetraSpar Demonstrator Floating Wind Turbine Foundation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-11, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lixun Zhu & Chao Ma & Wei Li, 2022. "A Novel Structure of Electromagnetic Lead Screw for Wave Energy Converter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, L. & Kolios, A. & Liu, X. & Venetsanos, D. & Rui, C., 2022. "Reliability of offshore wind turbine support structures: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Abbas, Nikhar J. & Jasa, John & Zalkind, Daniel S. & Wright, Alan & Pao, Lucy, 2024. "Control co-design of a floating offshore wind turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    3. Hokey Min & Yohannes Haile, 2021. "Examining the Role of Disruptive Innovation in Renewable Energy Businesses from a Cross National Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Wang, Xinbao & Cai, Chang & Cai, Shang-Gui & Wang, Tengyuan & Wang, Zekun & Song, Juanjuan & Rong, Xiaomin & Li, Qing'an, 2023. "A review of aerodynamic and wake characteristics of floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Rezaeiha, Abdolrahim & Micallef, Daniel, 2021. "Wake interactions of two tandem floating offshore wind turbines: CFD analysis using actuator disc model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 859-876.
    6. Wang, Hao & Wang, Tongguang & Ke, Shitang & Hu, Liang & Xie, Jiaojie & Cai, Xin & Cao, Jiufa & Ren, Yuxin, 2023. "Assessing code-based design wind loads for offshore wind turbines in China against typhoons," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 669-682.
    7. Wan, Ling & Moan, Torgeir & Gao, Zhen & Shi, Wei, 2024. "A review on the technical development of combined wind and wave energy conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    8. Rohe, Sebastian & Chlebna, Camilla, 2021. "A spatial perspective on the legitimacy of a technological innovation system: Regional differences in onshore wind energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Wang, Xinbao & Cai, Chang & Wu, Xianyou & Chen, Yewen & Wang, Tengyuan & Zhong, Xiaohui & Li, Qing'an, 2024. "Numerical validation of the dynamic aerodynamic similarity criterion for floating offshore wind turbines under equivalent pitch motions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    10. Jonas Bjerg Thomsen & Roger Bergua & Jason Jonkman & Amy Robertson & Nicole Mendoza & Cameron Brown & Christos Galinos & Henrik Stiesdal, 2021. "Modeling the TetraSpar Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Foundation as a Flexible Structure in OrcaFlex and OpenFAST," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Yang, Zihao & Dong, Sheng, 2024. "A novel framework for wind energy assessment at multi-time scale based on non-stationary wind speed models: A case study in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. Weiss, Daniel & Nemeczek, Fabian, 2021. "A text-based monitoring tool for the legitimacy and guidance of technological innovation systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Papi, F. & Bianchini, A., 2022. "Technical challenges in floating offshore wind turbine upscaling: A critical analysis based on the NREL 5 MW and IEA 15 MW Reference Turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    14. Charalampos Baniotopoulos, 2022. "Advances in Floating Wind Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-3, August.
    15. Daniela Pantusa & Antonio Francone & Giuseppe Roberto Tomasicchio, 2020. "Floating Offshore Renewable Energy Farms. A Life-Cycle Cost Analysis at Brindisi, Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Cao, Shugang & Cheng, Youliang & Duan, Jinlong & Fan, Xiaoxu, 2022. "Experimental investigation on the dynamic response of an innovative semi-submersible floating wind turbine with aquaculture cages," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1393-1415.
    17. Sajid Ali & Hongbae Park & Adnan Aslam Noon & Aamer Sharif & Daeyong Lee, 2024. "Accuracy Testing of Different Methods for Estimating Weibull Parameters of Wind Energy at Various Heights above Sea Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Li, Ming & Luo, Haojie & Zhou, Shijie & Senthil Kumar, Gokula Manikandan & Guo, Xinman & Law, Tin Chung & Cao, Sunliang, 2022. "State-of-the-art review of the flexibility and feasibility of emerging offshore and coastal ocean energy technologies in East and Southeast Asia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Ferrari, Francesco & Besio, Giovanni & Cassola, Federico & Mazzino, Andrea, 2020. "Optimized wind and wave energy resource assessment and offshore exploitability in the Mediterranean Sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    20. Alexandre Mathern & Christoph von der Haar & Steffen Marx, 2021. "Concrete Support Structures for Offshore Wind Turbines: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-31, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3598-:d:576468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.