IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i9p2171-d352974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Informational Efficiency of the EU Carbon Emission Trading Market: Asymmetric MF-DFA Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yun-Jung Lee

    (Institute of Economics and International Trade, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea)

  • Neung-Woo Kim

    (Institute of Economics and International Trade, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea)

  • Ki-Hong Choi

    (Institute of Economics and International Trade, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea)

  • Seong-Min Yoon

    (Department of Economics, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea)

Abstract

This study explores the degree and change of informational efficiency of the European Union (EU) carbon emission trading market using an asymmetric multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (A-MF-DFA) method, which allows asymmetry. For this purpose, we analysed the daily price series of the European Emissions Market, which is operated according to the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. This carbon market is the most active and has the largest trading volume. The data covers the period (from 4 August 2005 to 31 December 2019). The main results are summarised as follows. First, there is a multifractal feature in the price return movements of the EU carbon trading market, which behaves differently in the upward and downward periods of the market. Second, the informational efficiency of the carbon emission market has changed over time, with Phase I having the lowest informational efficiency and Phase III having the highest informational efficiency. These results indicate that informational efficiency has increased as the carbon emission market matures. Third, from the result of the market deficiency measure (MDM), Phase I showed the lowest market efficiency, whereas Phase III showed the highest efficiency. During Phase III, the MDM values of the upward period were higher than that of the downward period, implying higher market inefficiency during the upward period.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun-Jung Lee & Neung-Woo Kim & Ki-Hong Choi & Seong-Min Yoon, 2020. "Analysis of the Informational Efficiency of the EU Carbon Emission Trading Market: Asymmetric MF-DFA Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2171-:d:352974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2171/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2171/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alvarez-Ramirez, Jose & Rodriguez, Eduardo & Carlos Echeverria, Juan, 2009. "A DFA approach for assessing asymmetric correlations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(12), pages 2263-2270.
    2. Andros Gregoriou & Jerome Healy & Nicola Savvides, 2014. "Market efficiency and the basis in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 615-628, July.
    3. Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar & Hoque, Ariful, 2011. "Efficiency of European emissions markets: Lessons and implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6575-6582, October.
    4. Wei Lu & Wenjun Wang, 2010. "Weak-form efficiency of European Union emission trading scheme – evidence from variance ratio tests," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 183-196.
    5. Scott J. Niblock & Jennifer L. Harrison, 2013. "Carbon markets in times of VUCA: a weak-form efficiency investigation of the phase II EU ETS," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 38-56, January.
    6. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier & Fouilloux, Jessica, 2011. "Testing the martingale difference hypothesis in CO2 emission allowances," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(1-2), pages 27-35, January.
    7. Lehmann, Paul & Gawel, Erik, 2013. "Why should support schemes for renewable electricity complement the EU emissions trading scheme?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 597-607.
    8. Lee, Minhyuk & Song, Jae Wook & Park, Ji Hwan & Chang, Woojin, 2017. "Asymmetric multi-fractality in the U.S. stock indices using index-based model of A-MFDFA," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 28-38.
    9. Cao, Guangxi & Cao, Jie & Xu, Longbing, 2013. "Asymmetric multifractal scaling behavior in the Chinese stock market: Based on asymmetric MF-DFA," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(4), pages 797-807.
    10. Wang, Yudong & Liu, Li & Gu, Rongbao, 2009. "Analysis of efficiency for Shenzhen stock market based on multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 271-276, December.
    11. Daskalakis, George, 2013. "On the efficiency of the European carbon market: New evidence from Phase II," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 369-375.
    12. Piia Aatola & Kimmo Ollikka & Markku Ollikainen, 2014. "Informational efficiency of the EU ETS market - a study of price predictability and profitable trading," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 92-123, March.
    13. Mensi, Walid & Lee, Yun-Jung & Al-Yahyaee, Khamis Hamed & Sensoy, Ahmet & Yoon, Seong-Min, 2019. "Intraday downward/upward multifractality and long memory in Bitcoin and Ethereum markets: An asymmetric multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 19-25.
    14. Crossland, Jarrod & Li, Bin & Roca, Eduardo, 2013. "Is the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) informationally efficient? Evidence from momentum-based trading strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 10-23.
    15. Montagnoli, Alberto & de Vries, Frans P., 2010. "Carbon trading thickness and market efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1331-1336, November.
    16. Cao, Guangxi & Xu, Wei, 2016. "Multifractal features of EUA and CER futures markets by using multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis based on empirical model decomposition," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 212-222.
    17. Kantelhardt, Jan W. & Zschiegner, Stephan A. & Koscielny-Bunde, Eva & Havlin, Shlomo & Bunde, Armin & Stanley, H.Eugene, 2002. "Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 316(1), pages 87-114.
    18. Rizvi, Syed Aun R. & Dewandaru, Ginanjar & Bacha, Obiyathulla I. & Masih, Mansur, 2014. "An analysis of stock market efficiency: Developed vs Islamic stock markets using MF-DFA," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 407(C), pages 86-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sattarhoff, Cristina & Gronwald, Marc, 2022. "Measuring informational efficiency of the European carbon market — A quantitative evaluation of higher order dependence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Ren, Xiaohang & Xiao, Ya & Duan, Kun & Urquhart, Andrew, 2024. "Spillover effects between fossil energy and green markets: Evidence from informational inefficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Haider Ali & Faheem Aslam & Paulo Ferreira, 2021. "Modeling Dynamic Multifractal Efficiency of US Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Yao, Can-Zhong & Mo, Yi-Na & Zhang, Ze-Kun, 2021. "A study of the efficiency of the Chinese clean energy stock market and its correlation with the crude oil market based on an asymmetric multifractal scaling behavior analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    5. Qiyun Cheng & Huiting Qiao & Yimiao Gu & Zhenxi Chen, 2023. "Price Dynamics and Interactions between the Chinese and European Carbon Emission Trading Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Nan Li & Beibei Shi & Rong Kang, 2021. "Information Disclosure, Coal Withdrawal and Carbon Emissions Reductions: A Policy Test Based on China’s Environmental Information Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Tao Yin & Yiming Wang, 2021. "Market Efficiency and Nonlinear Analysis of Soybean Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-10, January.
    8. Zhuang, Xiaoyang & Wei, Dan, 2022. "Asymmetric multifractality, comparative efficiency analysis of green finance markets: A dynamic study by index-based model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 604(C).
    9. Cao, Guangxi & Ling, Meijun, 2022. "Asymmetry and conduction direction of the interdependent structure between cryptocurrency and US dollar, renminbi, and gold markets," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Yousaf, Imran & Karim, Sitara & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Farid, Saqib, 2023. "Comparing asymmetric price efficiency in regional ESG markets before and during COVID-19," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Farid, Saqib & Ferrer, Román & Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain, 2021. "Comparative efficiency of green and conventional bonds pre- and during COVID-19: An asymmetric multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Yao, Can-Zhong & Mo, Yi-Na & Zhang, Ze-Kun, 2021. "A study of the efficiency of the Chinese clean energy stock market and its correlation with the crude oil market based on an asymmetric multifractal scaling behavior analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    3. Gajardo, Gabriel & Kristjanpoller, Werner D. & Minutolo, Marcel, 2018. "Does Bitcoin exhibit the same asymmetric multifractal cross-correlations with crude oil, gold and DJIA as the Euro, Great British Pound and Yen?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 195-205.
    4. Kakinaka, Shinji & Umeno, Ken, 2021. "Exploring asymmetric multifractal cross-correlations of price–volatility and asymmetric volatility dynamics in cryptocurrency markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    5. Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Karim, Sitara & Farid, Saqib & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2022. "Comparing the asymmetric efficiency of dirty and clean energy markets pre and during COVID-19," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 548-562.
    6. Mensi, Walid & Vo, Xuan Vinh & Kang, Sang Hoon, 2022. "Upward/downward multifractality and efficiency in metals futures markets: The impacts of financial and oil crises," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Bouri, Elie & Peng, Zhe & Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2021. "Asymmetric efficiency of cryptocurrencies during COVID19," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    8. Fan, Xinghua & Lv, Xiangxiang & Yin, Jiuli & Tian, Lixin & Liang, Jiaochen, 2019. "Multifractality and market efficiency of carbon emission trading market: Analysis using the multifractal detrended fluctuation technique," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Bouri, Elie & Kayani, Ghulam Mujtaba & Nasir, Rana Muhammad & Kristoufek, Ladislav, 2020. "Are clean energy stocks efficient? Asymmetric multifractal scaling behaviour," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 550(C).
    10. Zhuang, Xiaoyang & Wei, Dan, 2022. "Asymmetric multifractality, comparative efficiency analysis of green finance markets: A dynamic study by index-based model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 604(C).
    11. Gajardo, Gabriel & Kristjanpoller, Werner, 2017. "Asymmetric multifractal cross-correlations and time varying features between Latin-American stock market indices and crude oil market," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 121-128.
    12. Lee, Minhyuk & Song, Jae Wook & Park, Ji Hwan & Chang, Woojin, 2017. "Asymmetric multi-fractality in the U.S. stock indices using index-based model of A-MFDFA," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 28-38.
    13. Mensi, Walid & Vo, Xuan Vinh & Kang, Sang Hoon, 2021. "Upside-Downside Multifractality and Efficiency of Green Bonds: The Roles of Global Factors and COVID-19," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    14. Lee, Minhyuk & Song, Jae Wook & Kim, Sondo & Chang, Woojin, 2018. "Asymmetric market efficiency using the index-based asymmetric-MFDFA," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 1278-1294.
    15. Hintermann, Beat & Peterson, Sonja & Rickels, Wilfried, 2014. "Price and market behavior in Phase II of the EU ETS," Kiel Working Papers 1962, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Mensi, Walid & Sensoy, Ahmet & Vo, Xuan Vinh & Kang, Sang Hoon, 2020. "Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on asymmetric multifractality of gold and oil prices," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    17. Ruan, Qingsong & Zhang, Manqian & Lv, Dayong & Yang, Haiquan, 2018. "SAD and stock returns revisited: Nonlinear analysis based on MF-DCCA and Granger test," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 1009-1022.
    18. Chenyu Han & Yiming Wang & Yingying Xu, 2019. "Efficiency and Multifractality Analysis of the Chinese Stock Market: Evidence from Stock Indices before and after the 2015 Stock Market Crash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Liu, Junlin & Chen, Feier, 2018. "Asymmetric volatility varies in different dry bulk freight rate markets under structure breaks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 316-327.
    20. Cao, Guangxi & Han, Yan & Li, Qingchen & Xu, Wei, 2017. "Asymmetric MF-DCCA method based on risk conduction and its application in the Chinese and foreign stock markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 119-130.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2171-:d:352974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.