IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jsustf/v3y2013i1p38-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon markets in times of VUCA: a weak-form efficiency investigation of the phase II EU ETS

Author

Listed:
  • Scott J. Niblock
  • Jennifer L. Harrison

Abstract

We examine the weak-form efficiency status of the European carbon market over periods of sustained volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity. We use 1,035 daily spot price data observations from the Phase II European Union Emissions Trading Scheme from 2008 to 2012, along with random walk and trading rule profitability tests. To establish the evolution of weak-form efficiency, the time period under investigation is further divided into two distinct crisis periods, i.e. global financial crisis (GFC) period and European sovereign debt crisis (ESDC) period. Period 1 random walk test findings provide limited support for price return predictability in the European carbon market during the GFC. Period 2 results show that price return predictabilities became non-existent during the ESDC. Trading rule profitability findings reveal that after applying simple trading rules (that account for risk and transaction costs), price return predictabilities cannot be manipulated to profit above a naive buy-and-hold strategy in the European carbon market. Despite ongoing market volatility, economic uncertainty and complexity, and global climate change policy ambiguity, it appears that the EU ETS is becoming more weak-form efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott J. Niblock & Jennifer L. Harrison, 2013. "Carbon markets in times of VUCA: a weak-form efficiency investigation of the phase II EU ETS," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 38-56, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:38-56
    DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2013.765381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20430795.2013.765381
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20430795.2013.765381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Carolina Rezende de Carvalho Ferreira & Vinicius Amorim Sobreiro & Herbert Kimura & Flavio Luiz de Moraes Barboza, 2016. "A systematic review of literature about finance and sustainability," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 112-147, April.
    2. Ren, Xiaohang & Xiao, Ya & Duan, Kun & Urquhart, Andrew, 2024. "Spillover effects between fossil energy and green markets: Evidence from informational inefficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Hintermann, Beat & Peterson, Sonja & Rickels, Wilfried, 2014. "Price and market behavior in Phase II of the EU ETS," Kiel Working Papers 1962, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Friedrich, Marina & Mauer, Eva-Maria & Pahle, Michael & Tietjen, Oliver, 2020. "From fundamentals to financial assets: the evolution of understanding price formation in the EU ETS," EconStor Preprints 196150, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, revised 2020.
    5. Yun-Jung Lee & Neung-Woo Kim & Ki-Hong Choi & Seong-Min Yoon, 2020. "Analysis of the Informational Efficiency of the EU Carbon Emission Trading Market: Asymmetric MF-DFA Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Panha Heng & Scott J. Niblock, 2014. "Trading with Tigers: A Technical Analysis of Southeast Asian Stock Index Futures," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 679-692, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:38-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSFI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.