IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i24p6702-d464705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Preliminary Techno-Economic Comparison between DC Electrification and Trains with On-Board Energy Storage Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Regina Lamedica

    (Department of Astronautical, Electrical, and Energy Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Alessandro Ruvio

    (Department of Astronautical, Electrical, and Energy Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Manuel Tobia

    (Department of Astronautical, Electrical, and Energy Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Guido Guidi Buffarini

    (Italferr S.p.A., 00155 Rome, Italy)

  • Nicola Carones

    (Italferr S.p.A., 00155 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The paper presents a preliminary technical-economic comparison between a 3 kV DC railway and the use of trains with on-board storage systems. Numerical simulations have been carried out on a real railway line, which presents an electrified section at 3 kV DC and a non-electrified section, currently covered by diesel-powered trains. Different types of ESS have been analyzed, implementing the models in Matlab/Simulink environment. A preparatory economic investigation has been carried out.

Suggested Citation

  • Regina Lamedica & Alessandro Ruvio & Manuel Tobia & Guido Guidi Buffarini & Nicola Carones, 2020. "A Preliminary Techno-Economic Comparison between DC Electrification and Trains with On-Board Energy Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6702-:d:464705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6702/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6702/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maarten Messagie & Faycal-Siddikou Boureima & Thierry Coosemans & Cathy Macharis & Joeri Van Mierlo, 2014. "A Range-Based Vehicle Life Cycle Assessment Incorporating Variability in the Environmental Assessment of Different Vehicle Technologies and Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefano Menicanti & Marco di Benedetto & Davide Marinelli & Fabio Crescimbini, 2022. "Recovery of Trains’ Braking Energy in a Railway Micro-Grid Devoted to Train plus Electric Vehicle Integrated Mobility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Kasun Subasinghage & Kosala Gunawardane & Nisitha Padmawansa & Nihal Kularatna & Mehdi Moradian, 2022. "Modern Supercapacitors Technologies and Their Applicability in Mature Electrical Engineering Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Cipek, Mihael & Pavković, Danijel & Krznar, Matija & Kljaić, Zdenko & Mlinarić, Tomislav Josip, 2021. "Comparative analysis of conventional diesel-electric and hypothetical battery-electric heavy haul locomotive operation in terms of fuel savings and emissions reduction potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    4. Kumar, Gokula Manikandan Senthil & Cao, Sunliang, 2023. "Leveraging energy flexibilities for enhancing the cost-effectiveness and grid-responsiveness of net-zero-energy metro railway and station systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Yanpeng & Applegate, Scott & Yue, Wencong & Cai, Jianying & Wang, Xuan & Liu, Gengyuan & Li, Chunhui, 2017. "A hybrid life cycle and multi-criteria decision analysis approach for identifying sustainable development strategies of Beijing's taxi fleet," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 314-325.
    2. Chun Yang & Jui-Che Tu & Qianling Jiang, 2020. "The Influential Factors of Consumers’ Sustainable Consumption: A Case on Electric Vehicles in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Marmiroli, Benedetta & Venditti, Mattia & Dotelli, Giovanni & Spessa, Ezio, 2020. "The transport of goods in the urban environment: A comparative life cycle assessment of electric, compressed natural gas and diesel light-duty vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Anca N. Iuga (Butnariu) & Vasile N. Popa & Luminița I. Popa, 2018. "Comparative Analysis of Automotive Products Regarding the Influence of Eco-Friendly Methods to Emissions’ Reduction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Hasan-Basri, Bakti & Mohd Mustafa, Muzafarshah & Bakar, Normizan, 2019. "Are Malaysian Consumers Willing to Pay for Hybrid Cars’ Attributes?," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 53(1), pages 121-134.
    6. Cox, Brian & Bauer, Christian & Mendoza Beltran, Angelica & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Mutel, Christopher L., 2020. "Life cycle environmental and cost comparison of current and future passenger cars under different energy scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    7. Felipe Cerdas & Paul Titscher & Nicolas Bognar & Richard Schmuch & Martin Winter & Arno Kwade & Christoph Herrmann, 2018. "Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Mayank Jha & Frede Blaabjerg & Mohammed Ali Khan & Varaha Satya Bharath Kurukuru & Ahteshamul Haque, 2019. "Intelligent Control of Converter for Electric Vehicles Charging Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Xin Sun & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner & Jianxin Yang, 2021. "Criticality Assessment of the Life Cycle of Passenger Vehicles Produced in China," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 435-455, June.
    10. Siqin Xiong & Junping Ji & Xiaoming Ma, 2019. "Comparative Life Cycle Energy and GHG Emission Analysis for BEVs and PhEVs: A Case Study in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Danielis, Romeo & Giansoldati, Marco & Scorrano, Mariangela, 2019. "Comparing the life-cycle CO2 emissions of the best-selling electric and internal combustion engine cars in Italy," Working Papers 19_1, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica.
    12. David Borge-Diez & Pedro Miguel Ortega-Cabezas & Antonio Colmenar-Santos & Jorge Juan Blanes-Peiró, 2021. "Contribution of Driving Efficiency to Vehicle-to-Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-30, June.
    13. Eckard Helmers & Johannes Dietz & Martin Weiss, 2020. "Sensitivity Analysis in the Life-Cycle Assessment of Electric vs. Combustion Engine Cars under Approximate Real-World Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-31, February.
    14. Lei Zhang & Zhenpo Wang & Fengchun Sun & David G. Dorrell, 2014. "Online Parameter Identification of Ultracapacitor Models Using the Extended Kalman Filter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Cedric De Cauwer & Wouter Verbeke & Thierry Coosemans & Saphir Faid & Joeri Van Mierlo, 2017. "A Data-Driven Method for Energy Consumption Prediction and Energy-Efficient Routing of Electric Vehicles in Real-World Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Hooftman, Nils & Messagie, Maarten & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Coosemans, Thierry, 2018. "A review of the European passenger car regulations – Real driving emissions vs local air quality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-21.
    17. Wojciech Cieslik & Filip Szwajca & Wojciech Golimowski & Andrew Berger, 2021. "Experimental Analysis of Residential Photovoltaic (PV) and Electric Vehicle (EV) Systems in Terms of Annual Energy Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Gautham Ram Chandra Mouli & Peter Van Duijsen & Francesca Grazian & Ajay Jamodkar & Pavol Bauer & Olindo Isabella, 2020. "Sustainable E-Bike Charging Station That Enables AC, DC and Wireless Charging from Solar Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Sergio Maria Patella & Flavio Scrucca & Francesco Asdrubali & Stefano Carrese, 2019. "Traffic Simulation-Based Approach for A Cradle-to-Grave Greenhouse Gases Emission Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Shafique, Muhammad & Azam, Anam & Rafiq, Muhammad & Luo, Xiaowei, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles and internal combustion engine vehicles: A case study of Hong Kong," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6702-:d:464705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.