IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i21p5601-d435080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boosting Energy Efficiency and Solar Energy inside the Residential, Commercial, and Public Services Sectors in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Genice K. Grande-Acosta

    (Instituto de Energías Renovables, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Priv. Xochicalco s/n, Col. Centro, Temixco, Morelos 62580, Mexico)

  • Jorge M. Islas-Samperio

    (Instituto de Energías Renovables, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Priv. Xochicalco s/n, Col. Centro, Temixco, Morelos 62580, Mexico)

Abstract

The residential, commercial, and public sectors consume between 20% and 30% of final energy demand worldwide. Due to the intensive use of fossil fuels and conventional electricity, they also have an important participation in the emission of greenhouse gases (GHG). Taking Mexico as a case study, this article develops an alternative scenario that considers that in these sectors, buildings can generate energy for self-consumption or to supply it to the power network—for which four solar energy options are analyzed. In addition, to manage and rationalize the energy demand of these buildings, eight energy efficiency measures are studied. These options were selected on the basis that they are technically and economically feasible to implement in buildings in Mexico. The results reveal that by 2030, in relation to the GHG trend scenario, this mitigation scenario reduces 23.5 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO 2e ) in the residential (19 MtCO 2e ), commercial (2.6 MtCO 2e ), and public services sectors (1.9 MtCO 2e ), while by 2035 it reaches 45 MtCO 2e ; which far exceed the avoided emissions goals established in Mexico’s nationally determined contributions (NDC) for 2030 (5 MtCO 2e ) for the residential and commercial sectors. Therefore, it is possible to increase the ambition for mitigation in these sectors, as well as including the public sector, in a renewed Mexico’s NDC. This mitigation scenario generates a total economic benefit of $7.7 billion, which means that it does not generate an overall incremental cost, but requires an incremental investment of over $9 billion USD, which is a financing challenge to achieve this scenario.

Suggested Citation

  • Genice K. Grande-Acosta & Jorge M. Islas-Samperio, 2020. "Boosting Energy Efficiency and Solar Energy inside the Residential, Commercial, and Public Services Sectors in Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5601-:d:435080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grande, Genice & Islas, Jorge & Rios, Mario, 2015. "Technical and economic analysis of Domestic High Consumption Tariff niche market for photovoltaic systems in the Mexican household sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 738-748.
    2. Mateus, Ricardo & Silva, Sandra Monteiro & de Almeida, Manuela Guedes, 2019. "Environmental and cost life cycle analysis of the impact of using solar systems in energy renovation of Southern European single-family buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 82-92.
    3. García, Carlos A. & Riegelhaupt, Enrique & Ghilardi, Adrián & Skutsch, Margaret & Islas, Jorge & Manzini, Fabio & Masera, Omar, 2015. "Sustainable bioenergy options for Mexico: GHG mitigation and costs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 545-552.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wim Van Opstal & Anse Smeets, 2022. "Market-Specific Barriers and Enablers for Organizational Investments in Solar PV—Lessons from Flanders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Guadalupe Pérez & Jorge M. Islas-Samperio & Genice K. Grande-Acosta & Fabio Manzini, 2022. "Socioeconomic and Environmental Aspects of Traditional Firewood for Cooking on the Example of Rural and Peri-Urban Mexican Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, July.
    3. Gonca Özer Yaman, 2025. "Determination of Optimum Passive Design Parameters for Industrial Buildings in Different Climate Zones Using an Energy Performance Optimization Model Based on an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Pa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-34, March.
    4. Charifa Haouraji & Badia Mounir & Ilham Mounir & Abdelmajid Farchi, 2021. "Exploring the Relationship between Residential CO 2 Emissions, Urbanization, Economic Growth, and Residential Energy Consumption: Evidence from the North Africa Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pérez-Denicia, Eduardo & Fernández-Luqueño, Fabián & Vilariño-Ayala, Darnes & Manuel Montaño-Zetina, Luis & Alfonso Maldonado-López, Luis, 2017. "Renewable energy sources for electricity generation in Mexico: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 597-613.
    2. Marco Mele, 2019. "Renewable Energy Consumption: the Effects on Economic Growth in Mexico," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 269-273.
    3. Silva, D.A.L. & Filleti, R.A.P. & Musule, R. & Matheus, T.T. & Freire, F., 2022. "A systematic review and life cycle assessment of biomass pellets and briquettes production in Latin America," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno & Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Javier Garrido & Joel Donaldo Verdugo-Diaz, 2018. "Stand-Alone Photovoltaic System Assessment in Warmer Urban Areas in Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Vera, Ivan & Wicke, Birka & Lamers, Patrick & Cowie, Annette & Repo, Anna & Heukels, Bas & Zumpf, Colleen & Styles, David & Parish, Esther & Cherubini, Francesco & Berndes, Göran & Jager, Henriette & , 2022. "Land use for bioenergy: Synergies and trade-offs between sustainable development goals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Ulises Flores Hernández & Dirk Jaeger & Jorge Islas Samperio, 2017. "Bioenergy Potential and Utilization Costs for the Supply of Forest Woody Biomass for Energetic Use at a Regional Scale in Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Pengying Wang & Shuo Zhang, 2022. "Retrofitting Strategies Based on Orthogonal Array Testing to Develop Nearly Zero Energy Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Almeida, Manuela & Ascione, Fabrizio & Iovane, Teresa & Mastellone, Margherita & Mateus, Ricardo, 2024. "Impact of life cycle assessment analysis on energy efficiency projects in Mediterranean residential buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    9. Gabriel, Cle-Anne, 2016. "What is challenging renewable energy entrepreneurs in developing countries?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 362-371.
    10. Cui, Yuanlong & Zhu, Jie & Meng, Fanran & Zoras, Stamatis & McKechnie, Jon & Chu, Junze, 2020. "Energy assessment and economic sensitivity analysis of a grid-connected photovoltaic system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 101-115.
    11. Hancevic, Pedro I. & Nuñez, Hector M. & Rosellon, Juan, 2017. "Distributed photovoltaic power generation: Possibilities, benefits, and challenges for a widespread application in the Mexican residential sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 478-489.
    12. Wenjing Cui & Jingke Hong & Guiwen Liu & Kaijian Li & Yuanyuan Huang & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Co-Benefits Analysis of Buildings Based on Different Renewal Strategies: The Emergy-Lca Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.
    13. López-Ochoa, Luis M. & Las-Heras-Casas, Jesús & González-Caballín, Juan M. & Carpio, Manuel, 2023. "Towards nearly zero-energy residential buildings in Mediterranean countries: The implementation of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive 2018 in Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    14. García, Carlos A. & Manzini, Fabio & Islas, Jorge M., 2017. "Sustainability assessment of ethanol production from two crops in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1199-1207.
    15. Yuanlong Cui & Shuangqing Tian & Jie Zhu & Stamatis Zoras & Yiming Shao, 2023. "Energy and Stochastic Economic Assessments of Photovoltaic Systems in the East Midlands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-35, September.
    16. Patricia Jissette Rodríguez Sánchez & Mariana Hernández González & Juliana Carmenza Bello Arias, 2018. "Eco-Innovation And Sustainable Production In Developing Countries. Cases Colombia And Mexico," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 12(1), pages 228-238.
    17. Oscar Ruíz-Carmona & Jorge M. Islas-Samperio & Lourdes Larrondo-Posadas & Fabio Manzini & Genice K. Grande-Acosta & Christian Álvarez-Escobedo, 2021. "Solid Biofuels Scenarios from Rural Agricultural and Forestry Residues for Mexican Industrial SMEs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Mateo Mogrovejo-Narvaez & Antonio Barragán-Escandón & Esteban Zalamea-León & Xavier Serrano-Guerrero, 2024. "Barriers to the Implementation of On-Grid Photovoltaic Systems in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Bilgili, Faik & Koçak, Emrah & Bulut, Ümit & Kuşkaya, Sevda, 2017. "Can biomass energy be an efficient policy tool for sustainable development?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 830-845.
    20. Akinyele, D.O. & Rayudu, R.K., 2016. "Community-based hybrid electricity supply system: A practical and comparative approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 608-628.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5601-:d:435080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.