IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i21p5599-d435048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Combined Deep Learning and Ensemble Learning Methodology to Avoid Electricity Theft in Smart Grids

Author

Listed:
  • Zeeshan Aslam

    (Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Nadeem Javaid

    (Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Ashfaq Ahmad

    (School of Electrical Engineering and Computing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, Australia)

  • Abrar Ahmed

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Sardar Muhammad Gulfam

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

Abstract

Electricity is widely used around 80% of the world. Electricity theft has dangerous effects on utilities in terms of power efficiency and costs billions of dollars per annum. The enhancement of the traditional grids gave rise to smart grids that enable one to resolve the dilemma of electricity theft detection (ETD) using an extensive amount of data formulated by smart meters. This data are used by power utilities to examine the consumption behaviors of consumers and to decide whether the consumer is an electricity thief or benign. However, the traditional data-driven methods for ETD have poor detection performances due to the high-dimensional imbalanced data and their limited ETD capability. In this paper, we present a new class balancing mechanism based on the interquartile minority oversampling technique and a combined ETD model to overcome the shortcomings of conventional approaches. The combined ETD model is composed of long short-term memory (LSTM), UNet and adaptive boosting (Adaboost), and termed LSTM–UNet–Adaboost. In this regard, LSTM–UNet–Adaboost combines the advantages of deep learning (LSTM-UNet) along with ensemble learning (Adaboost) for ETD. Moreover, the performance of the proposed LSTM–UNet–Adaboost scheme was simulated and evaluated over the real-time smart meter dataset given by the State Grid Corporation of China. The simulations were conducted using the most appropriate performance indicators, such as area under the curve, precision, recall and F1 measure. The proposed solution obtained the highest results as compared to the existing benchmark schemes in terms of selected performance measures. More specifically, it achieved the detection rate of 0.92, which was the highest among existing benchmark schemes, such as logistic regression, support vector machine and random under-sampling boosting technique. Therefore, the simulation outcomes validate that the proposed LSTM–UNet–Adaboost model surpasses other traditional methods in terms of ETD and is more acceptable for real-time practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeeshan Aslam & Nadeem Javaid & Ashfaq Ahmad & Abrar Ahmed & Sardar Muhammad Gulfam, 2020. "A Combined Deep Learning and Ensemble Learning Methodology to Avoid Electricity Theft in Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5599-:d:435048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5599/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5599/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Depuru, Soma Shekara Sreenadh Reddy & Wang, Lingfeng & Devabhaktuni, Vijay, 2011. "Electricity theft: Overview, issues, prevention and a smart meter based approach to control theft," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 1007-1015, February.
    2. Md. Nazmul Hasan & Rafia Nishat Toma & Abdullah-Al Nahid & M M Manjurul Islam & Jong-Myon Kim, 2019. "Electricity Theft Detection in Smart Grid Systems: A CNN-LSTM Based Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Zahoor Ali Khan & Muhammad Adil & Nadeem Javaid & Malik Najmus Saqib & Muhammad Shafiq & Jin-Ghoo Choi, 2020. "Electricity Theft Detection Using Supervised Learning Techniques on Smart Meter Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Ahmad, Tanveer, 2017. "Non-technical loss analysis and prevention using smart meters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 573-589.
    5. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Gusti Ayu Novi Yutami, I, 2014. "Smart meter adoption and deployment strategy for residential buildings in Indonesia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 336-349.
    6. Manur, Ashray & Venkataramanan, Giri & Sehloff, David, 2018. "Simple electric utility platform: A hardware/software solution for operating emergent microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 748-763.
    7. Gaur, Vasundhara & Gupta, Eshita, 2016. "The determinants of electricity theft: An empirical analysis of Indian states," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 127-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Savian, Fernando de Souza & Siluk, Julio Cezar Mairesse & Garlet, Taís Bisognin & do Nascimento, Felipe Moraes & Pinheiro, José Renes & Vale, Zita, 2021. "Non-technical losses: A systematic contemporary article review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Herodotos Herodotou, 2021. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Data-Intensive Computing in Smart Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-3, May.
    3. Jason Runge & Radu Zmeureanu, 2021. "A Review of Deep Learning Techniques for Forecasting Energy Use in Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, January.
    4. Pamir & Nadeem Javaid & Saher Javaid & Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Umar Javed & Adamu Sani Yahaya & Sheraz Aslam, 2022. "Synthetic Theft Attacks and Long Short Term Memory-Based Preprocessing for Electricity Theft Detection Using Gated Recurrent Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Youngghyu Sun & Jiyoung Lee & Soohyun Kim & Joonho Seon & Seongwoo Lee & Chanuk Kyeong & Jinyoung Kim, 2023. "Energy Theft Detection Model Based on VAE-GAN for Imbalanced Dataset," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Marcelo Bruno Capeletti & Bruno Knevitz Hammerschmitt & Renato Grethe Negri & Fernando Guilherme Kaehler Guarda & Lucio Rene Prade & Nelson Knak Neto & Alzenira da Rosa Abaide, 2022. "Identification of Nontechnical Losses in Distribution Systems Adding Exogenous Data and Artificial Intelligence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Xuesong Tian & Yuping Zou & Xin Wang & Minglang Tseng & Hua Li & Huijuan Zhang, 2022. "Improving the Efficiency and Sustainability of Intelligent Electricity Inspection: IMFO-ELM Algorithm for Load Forecasting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Mohamed S. Abdalzaher & Mostafa M. Fouda & Mohamed I. Ibrahem, 2022. "Data Privacy Preservation and Security in Smart Metering Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Benish Kabir & Umar Qasim & Nadeem Javaid & Abdulaziz Aldegheishem & Nabil Alrajeh & Emad A. Mohammed, 2022. "Detecting Nontechnical Losses in Smart Meters Using a MLP-GRU Deep Model and Augmenting Data via Theft Attacks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stracqualursi, Erika & Rosato, Antonello & Di Lorenzo, Gianfranco & Panella, Massimo & Araneo, Rodolfo, 2023. "Systematic review of energy theft practices and autonomous detection through artificial intelligence methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Babar, Zainab & Jamil, Faisal & Haq, Wajiha, 2022. "Consumer's perception towards electricity theft: A case study of Islamabad and Rawalpindi using a path analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Razavi, Rouzbeh & Gharipour, Amin & Fleury, Martin & Akpan, Ikpe Justice, 2019. "A practical feature-engineering framework for electricity theft detection in smart grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 481-494.
    4. Hugo Brise o & Omar Rojas, 2020. "Factors Associated with Electricity Losses: A Panel Data Perspective," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 281-286.
    5. Wabukala, Benard M. & Mukisa, Nicholas & Watundu, Susan & Bergland, Olvar & Rudaheranwa, Nichodemus & Adaramola, Muyiwa S., 2023. "Impact of household electricity theft and unaffordability on electricity security: A case of Uganda," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Adongo, Charles Atanga & Taale, Francis & Bukari, Shaibu & Suleman, Shafic & Amadu, Iddrisu, 2021. "Electricity theft whistleblowing feasibility in commercial accommodation facilities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Sufian A. Badawi & Djamel Guessoum & Isam Elbadawi & Ameera Albadawi, 2022. "A Novel Time-Series Transformation and Machine-Learning-Based Method for NTL Fraud Detection in Utility Companies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Jamil, Faisal & Ahmad, Eatzaz, 2019. "Policy considerations for limiting electricity theft in the developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 452-458.
    9. Xiaofeng Feng & Hengyu Hui & Ziyang Liang & Wenchong Guo & Huakun Que & Haoyang Feng & Yu Yao & Chengjin Ye & Yi Ding, 2020. "A Novel Electricity Theft Detection Scheme Based on Text Convolutional Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Dileep, G., 2020. "A survey on smart grid technologies and applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2589-2625.
    11. Yousef Abdel Jawad & Issam Ayyash, 2020. "Analyze the Loss of Electricity in Palestine Case Study: Ramallah and Al-Bireh Governorate," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 7-15.
    12. Muhammad Salman Saeed & Mohd Wazir Mustafa & Nawaf N. Hamadneh & Nawa A. Alshammari & Usman Ullah Sheikh & Touqeer Ahmed Jumani & Saifulnizam Bin Abd Khalid & Ilyas Khan, 2020. "Detection of Non-Technical Losses in Power Utilities—A Comprehensive Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Ahmad, Tanveer & Chen, Huanxin & Wang, Jiangyu & Guo, Yabin, 2018. "Review of various modeling techniques for the detection of electricity theft in smart grid environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2916-2933.
    14. Athanasiadis, C.L. & Papadopoulos, T.A. & Kryonidis, G.C. & Doukas, D.I., 2024. "A review of distribution network applications based on smart meter data analytics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Savian, Fernando de Souza & Siluk, Julio Cezar Mairesse & Garlet, Taís Bisognin & do Nascimento, Felipe Moraes & Pinheiro, José Renes & Vale, Zita, 2021. "Non-technical losses: A systematic contemporary article review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    16. Hugo Brise o & Omar Rojas, 2020. "Factors Associated with Electricity Theft in Mexico," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 250-254.
    17. Arkorful, Vincent Ekow, 2022. "Unravelling electricity theft whistleblowing antecedents using the theory of planned behavior and norm activation model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Hany Habbak & Mohamed Mahmoud & Mostafa M. Fouda & Maazen Alsabaan & Ahmed Mattar & Gouda I. Salama & Khaled Metwally, 2023. "Efficient One-Class False Data Detector Based on Deep SVDD for Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-28, October.
    19. Hugo Brise o & Jessica Rubiano & Rodolfo Garc a & Omar Rojas, 2021. "Factors Associated with Electricity Losses in Colombia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 465-470.
    20. Costa-Campi, Maria Teresa & Daví-Arderius, Daniel & Trujillo-Baute, Elisa, 2018. "The economic impact of electricity losses," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 309-322.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5599-:d:435048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.