IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i20p5342-d427589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Struvite Recovered from Anaerobic Digestate in a Farm Bio-Refinery as a Slow-Release Fertiliser

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Szymańska

    (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences–SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-766 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Tomasz Sosulski

    (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences–SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-766 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Adriana Bożętka

    (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences–SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-766 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Urszula Dawidowicz

    (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences–SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-766 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Adam Wąs

    (Institute of Economics and Finances, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Ewa Szara

    (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences–SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-766 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Agata Malak-Rawlikowska

    (Institute of Economics and Finances, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Piotr Sulewski

    (Institute of Economics and Finances, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Gijs W. P. van Pruissen

    (Cornelissen Consulting Services BV, Binnensingel 3, 7411 PL Deventer, The Netherlands)

  • René L. Cornelissen

    (Cornelissen Consulting Services BV, Binnensingel 3, 7411 PL Deventer, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Biogas production in agricultural biogas plants generates digestate—liquid waste containing organic matter and mineral nutrients. Utilisation of the digestate on farm fields adjacent to the biogas plants is limited. Therefore, bio-refineries implement advanced forms of digestate processing, including precipitation of struvite (MgNH 4 PO 4 . 6H 2 O). Struvite can be transported over long distances and dosed precisely to meet the nutritional needs of the plants. Divergent opinions on the fertilising value of struvite and its function over time call for further research on its effects on crop yields in the first and subsequent years after application. This study investigates the effects of struvite (STR), struvite with ammonium sulphate (STR + N), and commercial ammonium phosphate (AP) on the yields, nutrient concentration in the crops, nutrient uptake by the crops, and soil N, P, and Mg content in the second growing period after the application of fertilisers to silty loam (SL) and loamy sand (LS) soils under grass cultivation. Struvite was recovered from the liquid fraction of digestate obtained from a bio-refinery on the De Marke farm (Netherlands). The soils investigated in the pot experiment originated from Obory (SL) and Skierniewice (LS) (Central Poland). The results obtained over the first growing period following fertilisation were published earlier. In our prior work, we showed that the majority of the struvite phosphorus remains in the soil. We hypothesised that, in the second year, the yield potential of the struvite might be higher than that of commercial P fertiliser. Currently, we have demonstrated that, in the second growing period following the application, struvite causes an increase in grass yield, nutrient uptake by the crops, and P and Mg content in the soil. On SL and LS soils, the yields of the four grass harvests from the STR and STR + N treatments were higher than those from AP by approximately 8% and 16.5%, respectively. Our results confirm that struvite is more effective as a fertiliser compared to commercial ammonium phosphate. Struvite can be, therefore, recommended for fertilising grasslands at higher doses once every two years.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Szymańska & Tomasz Sosulski & Adriana Bożętka & Urszula Dawidowicz & Adam Wąs & Ewa Szara & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Piotr Sulewski & Gijs W. P. van Pruissen & René L. Cornelissen, 2020. "Evaluating the Struvite Recovered from Anaerobic Digestate in a Farm Bio-Refinery as a Slow-Release Fertiliser," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5342-:d:427589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5342/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5342/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ekaterina Ovsyannikova & Andrea Kruse & Gero C. Becker, 2020. "Feedstock-Dependent Phosphate Recovery in a Pilot-Scale Hydrothermal Liquefaction Bio-Crude Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Anne P. M. Velenturf & Phil Purnell, 2017. "Resource Recovery from Waste: Restoring the Balance between Resource Scarcity and Waste Overload," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Magdalena Szymańska & Ewa Szara & Adam Wąs & Tomasz Sosulski & Gijs W.P. van Pruissen & René L. Cornelissen, 2019. "Struvite—An Innovative Fertilizer from Anaerobic Digestate Produced in a Bio-Refinery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-9, January.
    4. Arif Reza & Soomin Shim & Seungsoo Kim & Naveed Ahmed & Seunggun Won & Changsix Ra, 2019. "Nutrient Leaching Loss of Pre-Treated Struvite and Its Application in Sudan Grass Cultivation as an Eco-Friendly and Sustainable Fertilizer Source," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Andrea Ehmann & Inga-Mareike Bach & Sukhanes Laopeamthong & Jennifer Bilbao & Iris Lewandowski, 2017. "Can Phosphate Salts Recovered from Manure Replace Conventional Phosphate Fertilizer?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Magdalena Szymańska & Ewa Szara & Tomasz Sosulski & Adam Wąs & Gijs W. P. Van Pruissen & René L. Cornelissen & Mieczysław Borowik & Marcin Konkol, 2019. "A Bio-Refinery Concept for N and P Recovery—A Chance for Biogas Plant Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, January.
    7. Shoghi Kalkhoran, Sanaz & Pannell, David J. & Thamo, Tas & White, Benedict & Polyakov, Maksym, 2019. "Soil acidity, lime application, nitrogen fertility, and greenhouse gas emissions: Optimizing their joint economic management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Szymańska & Tomasz Sosulski & Ewa Szara & Adam Wąs & Piotr Sulewski & Gijs W.P. van Pruissen & René L. Cornelissen, 2019. "Ammonium Sulphate from a Bio-Refinery System as a Fertilizer—Agronomic and Economic Effectiveness on the Farm Scale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Sanaz Shoghi Kalkhoran & David Pannell & Maksym Polyakov & Ben White & Morteza Chalak Haghighi & Amin William Mugera & Imma Farre, 2021. "A dynamic model of optimal lime application for wheat production in Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(2), pages 472-490, April.
    3. Mehnaz Mosharrof & Md. Kamal Uddin & Muhammad Firdaus Sulaiman & Shamim Mia & Shordar M. Shamsuzzaman & Ahmad Numery Ashfaqul Haque, 2021. "Combined Application of Rice Husk Biochar and Lime Increases Phosphorus Availability and Maize Yield in an Acidic Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Jennifer Keahey, 2021. "Sustainable Development and Participatory Action Research: A Systematic Review," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 291-306, June.
    5. Hong-Duck Ryu & Do Young Lim & Sun-Jung Kim & Un-Il Baek & Eu Gene Chung & Kyunghyun Kim & Jae Kwan Lee, 2020. "Struvite Precipitation for Sustainable Recovery of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Anaerobic Digestion Effluents of Swine Manure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Siwal, Samarjeet Singh & Zhang, Qibo & Devi, Nishu & Saini, Adesh Kumar & Saini, Vipin & Pareek, Bhawna & Gaidukovs, Sergejs & Thakur, Vijay Kumar, 2021. "Recovery processes of sustainable energy using different biomass and wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Mijung Kim & Soomin Shim & Arif Reza & Seungsoo Kim & Seunggun Won & Baedong Jung & Jinsoo Kim & Changsix Ra, 2019. "Evaluation of Struvite Recovered from Swine Wastewater as an Alternative Phosphorus Source in Broiler Feed," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-11, October.
    8. Judith M. Herbst, 2023. "Transforming Trash into Treasure Troves: SMEs Co-Create Industrial Ecology Ecosystems with Government," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Sebastian Awiszus & Klaus Meissner & Sebastian Reyer & Joachim Müller, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of a Bio-Refinery Concept Comprising Biogas Production, Lactic Acid Extraction and Plant Nutrient Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Ungerman Otakar & Dědková Jaroslava, 2021. "Current Implementation of the Circular Economy in Enterprises in the Czech Republic," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 21(2), pages 189-210, June.
    11. Marcin Sońta & Andrzej Łozicki & Magdalena Szymańska & Tomasz Sosulski & Ewa Szara & Adam Wąs & Gijs W. P. van Pruissen & René L. Cornelissen, 2020. "Duckweed from a Biorefinery System: Nutrient Recovery Efficiency and Forage Value," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Magdalena Szymańska & Ewa Szara & Adam Wąs & Tomasz Sosulski & Gijs W.P. van Pruissen & René L. Cornelissen, 2019. "Struvite—An Innovative Fertilizer from Anaerobic Digestate Produced in a Bio-Refinery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-9, January.
    13. Afifi Akhiar & Felipe Guilayn & Michel Torrijos & Audrey Battimelli & Abd Halim Shamsuddin & Hélène Carrère, 2021. "Correlations between the Composition of Liquid Fraction of Full-Scale Digestates and Process Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Anne P. M. Velenturf & Phil Purnell & Mike Tregent & John Ferguson & Alan Holmes, 2018. "Co-Producing a Vision and Approach for the Transition towards a Circular Economy: Perspectives from Government Partners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Mobolaji B. Shemfe & Siddharth Gadkari & Jhuma Sadhukhan, 2018. "Social Hotspot Analysis and Trade Policy Implications of the Use of Bioelectrochemical Systems for Resource Recovery from Wastewater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    16. Inga-Mareike Bach & Lisa Essich & Andrea Bauerle & Torsten Müller, 2022. "Efficiency of Phosphorus Fertilizers Derived from Recycled Biogas Digestate as Applied to Maize and Ryegrass in Soils with Different pH," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Vanesa Zorrilla-Muñoz & Marc Petz & María Silveria Agulló-Tomás, 2021. "GARCH model to estimate the impact of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions per sociodemographic factors and CAP in Spain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4675-4697, March.
    18. Camilo-A. Vargas-Terranova & Javier Rodrigo-Ilarri & María-Elena Rodrigo-Clavero & Miguel-A. Rozo-Arango, 2022. "M-GRCT: A Dynamic Circular Economy Model for the Optimal Design of Waste Management Systems in Low-Income Municipalities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-25, February.
    19. Otakar Ungerman & Jaroslava Dědková, 2020. "Model of the circular economy and its application in business practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3407-3432, April.
    20. Tat Dat Bui & Mohd Helmi Ali & Feng Ming Tsai & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Ming-Lang Tseng & Ming K Lim, 2020. "Challenges and Trends in Sustainable Corporate Finance: A Bibliometric Systematic Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5342-:d:427589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.