IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i19p5152-d423184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of New Anomaly Detection Technique for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring Using Gearbox SCADA Data

Author

Listed:
  • Conor McKinnon

    (Wind and Marine Energy Systems CDT, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • James Carroll

    (Wind and Marine Energy Systems CDT, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • Alasdair McDonald

    (Wind and Marine Energy Systems CDT, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • Sofia Koukoura

    (Wind and Marine Energy Systems CDT, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • David Infield

    (Wind and Marine Energy Systems CDT, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • Conaill Soraghan

    (Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

Abstract

Anomaly detection for wind turbine condition monitoring is an active area of research within the wind energy operations and maintenance (O & M) community. In this paper three models were compared for multi-megawatt operational wind turbine SCADA data. The models used for comparison were One-Class Support Vector Machine (OCSVM), Isolation Forest (IF), and Elliptical Envelope (EE). Each of these were compared for the same fault, and tested under various different data configurations. IF and EE have not previously been used for fault detection for wind turbines, and OCSVM has not been used for SCADA data. This paper presents a novel method of condition monitoring that only requires two months of data per turbine. These months were separated by a year, the first being healthy and the second unhealthy. The number of anomalies is compared, with a greater number in the unhealthy month being considered correct. It was found that for accuracy IF and OCSVM had similar performances in both training regimes presented. OCSVM performed better for generic training, and IF performed better for specific training. Overall, IF and OCSVM had an average accuracy of 82% for all configurations considered, compared to 77% for EE.

Suggested Citation

  • Conor McKinnon & James Carroll & Alasdair McDonald & Sofia Koukoura & David Infield & Conaill Soraghan, 2020. "Comparison of New Anomaly Detection Technique for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring Using Gearbox SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5152-:d:423184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5152/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5152/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angel Gil & Miguel A. Sanz-Bobi & Miguel A. Rodríguez-López, 2018. "Behavior Anomaly Indicators Based on Reference Patterns—Application to the Gearbox and Electrical Generator of a Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Zhao, Hongshan & Liu, Huihai & Hu, Wenjing & Yan, Xihui, 2018. "Anomaly detection and fault analysis of wind turbine components based on deep learning network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 825-834.
    3. Nielsen, Jannie Jessen & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2011. "On risk-based operation and maintenance of offshore wind turbine components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 218-229.
    4. Qu, Fuming & Liu, Jinhai & Zhu, Hongfei & Zhou, Bowen, 2020. "Wind turbine fault detection based on expanded linguistic terms and rules using non-singleton fuzzy logic," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    5. Yonglong Yan & Jian Li & David Wenzhong Gao, 2014. "Condition Parameter Modeling for Anomaly Detection in Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davide Astolfi & Francesco Castellani & Andrea Lombardi & Ludovico Terzi, 2021. "Multivariate SCADA Data Analysis Methods for Real-World Wind Turbine Power Curve Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Jersson X. Leon-Medina & Francesc Pozo, 2023. "Moving towards Preventive Maintenance in Wind Turbine Structural Control and Health Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-4, March.
    3. Yolanda Vidal, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-4, February.
    4. Mingzhu Tang & Zixin Liang & Huawei Wu & Zimin Wang, 2021. "Fault Diagnosis Method for Wind Turbine Gearboxes Based on IWOA-RF," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Alan Turnbull & Conor McKinnon & James Carrol & Alasdair McDonald, 2022. "On the Development of Offshore Wind Turbine Technology: An Assessment of Reliability Rates and Fault Detection Methods in a Changing Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Conor McKinnon & James Carroll & Alasdair McDonald & Sofia Koukoura & Charlie Plumley, 2021. "Investigation of Isolation Forest for Wind Turbine Pitch System Condition Monitoring Using SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Bruce Stephen, 2022. "Machine Learning Applications in Power System Condition Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-2, March.
    8. Xiao Wang & Zheng Zheng & Guoqian Jiang & Qun He & Ping Xie, 2022. "Detecting Wind Turbine Blade Icing with a Multiscale Long Short-Term Memory Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Junshuai Yan & Yongqian Liu & Xiaoying Ren, 2023. "An Early Fault Detection Method for Wind Turbine Main Bearings Based on Self-Attention GRU Network and Binary Segmentation Changepoint Detection Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Conor McKinnon & James Carroll & Alasdair McDonald & Sofia Koukoura & Charlie Plumley, 2021. "Investigation of Isolation Forest for Wind Turbine Pitch System Condition Monitoring Using SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    3. Wang, Anqi & Pei, Yan & Qian, Zheng & Zareipour, Hamidreza & Jing, Bo & An, Jiayi, 2022. "A two-stage anomaly decomposition scheme based on multi-variable correlation extraction for wind turbine fault detection and identification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    4. Feng, Chenlong & Liu, Chao & Jiang, Dongxiang, 2023. "Unsupervised anomaly detection using graph neural networks integrated with physical-statistical feature fusion and local-global learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 309-323.
    5. Xiang, Ling & Yang, Xin & Hu, Aijun & Su, Hao & Wang, Penghe, 2022. "Condition monitoring and anomaly detection of wind turbine based on cascaded and bidirectional deep learning networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    6. Aleksandra Grzesiek & Radosław Zimroz & Paweł Śliwiński & Norbert Gomolla & Agnieszka Wyłomańska, 2021. "A Method for Structure Breaking Point Detection in Engine Oil Pressure Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Moghaddass, Ramin & Sheng, Shuangwen, 2019. "An anomaly detection framework for dynamic systems using a Bayesian hierarchical framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 561-582.
    8. Sadeghian, Omid & Mohammadpour Shotorbani, Amin & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam & Sadiq, Rehan & Hewage, Kasun, 2021. "Risk-averse maintenance scheduling of generation units in combined heat and power systems with demand response," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Jin, Xin & Zhang, Zhaolong & Shi, Xiaoqiang & Ju, Wenbin, 2014. "A review on wind power industry and corresponding insurance market in China: Current status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1069-1082.
    10. Peng Sun & Jian Li & Junsheng Chen & Xiao Lei, 2016. "A Short-Term Outage Model of Wind Turbines with Doubly Fed Induction Generators Based on Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Li, Yan-Fu & Zio, Enrico, 2012. "A multi-state model for the reliability assessment of a distributed generation system via universal generating function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 28-36.
    12. Jia Tian & Xingqin Zhang & Shuangqing Zheng & Zhiyong Liu & Changshu Zhan, 2024. "Synergising an Advanced Optimisation Technique with Deep Learning: A Novel Method in Fault Warning Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, April.
    13. Alejandro Blanco-M. & Karina Gibert & Pere Marti-Puig & Jordi Cusidó & Jordi Solé-Casals, 2018. "Identifying Health Status of Wind Turbines by Using Self Organizing Maps and Interpretation-Oriented Post-Processing Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Leimeister, Mareike & Kolios, Athanasios, 2018. "A review of reliability-based methods for risk analysis and their application in the offshore wind industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1065-1076.
    15. Jin, Xin & Ju, Wenbin & Zhang, Zhaolong & Guo, Lianxin & Yang, Xiangang, 2016. "System safety analysis of large wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1293-1307.
    16. Mingzhu Tang & Wei Chen & Qi Zhao & Huawei Wu & Wen Long & Bin Huang & Lida Liao & Kang Zhang, 2019. "Development of an SVR Model for the Fault Diagnosis of Large-Scale Doubly-Fed Wind Turbines Using SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, September.
    17. Cristian Velandia-Cardenas & Yolanda Vidal & Francesc Pozo, 2021. "Wind Turbine Fault Detection Using Highly Imbalanced Real SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    18. Sun, Shilin & Wang, Tianyang & Chu, Fulei, 2022. "In-situ condition monitoring of wind turbine blades: A critical and systematic review of techniques, challenges, and futures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Soua, Slim & Van Lieshout, Paul & Perera, Asanka & Gan, Tat-Hean & Bridge, Bryan, 2013. "Determination of the combined vibrational and acoustic emission signature of a wind turbine gearbox and generator shaft in service as a pre-requisite for effective condition monitoring," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 175-181.
    20. Zhang, Chen & Yang, Tao, 2021. "Optimal maintenance planning and resource allocation for wind farms based on non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-ΙΙ," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1540-1549.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5152-:d:423184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.