IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i18p4960-d417078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gasification of Cup Plant ( Silphium perfoliatum L.) Biomass–Energy Recovery and Environmental Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Koniuszy

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Pawla VI 1, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Hawrot-Paw

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Pawla VI 1, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Cezary Podsiadło

    (Department of Agroengineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Pawla VI 3, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Paweł Sędłak

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Pawla VI 1, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Ewa Możdżer

    (Department of Environment Management, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Slowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Biomass from cup plant ( Silphium perfoliatum L.) is considered a renewable energy source that can be converted into alternative fuel. Calorific syngas, a promising type of advanced fuel, can be produced through thermochemical biomass gasification. In this study, the suitability of cup plant biomass for gasification was assessed, including the process energy balance and environmental impacts of waste from syngas purification. Silphium perfoliatum L. was cultivated as a gasification feedstock in different conditions (irrigation, fertilization). The experiments were performed in a membrane gasifier. All obtained energy parameters were compared to the biomass yield per hectare. The toxic effects of liquid waste were assessed using tests analyzing germination/seed root elongation of Sinapsis alba . Leachates collected from condensation tanks of a gas generator were introduced to soil at the following doses: 100, 1000 and 10,000 mg kg −1 DM of soil. The usefulness of Silphium perfoliatum L. for gasification was confirmed. The factors of plant cultivation affected the biomass yield, the volume and calorific value of syngas and the amount of biochar. It was determined that the components found in condensates demonstrate a phytotoxic effect, restricting or inhibiting germination and root elongation of Sinapsis alba . Due to this potential hazard, the possibility of its release to the environment should be limited. Most of the biomass is only used for heating purposes, but the syngas obtained from the cup plant can be used to power cogeneration systems, which, apart from heat, also generate electricity.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Koniuszy & Małgorzata Hawrot-Paw & Cezary Podsiadło & Paweł Sędłak & Ewa Możdżer, 2020. "Gasification of Cup Plant ( Silphium perfoliatum L.) Biomass–Energy Recovery and Environmental Impacts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4960-:d:417078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4960/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4960/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srirangan, Kajan & Akawi, Lamees & Moo-Young, Murray & Chou, C. Perry, 2012. "Towards sustainable production of clean energy carriers from biomass resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 172-186.
    2. Situmorang, Yohanes Andre & Zhao, Zhongkai & Yoshida, Akihiro & Abudula, Abuliti & Guan, Guoqing, 2020. "Small-scale biomass gasification systems for power generation (<200 kW class): A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Ajay Kumar & David D. Jones & Milford A. Hanna, 2009. "Thermochemical Biomass Gasification: A Review of the Current Status of the Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Stanislaw Szwaja & Anna Poskart & Monika Zajemska & Magdalena Szwaja, 2019. "Theoretical and Experimental Analysis on Co-Gasification of Sewage Sludge with Energetic Crops," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anita Konieczna & Kamil Roman & Witold Rzodkiewicz, 2023. "Fuel Consumption, Emissions of Air Pollutants and Opportunities for Reducing CO 2 Emissions from Linear Sources in the Model Rural Municipality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Rolandas Paulauskas & Kęstutis Zakarauskas & Nerijus Striūgas, 2021. "An Intensification of Biomass and Waste Char Gasification in a Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Anita Konieczna & Kamila Mazur & Adam Koniuszy & Andrzej Gawlik & Igor Sikorski, 2022. "Thermal Energy and Exhaust Emissions of a Gasifier Stove Feeding Pine and Hemp Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reyes, Y.A. & Pérez, M. & Barrera, E.L. & Martínez, Y. & Cheng, K.K., 2022. "Thermochemical conversion processes of Dichrostachys cinerea as a biofuel: A review of the Cuban case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Janajreh, Isam & Adeyemi, Idowu & Raza, Syed Shabbar & Ghenai, Chaouki, 2021. "A review of recent developments and future prospects in gasification systems and their modeling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Díaz González, Carlos A. & Pacheco Sandoval, Leonardo, 2020. "Sustainability aspects of biomass gasification systems for small power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Xia Liu & Juntao Wei & Wei Huo & Guangsuo Yu, 2017. "Gasification under CO 2 –Steam Mixture: Kinetic Model Study Based on Shared Active Sites," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-10, November.
    5. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    6. Bauer, Fredric & Hulteberg, Christian, 2014. "Isobutanol from glycerine – A techno-economic evaluation of a new biofuel production process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 261-268.
    7. Zhang, Zhiyuan & Wang, Xutao & Zhang, Lilin & Zhou, Hengtao & Ju, Rui & Rao, Peijun & Guo, Xiaoyu & Han, Yaqian & Chen, Hongwei, 2022. "Characteristics of steel slag as an oxygen carrier for chemical looping gasification of sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    8. López-González, D. & Puig-Gamero, M. & Acién, F.G. & García-Cuadra, F. & Valverde, J.L. & Sanchez-Silva, L., 2015. "Energetic, economic and environmental assessment of the pyrolysis and combustion of microalgae and their oils," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1752-1770.
    9. Shan Gu & Maosheng Liu & Xiaoye Liang, 2024. "Analysis of Operational Problems and Improvement Measures for Biomass-Circulating Fluidized Bed Gasifiers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-11, January.
    10. David Bannon & Mirka Deza & Masoud Masoumi & Bahareh Estejab, 2023. "Assessment of Irregular Biomass Particles Fluidization in Bubbling Fluidized Beds," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Gabbrielli, Roberto & Barontini, Federica & Frigo, Stefano & Bressan, Luigi, 2022. "Numerical analysis of bio-methane production from biomass-sewage sludge oxy-steam gasification and methanation process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    12. Neves, Renato Cruz & Klein, Bruno Colling & da Silva, Ricardo Justino & Rezende, Mylene Cristina Alves Ferreira & Funke, Axel & Olivarez-Gómez, Edgardo & Bonomi, Antonio & Maciel-Filho, Rubens, 2020. "A vision on biomass-to-liquids (BTL) thermochemical routes in integrated sugarcane biorefineries for biojet fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Burra, K.G. & Hussein, M.S. & Amano, R.S. & Gupta, A.K., 2016. "Syngas evolutionary behavior during chicken manure pyrolysis and air gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 408-415.
    14. Wang, Gang & Zhang, Zhen & Lin, Jianqing, 2024. "Multi-energy complementary power systems based on solar energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    15. Adnan, Muflih A. & Hossain, Mohammad M. & Kibria, Md Golam, 2020. "Biomass upgrading to high-value chemicals via gasification and electrolysis: A thermodynamic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1367-1379.
    16. María Pilar González-Vázquez & Roberto García & Covadonga Pevida & Fernando Rubiera, 2017. "Optimization of a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Plant for Low-Temperature Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Pongrácz, Eva & Fabritius, Timo, 2013. "The potential of using biomass-based reducing agents in the blast furnace: A review of thermochemical conversion technologies and assessments related to sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 511-528.
    18. Carvalho, Lara & Furusjö, Erik & Ma, Chunyan & Ji, Xiaoyan & Lundgren, Joakim & Hedlund, Jonas & Grahn, Mattias & Öhrman, Olov G.W. & Wetterlund, Elisabeth, 2018. "Alkali enhanced biomass gasification with in situ S capture and a novel syngas cleaning. Part 2: Techno-economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 471-482.
    19. Seckin, Candeniz & Bayulken, Ahmet R., 2013. "Extended Exergy Accounting (EEA) analysis of municipal wastewater treatment – Determination of environmental remediation cost for municipal wastewater," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 55-64.
    20. Arodudu, Oludunsin Tunrayo & Helming, Katharina & Voinov, Alexey & Wiggering, Hubert, 2017. "Integrating agronomic factors into energy efficiency assessment of agro-bioenergy production – A case study of ethanol and biogas production from maize feedstock," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 426-439.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4960-:d:417078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.