IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i18p4742-d412186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Electric Vehicle Charging Considering the Effects of a Financial Incentive on Battery Ageing

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Steffen

    (Epinal Way, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Ashley Fly

    (Epinal Way, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK)

  • William Mitchell

    (Epinal Way, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK)

Abstract

As the market share of electric vehicles increases, the intermittent load on the electricity grid due to charging will increase. This can be counteracted by Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) which utilises dormant electric vehicles to feed power into the grid, generating income for the vehicle owner while relieving load across the grid. However, increased battery use through V2G can negatively affect battery health. In this work, a computational model of an electric vehicle with battery degradation is used to investigate the relationship of these effects. The analysis was conducted at the top level of detail, only considering the battery pack of the vehicle. The findings of this investigation show that the cost relating to battery degradation is smaller than the potential profit available from Vehicle-to-Grid over a three-year period. However, the benefit does not seem to be enough to justify the upfront investment requirement, and further financial incentives, such as net billing, may be required to make V2G economically viable. Future development within this field is vital for the success of the electric vehicle within the automotive markets, and for the transition to a renewable energy grid.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Steffen & Ashley Fly & William Mitchell, 2020. "Optimal Electric Vehicle Charging Considering the Effects of a Financial Incentive on Battery Ageing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4742-:d:412186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4742/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4742/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tarroja, Brian & Zhang, Li & Wifvat, Van & Shaffer, Brendan & Samuelsen, Scott, 2016. "Assessing the stationary energy storage equivalency of vehicle-to-grid charging battery electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 673-690.
    2. Parsons, George R. & Hidrue, Michael K. & Kempton, Willett & Gardner, Meryl P., 2014. "Willingness to pay for vehicle-to-grid (V2G) electric vehicles and their contract terms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 313-324.
    3. Schoch, Jennifer & Gaerttner, Johannes & Schuller, Alexander & Setzer, Thomas, 2018. "Enhancing electric vehicle sustainability through battery life optimal charging," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-18.
    4. Fernández, I.J. & Calvillo, C.F. & Sánchez-Miralles, A. & Boal, J., 2013. "Capacity fade and aging models for electric batteries and optimal charging strategy for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 35-43.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Ahsan Khan & Akhtar Hussain & Woon-Gyu Lee & Hak-Man Kim, 2023. "An Incentive-Based Mechanism to Enhance Energy Trading among Microgrids, EVs, and Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Junhyung Kim & Jinho Kim & Hwanmin Jeong, 2022. "Key Parameters for Economic Valuation of V2G Applied to Ancillary Service: Data-Driven Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-12, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tarroja, Brian & Hittinger, Eric, 2021. "The value of consumer acceptance of controlled electric vehicle charging in a decarbonizing grid: The case of California," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. Cai, Yishan & Yang, Lin & Deng, Zhongwei & Zhao, Xiaowei & Deng, Hao, 2018. "Online identification of lithium-ion battery state-of-health based on fast wavelet transform and cross D-Markov machine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 621-635.
    4. Géremi Gilson Dranka & Paula Ferreira, 2020. "Electric Vehicles and Biofuels Synergies in the Brazilian Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Al-Falahi, Monaaf D.A. & Jayasinghe, Shantha D.G. & Enshaei, Hossein, 2019. "Hybrid algorithm for optimal operation of hybrid energy systems in electric ferries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Kim, Junghun & Seung, Hyunchan & Lee, Jongsu & Ahn, Joongha, 2020. "Asymmetric preference and loss aversion for electric vehicles: The reference-dependent choice model capturing different preference directions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Wadim Strielkowski & Dalia Streimikiene & Alena Fomina & Elena Semenova, 2019. "Internet of Energy (IoE) and High-Renewables Electricity System Market Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Hegazy, Omar & Barrero, Ricardo & Van den Bossche, Peter & El Baghdadi, Mohamed & Smekens, Jelle & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Vriens, Wouter & Bogaerts, Bruno, 2016. "Modeling, analysis and feasibility study of new drivetrain architectures for off-highway vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1056-1074.
    9. Ozkurt, Celil & Camci, Fatih & Atamuradov, Vepa & Odorry, Christopher, 2016. "Integration of sampling based battery state of health estimation method in electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 356-367.
    10. Binghong Han & Jonathon R. Harding & Johanna K. S. Goodman & Zhuhua Cai & Quinn C. Horn, 2022. "End-of-Charge Temperature Rise and State-of-Health Evaluation of Aged Lithium-Ion Battery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Lefeng, Shi & Shengnan, Lv & Chunxiu, Liu & Yue, Zhou & Cipcigan, Liana & Acker, Thomas L., 2020. "A framework for electric vehicle power supply chain development," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Noel, Lance & Papu Carrone, Andrea & Jensen, Anders Fjendbo & Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo & Kester, Johannes & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2019. "Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid applications: A Nordic choice experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 525-534.
    13. Gerald Broneske & David Wozabal, 2017. "How Do Contract Parameters Influence the Economics of Vehicle-to-Grid?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 150-164, February.
    14. Codani, Paul & Perez, Yannick & Petit, Marc, 2016. "Financial shortfall for electric vehicles: Economic impacts of Transmission System Operators market designs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 422-431.
    15. Qiu, Y.Q. & Tsan Sheng Ng, Adam & Zhou, P., 2022. "Optimizing urban electric vehicle incentive policy mixes in China: Perspective of residential preference heterogeneity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    16. Rishabh Ghotge & Koen Philippe Nijssen & Jan Anne Annema & Zofia Lukszo, 2022. "Use before You Choose: What Do EV Drivers Think about V2G after Experiencing It?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Chen, Pengzhan & Liu, Mengchao & Chen, Chuanxi & Shang, Xin, 2019. "A battery management strategy in microgrid for personalized customer requirements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Hackbarth, André & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "Willingness-to-pay for alternative fuel vehicle characteristics: A stated choice study for Germany," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 89-111.
    19. Cohen, Jed & Azarova, Valeriya & Kollmann, Andrea & Reichl, Johannes, 2019. "Q-complementarity in household adoption of photovoltaics and electricity-intensive goods: The case of electric vehicles," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 567-577.
    20. Xu, Meng & Wang, Xia & Zhang, Liwen & Zhao, Peng, 2021. "Comparison of the effect of linear and two-step fast charging protocols on degradation of lithium ion batteries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4742-:d:412186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.