IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i13p3373-d379038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cogeneration Economics for Greenhouses in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Kalliopi Tataraki

    (Laboratory of Process Analysis and Design, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • Eugenia Giannini

    (Laboratory of Process Analysis and Design, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • Konstantinos Kavvadias

    (Laboratory of Process Analysis and Design, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • Zacharias Maroulis

    (Laboratory of Process Analysis and Design, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Cogeneration is a cost-effective technology, and modern greenhouses are considered one of the best applications for it due to their energy intensity. Taking into account that in such cases the production cost is significantly affected by the cost of energy, the potential of combined heat and power (CHP) has already been examined and proved in practice in some European countries, with the Netherlands being the most representative example. In this study, a comparative investigation of the greenhouse energy cost in all European countries is presented through the use of a combined cooling heat and power (CCHP) system. Using actual historical data spanning a decade, a total overview of the European level is given regarding greenhouse thermal requirements and CCHP energy costs for the cultivation of products with an accepted temperature cultivation range 20 ± 5 °C. By consulting (a) the available daily historical meteorological data for the 2008–2018 period, (b) the recorded actual electricity and natural gas prices for the 2008–2018 period, and (c) the technical characteristics of the CCHP system, the annual heating and cooling requirements of greenhouses are determined for all EU countries. Assuming a cogeneration unit with an internal combustion engine (ICE) as a prime mover, as well as a single-effect absorption chiller for the production of useful cooling, the unitary cost of energy is estimated along with the annual cost for heating and cooling per unit cultivation area. Using this methodology, the economic efficiency of cogeneration in greenhouses is assessed for the selected 10-year period, allowing the identification of the countries that benefit the most from this technology. The results indicate that the spark ratio (e.g., the electricity to natural gas price ratio) is the most crucial parameter for greenhouse costs. For countries where the ratio is larger than 3, greenhouses can even result in an extra cashflow instead of energy expenditures. The most favorable conditions for cogeneration use were found in Italy and the United Kingdom with an average spark ratio more than 4, resulting in an annual total cost of heating energy close to −7 €/m 2 per year. On the other hand, cogeneration proved not to be a cost-efficient system in Sweden and Finland as a result of significantly high greenhouse energy requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalliopi Tataraki & Eugenia Giannini & Konstantinos Kavvadias & Zacharias Maroulis, 2020. "Cogeneration Economics for Greenhouses in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3373-:d:379038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3373/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3373/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, Surendra & Mittal, J. P. & Singh, M. P. & Bakhshi, R., 1988. "Energy-use patterns under various farming systems in Punjab," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 261-268.
    2. Mohammadi, Ali & Omid, Mahmoud, 2010. "Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 191-196, January.
    3. Singh, Satwinder & Singh, Surendra & Pannu, C. J. S. & Singh, Jasdev, 1999. "Energy input and yield relations for wheat in different agro-climatic zones of the Punjab," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 287-298, August.
    4. Çetin, Bahattin & Vardar, Ali, 2008. "An economic analysis of energy requirements and input costs for tomato production in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 428-433.
    5. Ozkan, Burhan & Fert, Cemal & Karadeniz, C. Feyza, 2007. "Energy and cost analysis for greenhouse and open-field grape production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1500-1504.
    6. Jradi, M. & Riffat, S., 2014. "Tri-generation systems: Energy policies, prime movers, cooling technologies, configurations and operation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 396-415.
    7. Moreton, O.R. & Rowley, P.N., 2012. "The feasibility of biomass CHP as an energy and CO2 source for commercial glasshouses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 339-346.
    8. Adaro, Jorge A. & Galimberti, Pablo D. & Lema, Alba I. & Fasulo, Amílcar & Barral, Jorge R., 1999. "Geothermal contribution to greenhouse heating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-4), pages 241-249, September.
    9. Tataraki, Kalliopi G. & Kavvadias, Konstantinos C. & Maroulis, Zacharias B., 2019. "Combined cooling heating and power systems in greenhouses. Grassroots and retrofit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Esengun, Kemal & Erdal, Gülistan & Gündüz, Orhan & Erdal, Hilmi, 2007. "An economic analysis and energy use in stake-tomato production in Tokat province of Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 1873-1881.
    11. Yilmaz, Ibrahim & Akcaoz, Handan & Ozkan, Burhan, 2005. "An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 145-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiara Bersani & Marco Fossa & Antonella Priarone & Roberto Sacile & Enrico Zero, 2021. "Model Predictive Control versus Traditional Relay Control in a High Energy Efficiency Greenhouse," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Eugenia Giannini, 2022. "Cogeneration Economics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-4, July.
    3. Urbano, Eva M. & Martinez-Viol, Victor & Kampouropoulos, Konstantinos & Romeral, Luis, 2022. "Risk assessment of energy investment in the industrial framework – Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis for energy design and operation optimisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    4. Liting Zhang & Weijun Gao & Yongwen Yang & Fanyue Qian, 2020. "Impacts of Investment Cost, Energy Prices and Carbon Tax on Promoting the Combined Cooling, Heating and Power (CCHP) System of an Amusement Park Resort in Shanghai," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Anna-Maria N. Dimitropoulou & Vasileios Z. Maroulis & Eugenia N. Giannini, 2023. "A Simple and Effective Model for Predicting the Thermal Energy Requirements of Greenhouses in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-27, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammadi, Ali & Omid, Mahmoud, 2010. "Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 191-196, January.
    2. Samavatean, Naeimeh & Rafiee, Shahin & Mobli, Hossein & Mohammadi, Ali, 2011. "An analysis of energy use and relation between energy inputs and yield, costs and income of garlic production in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1808-1813.
    3. Pishgar Komleh, S.H. & Keyhani, A. & Rafiee, Sh. & Sefeedpary, P., 2011. "Energy use and economic analysis of corn silage production under three cultivated area levels in Tehran province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3335-3341.
    4. Zangeneh, Morteza & Omid, Mahmoud & Akram, Asadollah, 2010. "A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamadan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 2927-2933.
    5. Elsoragaby, Suha & Yahya, Azmi & Mahadi, Muhammad Razif & Nawi, Nazmi Mat & Mairghany, Modather, 2019. "Energy utilization in major crop cultivation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1285-1303.
    6. Pishgar-Komleh, S.H. & Sefeedpari, P. & Rafiee, S., 2011. "Energy and economic analysis of rice production under different farm levels in Guilan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5824-5831.
    7. Pahlavan, Reza & Omid, Mahmoud & Akram, Asadollah, 2011. "Energy use efficiency in greenhouse tomato production in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 6714-6719.
    8. Castoldi, Nicola & Bechini, Luca & Ferrante, Antonio, 2011. "Fossil energy usage for the production of baby leaves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 86-93.
    9. Plappally, A.K. & Lienhard V, J.H., 2012. "Energy requirements for water production, treatment, end use, reclamation, and disposal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4818-4848.
    10. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    11. Pishgar-Komleh, Seyyed Hassan & Keyhani, Alireza & Mostofi-Sarkari, Mohammad Reza & Jafari, Ali, 2012. "Energy and economic analysis of different seed corn harvesting systems in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 469-476.
    12. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Rafiee, Shahin & Omid, Mahmoud & Yousefi, Marziye & Movahedi, Mehran, 2013. "Modeling of energy consumption and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in wheat production in Esfahan province of Iran using artificial neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 333-338.
    13. Tabatabaie, Seyed Mohammad Hossein & Rafiee, Shahin & Keyhani, Alireza & Heidari, Mohammad Davoud, 2013. "Energy use pattern and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs and input costs for pear production in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 7-12.
    14. Kuswardhani, Nita & Soni, Peeyush & Shivakoti, Ganesh P., 2013. "Comparative energy input–output and financial analyses of greenhouse and open field vegetables production in West Java, Indonesia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 83-92.
    15. Hamedani, Sara Rajabi & Shabani, Zeinab & Rafiee, Shahin, 2011. "Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in potato production in Hamadan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2367-2371.
    16. Mohammadi, Ali & Rafiee, Shahin & Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid & Rafiee, Hamed, 2010. "Energy inputs – yield relationship and cost analysis of kiwifruit production in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 1071-1075.
    17. Rajabi Hamedani, Sara & Keyhani, Alireza & Alimardani, Reza, 2011. "Energy use patterns and econometric models of grape production in Hamadan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6345-6351.
    18. Pérez-Alonso, J. & Pérez-García, M. & Pasamontes-Romera, M. & Callejón-Ferre, A.J., 2012. "Performance analysis and neural modelling of a greenhouse integrated photovoltaic system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4675-4685.
    19. R. Fadavi & A. Keyhani & S.S. Mohtasebi, 2011. "An analysis of energy use, input costs and relation between energy inputs and yield of apple orchard," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(3), pages 88-96.
    20. Bojacá, Carlos Ricardo & Casilimas, Héctor Albeiro & Gil, Rodrigo & Schrevens, Eddie, 2012. "Extending the input–output energy balance methodology in agriculture through cluster analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 465-470.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3373-:d:379038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.