IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i12p3109-d372202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Rural Revitalization Strategy for Housing in Gully Regions of the Loess Plateau: Environmental Considerations

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Zhang

    (Innovation Institute for Sustainable Maritime Architecture Research and Technology, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China)

  • Qi Ding

    (Innovation Institute for Sustainable Maritime Architecture Research and Technology, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China)

  • Qinian Hu

    (Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 808-0135, Japan)

  • Bin Liu

    (School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Weijun Gao

    (Innovation Institute for Sustainable Maritime Architecture Research and Technology, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China)

  • Dian Zhou

    (School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Hiroatsu Fukuda

    (Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 808-0135, Japan)

Abstract

Under the background of Chinese Rural Revitalization Strategy, how to improve rural regional environment and living quality is very important and urgent. At present, residential buildings in gully regions of the Loess Plateau have poor insulation and high-energy consumption. Thus, better ecological design can largely save energy and improve living comfort. The findings of this paper provide an insight into the ecological design potentials for reducing energy demand across rural regions in China. In this paper, we select three main types of residential buildings in gully regions and build energy demand models based on the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. The results show that the energy demand in the building use stage is extremely high in all three typical buildings, which account for around 90% of the whole life cycle. The energy demand of the traditional adobe residential building is lower than the brick-concrete structure buildings. The LCA method used in this paper can quantify the energy demand in each stage of life cycle, which helps to put forward the corresponding ecological design strategy. The research results can be used as a reference in the future development of this region and other rural regions in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Zhang & Qi Ding & Qinian Hu & Bin Liu & Weijun Gao & Dian Zhou & Hiroatsu Fukuda, 2020. "Towards Rural Revitalization Strategy for Housing in Gully Regions of the Loess Plateau: Environmental Considerations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:12:p:3109-:d:372202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3109/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3109/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleftheriadis, Stathis & Mumovic, Dejan & Greening, Paul, 2017. "Life cycle energy efficiency in building structures: A review of current developments and future outlooks based on BIM capabilities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 811-825.
    2. Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi & Massimo Sargolini & Ilenia Pierantoni, 2019. "Climate Change Challenges to Existing Cultural Heritage Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-10, September.
    3. S. Soutullo & E. Giancola & M. J. Jiménez & J. A. Ferrer & M. N. Sánchez, 2020. "How Climate Trends Impact on the Thermal Performance of a Typical Residential Building in Madrid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deborah Arduin & Lucas Rosse Caldas & Rayane de Lima Moura Paiva & Fernando Rocha, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Earth Construction: A Systematic Literature Review Considering Five Construction Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-30, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirvani Dastgerdi, Ahmadreza & Sargolini, Massimo & Broussard Allred, Shorna & Chatrchyan, Allison Morrill & Drescher, Michael & DeGeer, Christopher, 2022. "Climate change risk reduction in cultural landscapes: Insights from Cinque Terre and Waterloo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Sánchez, M.N. & Soutullo, S. & Olmedo, R. & Bravo, D. & Castaño, S. & Jiménez, M.J., 2020. "An experimental methodology to assess the climate impact on the energy performance of buildings: A ten-year evaluation in temperate and cold desert areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    3. Silvia Soutullo & Emanuela Giancola & María Nuria Sánchez & José Antonio Ferrer & David García & María José Súarez & Jesús Ignacio Prieto & Elena Antuña-Yudego & Juan Luís Carús & Miguel Ángel Fernánd, 2020. "Methodology for Quantifying the Energy Saving Potentials Combining Building Retrofitting, Solar Thermal Energy and Geothermal Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Anita Naneva & Marcella Bonanomi & Alexander Hollberg & Guillaume Habert & Daniel Hall, 2020. "Integrated BIM-Based LCA for the Entire Building Process Using an Existing Structure for Cost Estimation in the Swiss Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Cellura, Maurizio & Guarino, Francesco & Longo, Sonia & Mistretta, Marina, 2017. "Modeling the energy and environmental life cycle of buildings: A co-simulation approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 733-742.
    6. Shadreck Muchaku & Grey Magaiza & Hamisai Hamandawana, 2023. "Translating Indigenous Knowledge into Actionable Climate-Change Adaption Strategies: A Case Study of Maluti-a-Phofung Local Municipality, Free State Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Gül Aktürk & Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi, 2021. "Cultural Landscapes under the Threat of Climate Change: A Systematic Study of Barriers to Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Najjar, Mohammad & Figueiredo, Karoline & Hammad, Ahmed W.A. & Haddad, Assed, 2019. "Integrated optimization with building information modeling and life cycle assessment for generating energy efficient buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1366-1382.
    9. Eun Soo Park & Hee Chang Seo, 2021. "Risk Analysis for Earthquake-Damaged Buildings Using Point Cloud and BIM Data: A Case Study of the Daeseong Apartment Complex in Pohang, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Agnieszka Ptak-Wojciechowska & Anna Januchta-Szostak & Agata Gawlak & Magda Matuszewska, 2021. "The Importance of Water and Climate-Related Aspects in the Quality of Urban Life Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.
    11. Jing Shen & Rung-Jiun Chou, 2021. "Cultural Landscape Development Integrated with Rural Revitalization: A Case Study of Songkou Ancient Town," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Shijie Peng & Olisa Phil-Ebosie, 2020. "Digital Twin Aided Sustainability and Vulnerability Audit for Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi & Reza Kheyroddin, 2022. "Policy Recommendations for Integrating Resilience into the Management of Cultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Francesco Masi & Donatella Porrini, 2021. "Cultural Heritage and natural disasters: the insurance choice of the Italian Cathedrals," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(3), pages 409-433, September.
    15. Alessandra Bonazza & Nico Bonora & Benjamin Duke & Daniele Spizzichino & Antonella Pasqua Recchia & Andrea Taramelli, 2022. "Copernicus in Support of Monitoring, Protection, and Management of Cultural and Natural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, February.
    16. Donatella Porrini & Francesco Masi, 2021. "Managing climate change risk: the case of the Italian Churches," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(3), pages 2619-2637, February.
    17. Angela Santangelo & Eleonora Melandri & Giulia Marzani & Simona Tondelli & Andrea Ugolini, 2022. "Enhancing Resilience of Cultural Heritage in Historical Areas: A Collection of Good Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.
    18. Zhang, Wenhao & Li, Honglian & Wang, Mengli & Lv, Wen & Huang, Jin & Yang, Liu, 2024. "Enhancing typical Meteorological Year generation for diverse energy systems: A hybrid Sandia-machine learning approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    19. Hans Antonson & Philip Buckland & Roger Nyqvist, 2021. "A society ill-equipped to deal with the effects of climate change on cultural heritage and landscape: a qualitative assessment of planning practices in transport infrastructure," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 1-22, May.
    20. George Halkos & Panagiotis Stavros Aslanidis & Angelos Plataniotis & Phoebe Koundouri, 2024. "Evaluating the Tangible and Intangible Parameters of Cultural Heritage: An Economic Meta-Analysis in a Global Context," DEOS Working Papers 2413, Athens University of Economics and Business.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:12:p:3109-:d:372202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.