IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i20p3860-d275710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing the Energy and Steam Consumption of SAGD Through Cyclic Solvent Co-Injection

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Manfre Jaimes

    (Department of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Ian D. Gates

    (Department of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Matthew Clarke

    (Department of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

Abstract

The amount of oil that is contained in the Canadian oil sands represent the third largest oil accumulation in the world. Approximately half of the daily oil production from the oil sands comes from mining processes and the other half is produced mostly using steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD). This method is effective at reducing the viscosity of the oil. However, the generation of steam requires a significant amount of energy. Thus, there is an ongoing effort to reduce the energy needed to produce oil from the oil sands. In this article the intermittent injection of a solvent, along with steam, is investigated as a means of reducing the amount of energy required to extract oil from the Canadian oil sands. A simulation-based study examined the effect of the type of solvent, the cycles’ duration, the solvent concentration and the number of cycles. The simulations covered a time span of 10 years during which several different solvents (methane, ethane, propane, butane, pentane, hexane, and CO 2 ) were injected under varying injection schedules. The solvents that were investigated are compounds that are likely to be readily available at a heavy oil production site. The solvent injection periods ranged from six to 24 months in length. The results reveal that SAGD combined with intermittent injection of hexane resulted in the most significant improvement to the cumulative oil production and in the cumulative energy-oil ratio (cEOR). Compared to SAGD without solvent injection, the cumulative oil production was increased by 45% and the cEOR was reduced by 23%. It was also seen that the performance of the proposed process is highly dependent on the resulting physical properties of the solvent-bitumen mixture. Finally, a simplified economic analysis also identified SAGD with intermittent hexane injection as the scheme that resulted in the highest net present value. Compared to SAGD without solvent injection, the intermittent injection of hexane led to an 85% increase in the net present value.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Manfre Jaimes & Ian D. Gates & Matthew Clarke, 2019. "Reducing the Energy and Steam Consumption of SAGD Through Cyclic Solvent Co-Injection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:20:p:3860-:d:275710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/20/3860/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/20/3860/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giacchetta, Giancarlo & Leporini, Mariella & Marchetti, Barbara, 2015. "Economic and environmental analysis of a Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) facility for oil recovery from Canadian oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Yuan Zhang & Jinghong Hu & Qi Zhang, 2019. "Simulation Study of CO 2 Huff-n-Puff in Tight Oil Reservoirs Considering Molecular Diffusion and Adsorption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diego Manfre Jaimes & Matthew Clarke, 2020. "Analytical Modeling of the Cyclic ES-SAGD Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Lin, Zeyu & Lu, Xinqian & Wang, Xiaoyan & Chang, Yuanhao & Kang, Kai & Zeng, Fanhua, 2024. "Effect of N2 impurity on CO2-based cyclic solvent injection process in enhancing heavy oil recovery and CO2 storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Wang, Jingyi & Gates, Ian D., 2021. "Time scales for steam injection and bitumen production in steam-assisted gravity drainage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jing & Zhang, Lisong & Yang, Feiyue & Sun, Luning, 2020. "Positive measure and potential implication for heavy oil recovery of dip reservoir using SAGD based on numerical analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Zhang, Lisong & Li, Jing & Sun, Luning & Yang, Feiyue, 2021. "An influence mechanism of shale barrier on heavy oil recovery using SAGD based on theoretical and numerical analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Khaled Enab & Hamid Emami-Meybodi, 2021. "Effects of Diffusion, Adsorption, and Hysteresis on Huff-n-Puff Performance in Ultratight Reservoirs with Different Fluid Types and Injection Gases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Rui, Zhenhua & Wang, Xiaoqing & Zhang, Zhien & Lu, Jun & Chen, Gang & Zhou, Xiyu & Patil, Shirish, 2018. "A realistic and integrated model for evaluating oil sands development with Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage technology in Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 76-91.
    5. Mikhail Turbakov & Аleksandr Shcherbakov, 2015. "Determination of Enhanced Oil Recovery Candidate Fields in the Volga-Ural Oil and Gas Region Territory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Sapkota, Krishna & Oni, Abayomi Olufemi & Kumar, Amit & Linwei, Ma, 2018. "The development of a techno-economic model for the extraction, transportation, upgrading, and shipping of Canadian oil sands products to the Asia-Pacific region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 273-292.
    7. Leporini, Mariella & Marchetti, Barbara & Corvaro, Francesco & Polonara, Fabio, 2019. "Reconversion of offshore oil and gas platforms into renewable energy sites production: Assessment of different scenarios," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1121-1132.
    8. Ahmadi, Mohammadali & Hou, Qingfeng & Wang, Yuanyuan & Lei, Xuantong & Liu, Benjieming & Chen, Zhangxin, 2023. "Spotlight on reversible emulsification and demulsification of tetradecane-water mixtures using CO2/N2 switchable surfactants: Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    9. Jinze Xu & Zhangxin Chen & Xiaohu Dong & Wei Zhou, 2017. "Effects of Lean Zones on Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Zhao, Renbao & Yu, Shuai & Yang, Jie & Heng, Minghao & Zhang, Chunhui & Wu, Yahong & Zhang, Jianhua & Yue, Xiang-an, 2018. "Optimization of well spacing to achieve a stable combustion during the THAI process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 467-477.
    11. Kang Ma & Hanqiao Jiang & Junjian Li & Rongda Zhang & Kangqi Shen & Yu Zhou, 2020. "A Novel Assisted Gas–Oil Countercurrent EOR Technique for Attic Oil in Fault-Block Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Ashrafi, Omid & Navarri, Philippe & Hughes, Robin & Lu, Dennis, 2016. "Heat recovery optimization in a steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 981-990.
    13. Dong, Xiaohu & Liu, Huiqing & Chen, Zhangxin & Wu, Keliu & Lu, Ning & Zhang, Qichen, 2019. "Enhanced oil recovery techniques for heavy oil and oilsands reservoirs after steam injection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1190-1211.
    14. Liu, Hao & Cheng, Linsong & Wu, Keliu & Huang, Shijun & Maini, Brij B., 2018. "Assessment of energy efficiency and solvent retention inside steam chamber of steam- and solvent-assisted gravity drainage process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 287-299.
    15. Baghernezhad, Danial & Siavashi, Majid & Nakhaee, Ali, 2019. "Optimal scenario design of steam-assisted gravity drainage to enhance oil recovery with temperature and rate control," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 610-623.
    16. Li, Pengliang & Liu, Zhenyi & Li, Mingzhi & Zhao, Yao & Qian, Xinming & Ren, Yuan, 2023. "Investigation on the reaction mechanism of methane combustion near flammability limits at elevated pressures and temperaturaes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    17. Liu, Yongge & Liu, Xiaoyu & Hou, Jian & Li, Huazhou Andy & Liu, Yueliang & Chen, Zhangxin, 2019. "Technical and economic feasibility of a novel heavy oil recovery method: Geothermal energy assisted heavy oil recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 853-867.
    18. Minxing Si & Ling Bai & Ke Du, 2021. "Discovering Energy Consumption Patterns with Unsupervised Machine Learning for Canadian In Situ Oil Sands Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Xia, Wenjie & Shen, Weijun & Yu, Li & Zheng, Chenggang & Yu, Weichu & Tang, Yongchun, 2016. "Conversion of petroleum to methane by the indigenous methanogenic consortia for oil recovery in heavy oil reservoir," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 646-655.
    20. Soiket, Md.I.H. & Oni, A.O. & Gemechu, E.D. & Kumar, A., 2019. "Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions of upgrading and refining bitumen from the solvent extraction process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 236-250.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:20:p:3860-:d:275710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.