IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i19p3628-d269952.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Two-Layer Interactive Mechanism for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Among Virtual Power Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Lyu

    (School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Zhiyu Xu

    (School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Ning Wang

    (School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Min Fu

    (School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Weisheng Xu

    (School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
    Institute of Bigdata and Informatization, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

This paper addresses decentralized energy trading among virtual power plants (VPPs) and proposes a peer-to-peer (P2P) mechanism, including two interactive layers: on the bottom layer, each VPP schedules/reschedules its internal distributed energy resources (DERs); and on the top layer, VPPs negotiate with each other on the trade price and quantity. The bottom-layer scheduling provides initial conditions for the top-layer negotiation, and the feedback of top-layer negotiation affects the bottom-layer rescheduling. The local scheduling/rescheduling of a VPP is formulated as a stochastic optimization problem, which takes into account the uncertainties of wind and photovoltaic power by using the scenarios-based method. In order to describe the capability of a seller VPP to generate more energy than the scheduled result, the concept of power generation potential is introduced and then considered during order initialization. The multidimensional willingness bidding strategy (MWBS) is modified and applied to the price bidding process of P2P negotiation. A 14-VPP case is studied by performing numerous computational experiments. The optimal scheduling model is effective and flexible to deal with VPPs with various configurations of DERs. The parallel price bidding with MWBS is adaptive to market situations and efficient due to its rapid convergence. It is revealed that VPPs can obtain higher profit by participating in P2P energy trading than from traditional centralized trading, and the proposed mechanism of two-layer “interactivity” can further increase VPPs’ benefits compared to its “forward” counterpart. The impacts of VPP configuration and VPP number are also studied. It is demonstrated that the proposed mechanism is applicable to most cases where VPPs manage some controllable DERs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Lyu & Zhiyu Xu & Ning Wang & Min Fu & Weisheng Xu, 2019. "A Two-Layer Interactive Mechanism for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Among Virtual Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-28, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:19:p:3628-:d:269952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shayegan-Rad, Ali & Badri, Ali & Zangeneh, Ali, 2017. "Day-ahead scheduling of virtual power plant in joint energy and regulation reserve markets under uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 114-125.
    2. Ning Wang & Weisheng Xu & Zhiyu Xu & Weihui Shao, 2018. "Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading among Microgrids with Multidimensional Willingness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Zhongfu Tan & Qingkun Tan & Shenbo Yang & Liwei Ju & Gejirifu De, 2018. "A Robust Scheduling Optimization Model for an Integrated Energy System with P2G Based on Improved CVaR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Gode, Dhananjay K & Sunder, Shyam, 1993. "Allocative Efficiency of Markets with Zero-Intelligence Traders: Market as a Partial Substitute for Individual Rationality," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 101(1), pages 119-137, February.
    5. Anh-Duc Nguyen & Van-Hai Bui & Akhtar Hussain & Duc-Huy Nguyen & Hak-Man Kim, 2018. "Impact of Demand Response Programs on Optimal Operation of Multi-Microgrid System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Economides, Nicholas & Tåg, Joacim, 2012. "Network neutrality on the Internet: A two-sided market analysis," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 91-104.
    7. Heinz, B. & Graeber, M. & Praktiknjo, A.J., 2013. "The diffusion process of stationary fuel cells in a two-sided market economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1556-1567.
    8. Zhang, Chenghua & Wu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Yue & Cheng, Meng & Long, Chao, 2018. "Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a Microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 1-12.
    9. Jian Wang & Qianggang Wang & Niancheng Zhou & Yuan Chi, 2017. "A Novel Electricity Transaction Mode of Microgrids Based on Blockchain and Continuous Double Auction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Juhar Abdella & Khaled Shuaib, 2018. "Peer to Peer Distributed Energy Trading in Smart Grids: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Liwei Ju & Peng Li & Qinliang Tan & Zhongfu Tan & GejiriFu De, 2018. "A CVaR-Robust Risk Aversion Scheduling Model for Virtual Power Plants Connected with Wind-Photovoltaic-Hydropower-Energy Storage Systems, Conventional Gas Turbines and Incentive-Based Demand Responses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amir Ali Safaei Pirooz & Mohammad J. Sanjari & Young-Jin Kim & Stuart Moore & Richard Turner & Wayne W. Weaver & Dipti Srinivasan & Josep M. Guerrero & Mohammad Shahidehpour, 2023. "Adaptation of High Spatio-Temporal Resolution Weather/Load Forecast in Real-World Distributed Energy-System Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Schwidtal, J.M. & Piccini, P. & Troncia, M. & Chitchyan, R. & Montakhabi, M. & Francis, C. & Gorbatcheva, A. & Capper, T. & Mustafa, M.A. & Andoni, M. & Robu, V. & Bahloul, M. & Scott, I.J. & Mbavarir, 2023. "Emerging business models in local energy markets: A systematic review of peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Capper, Timothy & Gorbatcheva, Anna & Mustafa, Mustafa A. & Bahloul, Mohamed & Schwidtal, Jan Marc & Chitchyan, Ruzanna & Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Montakhabi, Mehdi & Scott, Ian J. & Franci, 2022. "Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy: A systematic literature review of local energy market models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Arnob Das & Susmita Datta Peu & Md. Abdul Mannan Akanda & Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam, 2023. "Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Pricing Mechanisms: Towards a Comprehensive Analysis of Energy and Network Service Pricing (NSP) Mechanisms to Get Sustainable Enviro-Economical Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-27, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ning Wang & Weisheng Xu & Weihui Shao & Zhiyu Xu, 2019. "A Q-Cube Framework of Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Continuous Double Auction among Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Min Fu & Zhiyu Xu & Ning Wang & Xiaoyu Lyu & Weisheng Xu, 2020. "“Peer-to-Peer Plus” Electricity Transaction within Community of Active Energy Agents Regarding Distribution Network Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Sara Hebal & Djamila Mechta & Saad Harous & Mohammed Dhriyyef, 2021. "Hybrid Energy Routing Approach for Energy Internet," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-34, April.
    4. Guerrero, Jaysson & Gebbran, Daniel & Mhanna, Sleiman & Chapman, Archie C. & Verbič, Gregor, 2020. "Towards a transactive energy system for integration of distributed energy resources: Home energy management, distributed optimal power flow, and peer-to-peer energy trading," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Bandeiras, F. & Pinheiro, E. & Gomes, M. & Coelho, P. & Fernandes, J., 2020. "Review of the cooperation and operation of microgrid clusters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Rodrigues, Stefane Dias & Garcia, Vinicius Jacques, 2023. "Transactive energy in microgrid communities: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Arnob Das & Susmita Datta Peu & Md. Abdul Mannan Akanda & Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam, 2023. "Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Pricing Mechanisms: Towards a Comprehensive Analysis of Energy and Network Service Pricing (NSP) Mechanisms to Get Sustainable Enviro-Economical Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-27, February.
    8. Park, Sung-Won & Zhang, Zhong & Li, Furong & Son, Sung-Yong, 2021. "Peer-to-peer trading-based efficient flexibility securing mechanism to support distribution system stability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    9. Miguel Carpintero-Rentería & David Santos-Martín & Josep M. Guerrero, 2019. "Microgrids Literature Review through a Layers Structure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Hutty, Timothy D. & Brown, Solomon, 2024. "P2P trading of heat and power via a continuous double auction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    11. Yaxin Tan & Zhiyu Xu & Weisheng Xu, 2022. "A Two-Phase Hybrid Trading of Green Certificate under Renewables Portfolio Standards in Community of Active Energy Agents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Jin-Gyeom Kim & Bowon Lee, 2020. "Automatic P2P Energy Trading Model Based on Reinforcement Learning Using Long Short-Term Delayed Reward," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-27, October.
    13. Soto, Esteban A. & Bosman, Lisa B. & Wollega, Ebisa & Leon-Salas, Walter D., 2021. "Peer-to-peer energy trading: A review of the literature," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    14. Alexandros-Georgios Chronis & Foivos Palaiogiannis & Iasonas Kouveliotis-Lysikatos & Panos Kotsampopoulos & Nikos Hatziargyriou, 2021. "Photovoltaics Enabling Sustainable Energy Communities: Technological Drivers and Emerging Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Esmat, Ayman & de Vos, Martijn & Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar & Palensky, Peter & Epema, Dick, 2021. "A novel decentralized platform for peer-to-peer energy trading market with blockchain technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    16. Capper, Timothy & Gorbatcheva, Anna & Mustafa, Mustafa A. & Bahloul, Mohamed & Schwidtal, Jan Marc & Chitchyan, Ruzanna & Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Montakhabi, Mehdi & Scott, Ian J. & Franci, 2022. "Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy: A systematic literature review of local energy market models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Wenting Zhao & Jun Lv & Xilong Yao & Juanjuan Zhao & Zhixin Jin & Yan Qiang & Zheng Che & Chunwu Wei, 2019. "Consortium Blockchain-Based Microgrid Market Transaction Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Kuruseelan S & Vaithilingam C, 2019. "Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading of a Community Connected with an AC and DC Microgrid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    19. Hamzah Khan & Tariq Masood, 2022. "Impact of Blockchain Technology on Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-27, September.
    20. Paladin, Andrea & Das, Ridoy & Wang, Yue & Ali, Zunaib & Kotter, Richard & Putrus, Ghanim & Turri, Roberto, 2021. "Micro market based optimisation framework for decentralised management of distributed flexibility assets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1595-1611.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:19:p:3628-:d:269952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.