IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i6d10.1007_s10668-021-01804-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combined game model and investment decision making of power grid-distributed energy system

Author

Listed:
  • Yongxiu He

    (North China Electric Power University)

  • Wei Xiong

    (North China Electric Power University
    Changde Power Supply Branch of State Grid Hunan Power Co. LTD)

  • Binyou Yang

    (Changde Power Supply Branch of State Grid Hunan Power Co. LTD)

  • Hai-yan Yang

    (Changde Power Supply Branch of State Grid Hunan Power Co. LTD)

  • Jiu-fang Zhou

    (Changde Power Supply Branch of State Grid Hunan Power Co. LTD)

  • Ming-li Cui

    (China University of Geosciences)

  • Yan Li

    (China University of Geosciences)

Abstract

Distributed energy based on clean energy has gradually become a progressively important part of the energy system due to increasingly prominent environmental problems and energy crises. Presently, the development of distributed energy has the phenomena of investment chaos, resource waste, and information asymmetry. We propose a grid-distributed energy system joint decision-making model based on the alliance blockchain to solve problems including the power generation strategy of distributed energy users and the grid investment plan connected to the distributed system. Firstly, we construct the return models of the distributed energy system and the power grid system separately. Secondly, combined with the analysis of the game mechanism of different entities, we propose a multi-agent decision-making model of the distributed energy system based on the alliance blockchain. Thirdly, based on this model, we optimize the revenue of the entire system through the dynamic game and use the alliance chain and smart contract to automatically execute. Finally, the model is solved by the iterative search method, and the entire simulation process is implemented in Ethereum using python. Based on the idea of joint decision making, our study considers the interests of all participants, ensures that the participants maximize their benefits in the game process, optimizes the investment decisions of each entity, and improves the effectiveness of the grid-distributed energy system decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongxiu He & Wei Xiong & Binyou Yang & Hai-yan Yang & Jiu-fang Zhou & Ming-li Cui & Yan Li, 2022. "Combined game model and investment decision making of power grid-distributed energy system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8667-8690, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01804-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01804-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01804-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01804-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Mengmeng & Hong, Seung Ho, 2017. "Incentive-based demand response considering hierarchical electricity market: A Stackelberg game approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 267-279.
    2. Wang, Can & Yan, Chao & Li, Gengfeng & Liu, Shiyu & Bie, Zhaohong, 2020. "Risk assessment of integrated electricity and heat system with independent energy operators based on Stackelberg game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Liang, Yile & Liu, Feng & Wang, Cheng & Mei, Shengwei, 2017. "Distributed demand-side energy management scheme in residential smart grids: An ordinal state-based potential game approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 991-1008.
    4. Jian Wang & Qianggang Wang & Niancheng Zhou & Yuan Chi, 2017. "A Novel Electricity Transaction Mode of Microgrids Based on Blockchain and Continuous Double Auction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Li, Yinan & Yang, Wentao & He, Ping & Chen, Chang & Wang, Xiaonan, 2019. "Design and management of a distributed hybrid energy system through smart contract and blockchain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 390-405.
    6. Ahl, Amanda & Yarime, Masaru & Tanaka, Kenji & Sagawa, Daishi, 2019. "Review of blockchain-based distributed energy: Implications for institutional development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 200-211.
    7. Jiani Wu & Nguyen Khoi Tran, 2018. "Application of Blockchain Technology in Sustainable Energy Systems: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Noor, Sana & Yang, Wentao & Guo, Miao & van Dam, Koen H. & Wang, Xiaonan, 2018. "Energy Demand Side Management within micro-grid networks enhanced by blockchain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1385-1398.
    9. Shengnan Zhao & Beibei Wang & Yachao Li & Yang Li, 2018. "Integrated Energy Transaction Mechanisms Based on Blockchain Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Ning Wang & Weisheng Xu & Zhiyu Xu & Weihui Shao, 2018. "Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading among Microgrids with Multidimensional Willingness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Longze & Liu, Jinxin & Yuan, Rongfang & Wu, Jing & Zhang, Delong & Zhang, Yan & Li, Meicheng, 2020. "Adaptive bidding strategy for real-time energy management in multi-energy market enhanced by blockchain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Schwidtal, J.M. & Piccini, P. & Troncia, M. & Chitchyan, R. & Montakhabi, M. & Francis, C. & Gorbatcheva, A. & Capper, T. & Mustafa, M.A. & Andoni, M. & Robu, V. & Bahloul, M. & Scott, I.J. & Mbavarir, 2023. "Emerging business models in local energy markets: A systematic review of peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Esmat, Ayman & de Vos, Martijn & Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar & Palensky, Peter & Epema, Dick, 2021. "A novel decentralized platform for peer-to-peer energy trading market with blockchain technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    4. Yildizbasi, Abdullah, 2021. "Blockchain and renewable energy: Integration challenges in circular economy era," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 183-197.
    5. Capper, Timothy & Gorbatcheva, Anna & Mustafa, Mustafa A. & Bahloul, Mohamed & Schwidtal, Jan Marc & Chitchyan, Ruzanna & Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Montakhabi, Mehdi & Scott, Ian J. & Franci, 2022. "Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy: A systematic literature review of local energy market models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Zheng Che & Yu Wang & Juanjuan Zhao & Yan Qiang & Yue Ma & Jihua Liu, 2019. "A Distributed Energy Trading Authentication Mechanism Based on a Consortium Blockchain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Florentina Magda Enescu & Nicu Bizon & Adrian Onu & Maria Simona Răboacă & Phatiphat Thounthong & Alin Gheorghita Mazare & Gheorghe Șerban, 2020. "Implementing Blockchain Technology in Irrigation Systems That Integrate Photovoltaic Energy Generation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-30, February.
    8. Nan Jiang & Qi Han & Guohua Zhu, 2023. "A Three-Dimensional Analytical Framework: Textual Analysis and Comparison of Chinese and US Energy Blockchain Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    9. Rodrigues, Stefane Dias & Garcia, Vinicius Jacques, 2023. "Transactive energy in microgrid communities: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Roth, Tamara & Utz, Manuel & Baumgarte, Felix & Rieger, Alexander & Sedlmeir, Johannes & Strüker, Jens, 2022. "Electricity powered by blockchain: A review with a European perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    11. Jagdish Prasad Nepal & Nuttaya Yuangyai & Saroj Gyawali & Chumpol Yuangyai, 2022. "Blockchain-Based Smart Renewable Energy: Review of Operational and Transactional Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Di Silvestre, Maria Luisa & Gallo, Pierluigi & Guerrero, Josep M. & Musca, Rossano & Riva Sanseverino, Eleonora & Sciumè, Giuseppe & Vásquez, Juan C. & Zizzo, Gaetano, 2020. "Blockchain for power systems: Current trends and future applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Foti, Magda & Vavalis, Manolis, 2019. "Blockchain based uniform price double auctions for energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    14. Huang, Chung-Ting & Scott, Ian J., 2024. "Peer-to-peer multi-period energy market with flexible scheduling on a scalable and cost-effective blockchain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    15. Matteo Troncia & Marco Galici & Mario Mureddu & Emilio Ghiani & Fabrizio Pilo, 2019. "Distributed Ledger Technologies for Peer-to-Peer Local Markets in Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Turki Alsuwian & Aiman Shahid Butt & Arslan Ahmed Amin, 2022. "Smart Grid Cyber Security Enhancement: Challenges and Solutions—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Ning Wang & Weisheng Xu & Weihui Shao & Zhiyu Xu, 2019. "A Q-Cube Framework of Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Continuous Double Auction among Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, July.
    18. Miguel Carpintero-Rentería & David Santos-Martín & Josep M. Guerrero, 2019. "Microgrids Literature Review through a Layers Structure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Amiri, Maghsoud & Hosseini Bamakan, Seyed Mojtaba, 2024. "Evaluating the blockchain technology strategies for reducing renewable energy development risks using a novel integrated decision framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    20. Ahl, A. & Yarime, M. & Goto, M. & Chopra, Shauhrat S. & Kumar, Nallapaneni Manoj. & Tanaka, K. & Sagawa, D., 2020. "Exploring blockchain for the energy transition: Opportunities and challenges based on a case study in Japan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01804-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.