IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i16p3040-d255469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment Method for Integrated Transmission–Distribution System Considering the Reactive Power Regulation Capability of DGs

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Wang

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Dasong Sun

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Jianxiong Hu

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Yi Wu

    (State Grid Jiangsu Electric Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, China)

  • Ji Zhou

    (National Electric Power Dispatching and Control Center, State Grid Corporation of China, Beijing 100031, China)

  • Yi Tang

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

High distributed generation (DG) penetration makes the traditional method of equalizing the distribution power system (DPS) to the PQ load bus in the risk assessment of the transmission power system (TPS) no longer applicable. This paper proposes a risk assessment method for an integrated transmission–distribution system that considers the reactive power regulation capability of the DGs. Based on the DG’s characteristics and network constraints, the regulation capacity is mapped to the boundary buses of the distribution networks. Coordinating the relationship between reactive power and active power, the utilization of the regulation capacity is maximized to reduce the load shedding in the fault analysis of the TPS. Simulation results in the integrated transmission–distribution system illustrate that the effective use of the regulation capacity of the DPS can reduce the risk of the TPS. The method can be applied to the reactive power sources planning and dispatching of power system.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Wang & Dasong Sun & Jianxiong Hu & Yi Wu & Ji Zhou & Yi Tang, 2019. "Risk Assessment Method for Integrated Transmission–Distribution System Considering the Reactive Power Regulation Capability of DGs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:16:p:3040-:d:255469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/16/3040/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/16/3040/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arun Onlam & Daranpob Yodphet & Rongrit Chatthaworn & Chayada Surawanitkun & Apirat Siritaratiwat & Pirat Khunkitti, 2019. "Power Loss Minimization and Voltage Stability Improvement in Electrical Distribution System via Network Reconfiguration and Distributed Generation Placement Using Novel Adaptive Shuffled Frogs Leaping," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Weisi Deng & Buhan Zhang & Hongfa Ding & Hang Li, 2017. "Risk-Based Probabilistic Voltage Stability Assessment in Uncertain Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Whei-Min Lin & Chung-Yuen Yang & Chia-Sheng Tu & Ming-Tang Tsai, 2018. "An Optimal Scheduling Dispatch of a Microgrid under Risk Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Md Tariqul Islam & M. J. Hossain, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence for Hosting Capacity Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-33, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nasreddine Belbachir & Mohamed Zellagui & Samir Settoul & Claude Ziad El-Bayeh & Ragab A. El-Sehiemy, 2023. "Multi Dimension-Based Optimal Allocation of Uncertain Renewable Distributed Generation Outputs with Seasonal Source-Load Power Uncertainties in Electrical Distribution Network Using Marine Predator Al," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Biyun Chen & Haoying Chen & Yiyi Zhang & Junhui Zhao & Emad Manla, 2019. "Risk Assessment for the Power Grid Dispatching Process Considering the Impact of Cyber Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. M. Rambabu & G. V. Nagesh Kumar & S. Sivanagaraju, 2019. "Optimal Power Flow of Integrated Renewable Energy System using a Thyristor Controlled SeriesCompensator and a Grey-Wolf Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Luis A. Gallego Pareja & Jesús M. López-Lezama & Oscar Gómez Carmona, 2022. "A Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Model for the Simultaneous Optimal Distribution Network Reconfiguration and Optimal Placement of Distributed Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Mohammed Alzubaidi & Kazi N. Hasan & Lasantha Meegahapola & Mir Toufikur Rahman, 2021. "Identification of Efficient Sampling Techniques for Probabilistic Voltage Stability Analysis of Renewable-Rich Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Xiuyun Wang & Shaoxin Chen & Yibing Zhou & Jian Wang & Yang Cui, 2018. "Optimal Dispatch of Microgrid with Combined Heat and Power System Considering Environmental Cost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Habib Ur Rehman & Arif Hussain & Waseem Haider & Sayyed Ahmad Ali & Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Muhammad Huzaifa, 2023. "Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-38, March.
    8. Panyawoot Boonluk & Sirote Khunkitti & Pradit Fuangfoo & Apirat Siritaratiwat, 2021. "Optimal Siting and Sizing of Battery Energy Storage: Case Study Seventh Feeder at Nakhon Phanom Substation in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Ali M. Hakami & Kazi N. Hasan & Mohammed Alzubaidi & Manoj Datta, 2022. "A Review of Uncertainty Modelling Techniques for Probabilistic Stability Analysis of Renewable-Rich Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Wu, Zhongqun & Yang, Chan & Zheng, Ruijin, 2022. "Developing a holistic fuzzy hierarchy-cloud assessment model for the connection risk of renewable energy microgrid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    11. S. Angalaeswari & P. Sanjeevikumar & K. Jamuna & Zbigniew Leonowicz, 2020. "Hybrid PIPSO-SQP Algorithm for Real Power Loss Minimization in Radial Distribution Systems with Optimal Placement of Distributed Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Shanghua Guo & Jian Lin & Yuming Zhao & Longjun Wang & Gang Wang & Guowei Liu, 2020. "A Reliability-Based Network Reconfiguration Model in Distribution System with DGs and ESSs Using Mixed-Integer Programming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Jie Zhu & Buxiang Zhou & Yiwei Qiu & Tianlei Zang & Yi Zhou & Shi Chen & Ningyi Dai & Huan Luo, 2023. "Survey on Modeling of Temporally and Spatially Interdependent Uncertainties in Renewable Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Oscar Danilo Montoya & Walter Gil-González & Andrés Arias-Londoño & Arul Rajagopalan & Jesus C. Hernández, 2020. "Voltage Stability Analysis in Medium-Voltage Distribution Networks Using a Second-Order Cone Approximation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Tianhao Song & Xiaoqing Han & Baifu Zhang, 2021. "Multi-Time-Scale Optimal Scheduling in Active Distribution Network with Voltage Stability Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Supanat Chamchuen & Apirat Siritaratiwat & Pradit Fuangfoo & Puripong Suthisopapan & Pirat Khunkitti, 2021. "High-Accuracy Power Quality Disturbance Classification Using the Adaptive ABC-PSO as Optimal Feature Selection Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Heng-Yi Su & Tzu-Yi Liu, 2017. "A PMU-Based Method for Smart Transmission Grid Voltage Security Visualization and Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    18. Nien-Che Yang & Yan-Lin Zeng & Tsai-Hsiang Chen, 2021. "Assessment of Voltage Imbalance Improvement and Power Loss Reduction in Residential Distribution Systems in Taiwan," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Eshan Karunarathne & Jagadeesh Pasupuleti & Janaka Ekanayake & Dilini Almeida, 2020. "Optimal Placement and Sizing of DGs in Distribution Networks Using MLPSO Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, November.
    20. Mimica, Marko & Giménez de Urtasun, Laura & Krajačić, Goran, 2022. "A robust risk assessment method for energy planning scenarios on smart islands under the demand uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:16:p:3040-:d:255469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.